Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, why does the DU spellchecker find "Repukes" as a misspell?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 09:10 AM
Original message
So, why does the DU spellchecker find "Repukes" as a misspell?
Inquiring minds want to know ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Because it's not a word. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. ;)
but it is getting more and more common (I was being facetious in the original post ...)

Sorry ... should have been posted in DU lounge, really ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. It finds Repos as a misspell also. But I don't mind. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's a politically correct dictionary.
Other words it refuses to recognize:

Repug
Knuckledragger
O'Liely
Bushit
Chimperor
Clenis

There are surely more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Knuckledragger
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. LOL, you can get some computer programs to recognize
words, maybe DU can't, but such a program could get it to recognize certain words - I guess it does the same for "moran" and "screwn?"

Which means Freeperville has no spellchecker, or the freepers rarely use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. Could you imagine the chaos if we altered the spell check
to accommodate the words we copy to mock the poor learning skills of the Repukes?

"moran" "internets" etc....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. Substitute republics
Edited on Mon Dec-11-06 09:32 AM by rock
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. I've been using Iespell, its a right click and with options of a dictionary and wipipedia
and it allows you to add words which I like because I barely can make myself type republican so I type repuke and iespell accepts that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
9. Because Skinner is secretly a FREEPER!!
THIS IS HUGH!11!!@! :sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm:


Haven't we got better things to ask?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. We are definitely screwn!
Wouldn't it be horrid to find out that is actually a past participle of screw, or was in the middle ages or something?

:scared::scared::scared::scared::scared::scared::scared::scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
12. Firefox...?
I use the one in the new Firefox 2.0 -- I can just add to dictionary so the squiggly red lines disappear. It's understandable that a dictionary used by the public won't necessarily include colloquials. But dictionaries you use in outlook, office or Firefox are customizable, so add away.

But the DU 'check spelling' is sensitive to Canadian spellings and words; it doesn't think 'labour' is wrong or it doesn't try to hyphenate chesterfield!! (more of that 'projection of American power' :eyes:)

A lot of online dictionaries do oppress 'u' (yuk yuk yuk)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC