|
Local news ... some OKC station I had on in the background at work today.
What made my ears perk was not, specifically, the note about brisk holiday sales, but the reason he gave. He said "economists" credit "brisk sales" to "lower gas prices, increasing corporate benefits, tax cuts, and a skyrocketing stock market."
I almost fell out of my chair.
I'll avoid mentioning all the details or going off on a rant about how the hell "corporate benefits" really help average people, but I'd like to talk about these tax cuts for a second.
My company in the last year changed its salary structure so that people in my position have a base, hourly wage complimented by commissions. For most of us this actually meant an increase in gross pay because we'd been in the position of selling for quite awhile without receiving much proportional compensation for it, but it also meant a decrease in hourly wage or base salary. That is, I get an hourly wage with a set number of hours per week, and I might sell 100 "units" in a given pay period, and from that I'd make my hourly wage plus a set amount per unit, somewhere around a dollar, depending on the unit in question. (Some were worth more due to a higher profit margin.) The change dramatically increased the "per unit" commission and created a graduated scale so that, for example, if I sold 100 units I'd get X amount per unit, 120 units, y amount, 140 units z amount, etc. But rather than get the traditional hourly wage increase, the company relied on these commission increases to meet the contractual obligation of a certain percentage increase in gross pay per year served. In the end, those of us who did our jobs well made more.
In theory ...
A part of the recent tax changes *increased* the tax rate on commissions. For example, if I were married and claimed four deductions, my hourly wage would be taxed at something close to 13%. However, my commissions are taxed at 25% regardless of any other factors.
Result.
Lower take-home pay. Higher tax burden come April 15th.
Where's this tax cut of which he speaks?
Now, in all truth, paying 25% doesn't really bother me, or it wouldn't if those taxes were being used for something other than to finance the debt on a multi-billion dollar war in which we're killing people for no damn good reason. What does bother me is the suggestion that these tax cuts that actually mean a person in my position (lower-middle class at best) is paying more as a percentage of disposable income are being touted as this so-called reason for these so-called brisk sales for this so-called Christmas shopping season.
Liberal media? Where???
Feh. Rant over.
I've been a very bad American this year. Almost all my Christmas presents are "made by me" to one degree or another or were purchases of pre-purchased items, i.e. used books for the daughter. My daughter, bless her soul, hand made everything she's giving this year. I think she spent about $20, and she made stuff that would be purchased in stores for hundreds of dollars total.
Sorry if I'm sounding like a Scrooge, but this just floored me.
|