|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-11-06 12:00 PM Original message |
Uh... Why Were We Spying on Princess Diana? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-11-06 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
1. I guess b/c Britain wanted to spy on her, but didn't want it traced |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ezlivin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-11-06 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
2. Probably the Dodi Al-Fayed connection |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-11-06 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
3. Her anti-mine activities. I still don't 'get' that at all. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Treclo (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-11-06 12:58 PM Response to Reply #3 |
18. Anti-mine? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alarimer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-11-06 01:03 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. But the US is not against land mines |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-11-06 02:11 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. We're against it so we can maintain the minefield between North and South Korea. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-11-06 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
4. Because the British authorities asked us to, so they could claim they were not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-11-06 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
5. "We" weren't as citizens. The CIA was engaging in the eavesdropping. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-11-06 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
6. ECHELON, but they thought the Royalty was exempt: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
China_cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-11-06 12:15 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. After the divorce |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakeme2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-11-06 12:17 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. Right and Clinton probably did not know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-11-06 12:25 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. We easily forget that Clinton was a DLCer... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-11-06 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
7. Terra - No wait, that was before there was terraist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-11-06 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
8. Clinton was interested in her? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-11-06 12:13 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Deleted message |
JacksonWest (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-11-06 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
9. I assume we spy on everybody |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monkey see Monkey Do (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-11-06 12:55 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. It's part of Lord Stevens inquiry which is due to be published on Thursday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JacksonWest (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-11-06 01:03 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Ahhh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crankie Avalon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-11-06 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
10. Because she was one of those fuzzy peacenik-type celebrities. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-11-06 12:22 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. I think the US spies on ALL people in position of national power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinfoilinfor2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-11-06 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
14. I'm surprised |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-11-06 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
19. They are trying too hard to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-11-06 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
22. we should ask Limbaugh, Hannity and Beck, maybe they know? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-11-06 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
24. It was probably a favor to Lyndon Larouche |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unc70 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-11-06 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
25. Dodi's uncle is Adnan Khashoggi, the arms dealer n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC