Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fareed Zakaria wonders if Bush needs a therapist more than an advisor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-13-06 04:38 PM
Original message
Fareed Zakaria wonders if Bush needs a therapist more than an advisor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-13-06 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fareek said "double down" last night
that was the first I had heard of that phrase being used in this context. Apparently that was what everyone "in the know" was calling it because that is what everyone is saying Bush is going to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-13-06 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Double or nothing....
A crapshoot.... a gamble...all or nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-13-06 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Just one more time
I SWEAR PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEASE!!!!

That is what we are reduced to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-13-06 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Double down. Isn't that how you produce a really hard shit?
Great, if somewhat depressing interview.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-13-06 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe a lobotomy
before he can do anymore damage. They used to do those to particularly deranged and psychotic people...

Mz Pip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-13-06 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. he also thinks that Chimpy will be the "LAST" neocon to hold office....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-13-06 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Put quotes on that "neocon" tag. It only means they'll have to rebrand imperialism again.
With Republicans it's always about marketing, never about results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-13-06 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wonder? what's to wonder about?! it's obvious-remove him now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-13-06 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. It appears Bush has been having emotional/mental probs trying to outdo
Bush Sr. instead of looking out for the good of the country.

Bush does not make any sense, too many military professionals have stated this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-13-06 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Pentagon's Plan: More US Troops in Iraq
Pentagon's Plan: More US Troops in Iraq

Boosting presence and aid, and an anti-Sadr offensive, carry risks but offer the best path to victory, military officials say.
by Julian E. Barnes



Outside the Pentagon, in other corners of government, officials are skeptical that an increase in military power will end sectarian violence. James Dobbins, a former U.S. diplomat and advisor to the Iraq Study Group, said many Iraqis believed that U.S. forces put them in danger, rather than improving security.

"The American troop presence is wildly unpopular in Iraq," Dobbins said. "Any effort to double our bet will lead to ever more catastrophic results."



http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/1213-04.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-13-06 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm sick of FZ
He pimped the war against Iraq big time in Newsweek and encouraged Bush to go ahead with its plans to take out Saddam.

I honestly don't know why Jon Stewart gives this guy so much air time. He's a loser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-13-06 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. he was a war cheerleader once
my, my.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
personman Donating Member (959 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-13-06 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Shadey:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-13-06 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. jeeze I forgot all about that!
:grr:

It was the kind of shadowy, secret Washington meeting that Bob Woodward is fond of describing in detail. In his new book, “State of Denial,” he writes that on Nov. 29, 2001, a dozen policy makers, Middle East experts and members of influential policy research organizations gathered in Virginia at the request of Paul D. Wolfowitz, then the deputy secretary of defense. A report was produced for President Bush and his cabinet outlining a strategy for dealing with Afghanistan and the Middle East in the aftermath of 9/11.

What was more unusual, Mr. Woodward reveals, was the presence of journalists at the meeting. Fareed Zakaria, the editor of Newsweek International and a Newsweek columnist, and Robert D. Kaplan, now a national correspondent for The Atlantic Monthly, attended the meeting and, according to Mr. Kaplan, signed confidentiality agreements not to discuss what happened.

Mr. Zakaria, who was not told that the meeting would produce a report, takes issue with Mr. Woodward’s account.

“I thought it was a brainstorming session,” he said. “I was never told that there was going to be a document summarizing our views and I have never seen such a document.” (Mr. Woodward wrote that the report, which supported the invasion of Iraq, caused Mr. Bush to focus on the “malignancy” of the Middle East situation.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-13-06 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. Wonder of wonders that this former Bushbot didn't have
many admiring words about Bush this time around. Like Randi said the rats are abandoning the ship. Really, I believe it's the mice that are jumping and leaving the king rat alone to drown.

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC