Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I have a really ridiculous question about Bush's leaded-gas proposal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 04:37 AM
Original message
I have a really ridiculous question about Bush's leaded-gas proposal
What are we supposed to burn this new leaded gas in?

Check this shit out, for it displays the absolute cluelessness of the Bush administration. In the 1970s, the government mandated that all gasoline-burning motor vehicles, except motorcycles (where it would be dangerous to implement it), would have a catalytic converter. Lead fumes from burning leaded gas coat the catalyst and destroy it, so the government mandated that all gas stations would carry unleaded and that leaded would eventually be phased out.

All well and good, and now the vast majority of cars on the road today are equipped to only use unleaded gas. Running leaded gas in those cars would be REAL expensive.

If Bush decides to let them put lead back in gas, the only people who can burn it are driving classic cars--and they don't even have to, if they pull their cylinder heads and get stellite valve seats put in them.

But yeah, this doesn't exactly seem like the most thought-out proposal Shrub's ever entertained.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 04:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. this doesn't exactly seem like the most thought-out proposal
when is any of shrub's proposals well thought out?

according to the article: http://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/blogs/politicalticker/2006/12/epa-leaded-gas-may-return-along-with.html

Battery makers, lead smelters, refiners all have lobbied the administration to do away with the Clean Air Act limits.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. I thought the idea was to gut the clean air act
which could let refiners put lead back into gasoline... but more important is what it means for lead smelting operations and folks who make lead-acid batteries... allowing them to go back to their bad old ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why in the hell
would they want to put lead BACK in gasoline?

What did I miss?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Because it allows them to use lower-quality fuel, for one...
Edited on Mon Dec-11-06 05:33 AM by Spider Jerusalem
lead tetraethyl is the most efficient octane booster there is; they'd be able to get more usable gasoline out of lower-quality petroleum that would burn in automobile engines than using current additives. (The octane rating measures how much compression the fuel can be subjected to before combusting; leaded fuel has ratings up to 112+ octane, while unleaded only goes as high as 93.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. Unleaded can go to 106 octane in what's available now
It might be able to go higher, but VP Racing Fuels' Motorsport 109 (pump octane 105, research octane 109) is available now, though you probably don't want to be caught running it on the street.

Sunoco 260GT Plus is pump octane 106, and it's a non-oxygenated fuel.

Then again...Sunoco Maximal Leaded is pump octane 116.

Now...if you REALLY don't want to fuck around, try some purple avgas--145 octane. This is the shit you put in your P-51 Mustang.

You can get serious octane out of unleaded fuel. What you WON'T get is serious octane as cheap as tetraethyl lead will give it to you--racing fuel is many dollars a gallon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. I have no clue what Bush's ppl are thinking
Leaded gas is still made and used in some private airplanes. But even most of them use Low Lead. But that is a limited use which I have no problem with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. Is he going for idiot of the century?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 05:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. That was awarded already to him
We are speaking in terms of Moran of the Millennium at this juncture. :crazy: :freak: :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Fitting, and such nice alliteration.
:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 05:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. I believe the Missouri governor (Blunt) did much the same thing.
He said our air was too clean and authorized some company to produce more pollution. It must be a republican thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diane in sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. they are preparing the air
Edited on Mon Dec-11-06 05:36 AM by diane in sf
for their lizard masters to take over the earth! Unlike earth creatures alien lizards enjoy lead-scented air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 05:47 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Well, this one is planning to doubledeal the lizard masters.
He has a brother and stepmother who are lobbyists engaged in increasing the family fortunes and a father who enables national contacts. Sound familiar?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diane in sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 05:55 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. So familiar!
His excellent entrepreneurial activities will earn high praise from the alien lizard high council! In fact they and their minions at Carlyle may require a piece of the action!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ms liberty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #9
22. Good one...Welcome to DU, diane in sf! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. That isn't news to you, is it? The "republican thing", I mean.
Edited on Mon Dec-11-06 07:29 AM by WinkyDink
What policy have they ever proposed or passed that benefitted America/Americans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 03:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
25. The Republican thing.
Call it sarcasm. Call it a dry sense of humor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
13. It will screw up more than your catalytic convertor
It will royally clog up your fuel injectors too, leading to more frequent replacement and poorer gas mileage.

I wonder if this is his response to people's opposition to letting Mexican trucks in, which are burning leaded fuel. Instead of requiring them to dump their fuel, they just make it leaded for everyboy:crazy:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I didn't know about Mexico is allowing leaded gasoline in trucks...
In the context of pushing N.A. to minimum evironmental protection and labor standards, this has more truthiness than it otherwise might.

It may be that the change in lead air pollution standard is directed a lead smelting. It's a safe bet that involves some corporate contributors to Bush and the GOP.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasProgresive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. They burn diesel, duh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. People's opposition to Mexican trucks has little to do with fuel...
and a lot to do with the absence of working brakes on a lot of them.

Oh, and the NDMFs behind the wheel of the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
16. I think pissy pants is planning on buying that 1967 GTO that he's had his eyes
on for so long.

He wants to make sure he has gas to put in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ms liberty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. He doesn't deserve a '67 GTO...
Now me, for example...VERY MUCH deserve a '67 Goat - but I can't afford one! (And I'd just as soon have a Chevelle (say 67-72 I'm not picky), thank you!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mendocino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
18. Lead: It's the new Mercury.
Since lead has been eliminated from gasoline, many batteries, less use in sporting goods (lead shot and fishing sinkers), printing (lead type is virtually non-existent anymore), the market has dried up even though many rich deposits remain in this country. These mine owners see $$$ but need consumers. Bush always bends over for "robber barons".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
19. I didn't think it was specifically about leaded gas, but more for
those companies that also deal with lead, smelters etc. It would be stupid to bring back leaded gas now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
20. It's really a brilliant scam to bail out the auto industry
so don't laugh at the monkey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
26. If'n I'm not mistaken
back in the day of the switch, the deal was unleaded gas was to be cheaper due to not adding lead to it. WTF happened to that idea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC