Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How much do the "talking heads" really know about what they are reporting on?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 12:44 PM
Original message
How much do the "talking heads" really know about what they are reporting on?
Are most of them just readers of the news? Do they study what is going on in the world? Or are most of them just ignorant of what is happening?

Did they get their job because they "looked good" on camera? Or did they have the right "connection"? Or did they get their job because they are knowledgeable about what they are reporting on?

It seems to me that there are very few that know what is really going on. They only report what is put in front of them. So long as their hair looks good...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'll take "looks good on camera" for $500, Kentuck ...
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Dirty Laundry, Don Henley
The bubble-headed bleach-blonde comes on at five,
She can tell you 'bout the plane crash with a gleam in her eye,
its interesting when people die, give us Dirty Laundry...

...

Well, I coulda been an actor, but I wound up here,
I just have to look good I don't have to be clear...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Some just read, but some really do know what's going on too.
The ones you see traveling to Iraq, New Orleans, or even some on the WH Press Corps seem to know what they're talking about, even if you disagree with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Olbermann: 99% - Rita Cosby: 2%
Katie Couric: <1%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. some are more knowledgable than others
Wolf Blitzer for example knows quite a bit, relatively speaking.

But the ones that know the most don't see the light of day on TV, like Robert Fisk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Wolf Blitzer has always seemed to like repeating White House..
talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. actually, David Byrne has been really outspoken against the war
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. I know that that asshat Glenn Beck was talking about global warming one time
and said about something "That was published in something called 'Nature' and I think the Bush admin. has a leetle more credibility than this 'Nature' or whatever...."

Its just shameful that CNN allows some idiot to talk about science when they don't even know what 'Nature' is...:eyes:



"Something called 'Nature'"....feh...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. Newsreaders....
This is what they have started to be called in UK...they got sick and tired of the way the media screwed them over with the news. They said none of the newsreaders care a bit about the truth, they READ what the owners put in front of them....I think that is what we should call the ones in front of the camera here. They never go out and do journalist reporting, except for people like Anderson Cooper and a few others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. Kentuck, you talkin "Blonde Barbies" or "Plastic Hair Kens"?


Disclaimer: I am not into bashing people's looks. I flipped from channel to channel one morning and they all are beginning to look just alike. I have no idea what their names are anymore...

We use to know their names due to differences in how they reported AND from WHERE !

Now, they are all behind a desk and you wonder if they even get out in the weather...much less where the news is happening.

There are a few who have my upmost admiration for being in Iraq and other places where conditions are terrible and dangerous.


The rest are Desk People. They read what is put in front of them.

That's my answer.....they can read, Kentuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. As much as I dislike Candy Crowley...
She's about the only one left who looks like somebody you might see at the Winn-Dixie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. It's a feedback loop -- They watch and read the same stuff we do
Edited on Mon Dec-11-06 01:04 PM by Armstead
The ongoing evolution of "conventional wisdom" in the MSM seems to merely be a self-perpetuiating feedback loop. The same concepts -- and even exact phrases -- just seem to go around and around.

These dorks watch and read each other and then regurgitate what they hear as pundits. Maybe they make a few phone calls to be "reporters" but they all call the same few people, and repeat the same s
The whole spin about Howard Dean was a classic example.He is basically a moderate liberal pragmatist, but because he dared to veer slightly from the beltway Wisdom, and has a real personality, he was characterized as a representative of the "far left."

Once the media echo chamber started repeating that, it just looped and looped and fed itself.

So, the short answer is that You Too Could Be Pundit and "Reporter" if you watch an hour or two of television and read a couple of magazines and newspapers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
12. Most could be replaced by that "text reader" you get with a new
computer ...

You know, on Windows (xp):

click on start
All Programs
Accessories
Accessibility
Narrator

And, with today's computers, they could hire a smart guy to have a virtual person on screen move its lips in sync with the sounds ...

Many people wouldn't be able to tell the difference ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. If you can't read a teleprompter? - you're pretty much screwed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoil tiaras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. Like the female Faux anchors?
All of them are suspeciously typical-pretty girl looking, imho.

Don't know if I can say the same about the guys on Faux (Billo? Brit Hume? :puke: ), exept for Hannity. Even though he may be a major douchebag, the man looks like Brad Pitt compared to Alan Colmes (sorry, Alan).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC