Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Doesn't Barack Obama Get Credit For Opposing The Iraq War Resolution?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 09:46 PM
Original message
Why Doesn't Barack Obama Get Credit For Opposing The Iraq War Resolution?
If experience is synonymous with wisdom why did wily Senate veterans like John Kerry, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Joe Biden, Evan Bayh , etcetera support the Iraq War Resolution...

Could it be because the war was popular at the time and they were concerned about their political viability?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. He was not in the Senate at the time of the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. He Made Speeches Against It Is As An Illinois State Senator
Edited on Tue Dec-12-06 09:52 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because Barak could...
He wasn't elected then....

He wasn't even considered a threat to win the Senate...

That's why no one of higher stature stepped into the race in 04...

Remember, he ran against Alan Keyes...

It's much easier to oppose something when you...

Much harder when you have too...

So, I am not taking anything away from him...

Let's see how he votes over the next twelve months...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Beating Alan Keyes Isn't Much More Difficult Than Beating Bu$h IMHO...
Edited on Tue Dec-12-06 09:53 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. The entire force of the Republicans behind an incumbent president...
...is no more challenging than running against a talk radio host from out-of-state who wants to be Senator in a solidly Democratic state?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Alan Keyes' I Q>>>>> Bush's I Q
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. what about the dems who actually had the courage to vote NO...?
NOT ONE OF THEM has suffered any political consequences for their vote. In fact, several are about to be promoted to powerful committee chairs. If "John Kerry, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Joe Biden, Evan Bayh," etc voted for the war because "they were concerned about their political viability" then events have proven even that canard was a disasterous miscalculation. They were wrong by any measure one wants to use-- wrong about the substance of the IWR, wrong about the politics, wrong about the path they led America along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. what you said.
:toast: MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. The Ones Who Voted No Have A Clean Conscience As Their Reward...
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. yes, but my point is that the ones who voted yes have no refuge....
Edited on Tue Dec-12-06 10:00 PM by mike_c
Not even their imagined political fears. And do we really want leadership that makes the decision to start an illegal war of aggression based on political triangulation?

As for Obama, I am very pleased that he opposed the invasion of Iraq before he joined the Senate. I want to see how he works to end it now that he is in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why don't you and I? (What's 'credit' look like?) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. I gave him credit for his opposition when I voted for him as Senator.
Then he shook my faith when he voted to confirm Rice. What a slap in the face to those of us against the Iraq War. He's not on my short list now. Neither are those you mention. Of course that makes my short list really short.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I Don't Remember The Rice Vote Total...
I suspect most senators voted for Rice...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I'm only concerned with his vote.
My other Senator voted against.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. He does. NT
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. I don't think that really deserves much credit.
Supporting it deserves a lot of shame, but I don't give much credit for opposing something so obviously ba.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. It's Amazing How Many Democratic Senators Supported It...
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. It's a shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
18. i think after 9/11 it was clear action was called for, though when these...
people we otherwise hold in high esteem voted for the resolution, they were not voting to sanction the insanity of g.w. bush being unreleased without oversight onto an unsuspecting world
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. That doesn't say much about their judgement.
I believe they lacked the courage. Political windsocks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Exactly...
Edited on Tue Dec-12-06 10:22 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
At least Joe Lieberman believed in the efficacy of the war...

Kerry, Edwards, Clinton, et all voted for it because they thought it would be successful and they wanted to be on the right side of the issue...


But some obscure Illinois state senator (Obama) saw it was folly from its conception....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. that's true enough, their judgments about bush have been off by leagues...
about bush & what he was capable of in particular, in that sense they should have never put a stick into his hands
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. I Know You're Not Linking Saddam To 9-11
But attacking Iraq because OBL was behind the 9-11 attacks would be akin to America declaring war on China because Japan attacked Pearl Harbor....


I think Bu$h attacked Iraq because it sounded like Iran and he got the two mixed up but what's the excuse of all the Democratic senators that supported him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. no, imo it started with Afghanistan which is still hanging out there somewhere...
unfinished & getting near it's tipping point, the whole thing was merely a pretext for this cheney/bush junta to act-out, i fault many though for being civil to a fault for presuming bush would never have done such a thing...that has proven to be a gross miscalculation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. You can make a decent case for invading Afghanistan...
Invading Iraq was the height of folly...


What a waste of precious life and capital....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. that's not possible to disagree with...
peace :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. The Sad Thing Is We Will Leave Iraq Sooner Or Later...
And we will leave it infinitely worse than we found it...


And all the posturing by Bush and his ever dwindling band of supporters can not do a damn thing about it...


In the current issue of Vanity Fair they have a Mount Rushmore of political losers with Herbert Hoover, Richard Nixon, and George Bush...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. i'm say'n...i think the lid on Pandora's box has only just been cracked a bit...
i think the real geopolitical hell is broiling, fomenting, metastasizing at this very moment no thanks to this bush kid & his whims & fancies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC