Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SD Secy of State already scheming to replace Tim Johnson

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kay1864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 10:56 AM
Original message
SD Secy of State already scheming to replace Tim Johnson
From CNN:

Although the issue of incapacitation is not spelled out in state law, South Dakota Secretary of State Chris Nelson said he believes there would be "precedent at the federal level."


Yes, he's a Repuke. And my guess is he got an phone call last night from KKKarl.

How about "It's premature to speculate, and our thoughts and prayers are with Senator Johnson and his family", Chris? But nooooo.... "we think there is precedent at the federal level to declare him incapacitated, and replace him with one of our own as soon as possible."

Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. it's his job to do this
figure out how best to have the people of the state of South Dakota represented in the Senate. nothing nefarious about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kay1864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. I was referring to his insensitive timing
He doesn't need to engage in this speculation unless (and it's a big unless) Sen. Johnson is physically unable to do his job.

And not until.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. They might at least wait until the Senate reconvenes in ...
Edited on Thu Dec-14-06 11:55 AM by Sentinel Chicken
January. The guy is just barely out of surgery. The anesthetic hasn't even worn off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #11
23. They removed his atheism?
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. OOPS!
Edited on Thu Dec-14-06 11:56 AM by Sentinel Chicken
Guess I kinda rushed the spell check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. His job to lie about it?
Ooops! I mean 'mis-lead' people.

There's a law for SD that it has to be a special election for the replacement. They may very well get one of 'their team' elected, but they can't just appoint them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. I thought that was the voters' job.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. it is not the voter's job
to determine if someone is medically incapacitated during their term. THe voters' job is to elect people, like secretaries of state, to make these sorts of determinations for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Is there a law allowing him to do that?
And is it his job to take what the voters' wanted and do the exact opposite?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. worth noting, I think
that the Secretary of State did not cause Senator Johnson's medical problems. So he didn't take anything away from the voters, whatever god you believe in did. and seems to have given him back, which is nice.

But hypothetically (and remember, the SoS simply said that there is Federal Precedent for an incapacitation removal, which would, of course, lead to a general election within 80-90 days of the vacancy, not an appointment, the rest of the post is a comment by the OP) laws simply refer to 'vacancy' which, in most cases, is from death or resignation. of couse, someone who is alive, but incapacitated, cannot resign. So, without a method to remove them, they stay in place, drawing a Federal salary and taking up half of the state's senate representation, without being able to represent anyone (can't vote, after all) until the next general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. You're kidding, right?
Since when have the Republicans been interested in what's best for the people they represent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
33. you might take note of the fact that, barring DEATH OR RESIGNATION by sen. johnson, there is NO
vacancy, and that asshole SOS in SD has NOTHING to do. PERIOD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. replace him with "one of our own?" WTF? Are they Pod People?
What the fuck, Mr. Nelson...aren't you an AMERICAN like the rest of us?

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
24. That was the part that
shows what an imbecile he is. "One of our own"..like a fucking bushbot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's time for Nelson to either get a clue or stop lying
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. precedent...
would be the case of the REPUBLICAN senator from SD that didn't step down when incapacitated in the 60's...

or even strom thurmond, at the federal level
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kay1864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yeah, but he was a member of the GOP!
So it's different, doncha see?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. bingo
What would be funny in a twisted way is if thay somehow forced Johnson out, Johnson recovered from his medical problem and then won the next Senate election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montanacowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. CNN said he was out for two years...
and Joe Biden out for seven months.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
9. Sickening. I can't believe it. I predict there will be a huge uprising among the populace.
Edited on Thu Dec-14-06 11:03 AM by Radio_Lady
This is just too big.

Two stolen elections and now in 2006 it might be inadvertently by Tim Johnson's brain that does us in after the successful mid-term elections. What are the odds on that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
28. Nah...I think Survivor is getting too good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
13. "I'm not dead."
Edited on Thu Dec-14-06 11:13 AM by Deep13
John Cleese: Here's one.
Eric Idle: That'll be ninepence.
Terry Gilliam: I'm not dead.
I: What?
C: Nothing. There's your ninepence.
G: I'm not dead.
I: 'Ere, he says he's not dead.
C: Yes he is.
G: I'm not.
I: He isn't.
C: Well, he will be soon, he's very ill.
G: I'm getting better.
C: No you're not, you'll be stone dead in a moment.
I: Well, I can't take him like that. It's against regulations.
G: I don't want to go on the cart.
C: Oh, don't be such a baby.
I: I can't take him.
G: I feel fine.
C: Oh, do me a favor.
I: I can't.
C: Well, can you hang around for a couple of minutes? He won't be long.
I: I promised I'd be at the Robinsons'. They've lost nine today.
C: Well, when's your next round?
I: Thursday.
G: I think I'll go for a walk.
C: You're not fooling anyone, you know. Isn't there anything you could do?
G: I feel happy. I feel happy.
(the Dead Collector glances up and down the street furtively, then silences the Body with his a whack of his club)
C: Ah, thank you very much.
I: Not at all. See you on Thursday.
C: Right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Thank you
for that.

Seems the Senator's surgery went quite well.

The Repubs need to settle down.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DakotaDemocrat Donating Member (330 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
18. Calm down.
Chris Nelson is not that bad. My experience with him is that he's fair and definitely as a grasp on the implications. To me, "one of our own" means a South Dakotan.

He was darn good at being unbiased throughout all the ballot measures this past year, from the abortion, anti-rights and all the other stuff we had on there. He and office went above and beyond trying to look and inform the public in an informative, neutral way.

If there's any problem in action, it would be in the timing. This is Sen. Johnson's decision (re: incapacity). This state had Karl Mundt for how many years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
19. Harry Reid said...
Johnson was HAPPY to see him!!!! Obviously, he knows what is going on around him and alert! GOP need to STFU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Another conspiracy thread
while the moderators aren't looking?

cool!

Has anyone tested the good senator for radiation? I hear we buy nuclear (and newcular) material from Russia, they got the good stuff.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
20. There should be an investigation and full blood panel done on Tim Johnson.
Too many of our leaders killed/harmed by Neocons and Republicans.

It also intimidates others, which of course those who engage in harming our leaders know. It creates cautious leadership where they scare our leaders into passing laws they wouldn't ordinarily pass like the police state evoking laws we now have on our books.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
25. "...one of our own..."???!!! I'm still reacting to that. Outraged, mind-boggled,
open-mouthed. As I have been for about 6 years. I'm beginning to think David Ickes is not so far wrong. Invasion of the Body Snatchers. These people are NOT HUMAN. They all think alike. They all vote alike. Like they emerged from "pods" with lots of goo attaching to them. Have the global corporate predators who are running all this been creating more than FrankenSeeds, in their diabolical laboratories? Have they been created POLITICIANS? With brains all cloned from Orrin Hatch? (He's not called "hatch" for nothing!).

This is damned creepy. "...one of our own..." I checked the OP. Then I checked it again. Yup, quotation marks. He actually said that. But no link. Gotta link, Kay1864?

They seem to think "pods" Delay and Hastert are still in charge--who would think nothing of stuffing an ailing Democrat into the oven, and replacing him with "one of our own." Or Arnold Schwarzenegger, who, after ELECTED Democratic Secretary of State Kevin Shelley was "swifted-boated" out of office in California--for suing Diebold and demanding to see their source code--appointed a REPUBLICAN and Diebold shill, Bruce McPherson to that office. (Of course, he had the eager cooperation of the Democratic leadership in the state legislature--2 to 1, and 3 to 2 Dem majorities--whom, one can only presume, were bought and paid for. What would our federal Dems do if they tried this shit over Johnson's Senate seat? Hard to predict. I mean, we know what we would WANT them to do--but would they?).

But I have to renege on the "not human" remark--much as Bushites resemble fungi. We've got to realize that they ARE human, that this herd mentality is human, just like Bush's psycho slaughter of tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis, and Cheney's insatiable greed, are human. We might like to evolve past these traits--and I do think that's where we're going--but meanwhile we are cursed in the universe for continuing to produce human beings whose deep flaws make us unfit to join the Federation. We have a couple of generations to go, I think--if we make it that far. (50 years to the death of the planet--that's what the World Wildlife Fund says (--and they take corporate money--imagine what they would say if they didn't.).)

(Just saw "inconvenient Truth." My God, what have we done?! WHAT. HAVE. WE. DONE. ??!!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kay1864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
27. Geez people...
Do you REALLY think a state official commenting to CNN, and who might soon be under the microscope as much as Katherine Harris in 2000, would use the phrase "replace him with one of our own as soon as possible"?

Yes, Chris Nelson said he believes there would be "precedent at the federal level." (that's the part in the quote box from CNN)

The rest of it is my post (that's the part NOT in the quote box from CNN).

Yes, I thought about adding a sarcasm smiley, but I thought everyone would understand hyperbole.

Either way, Chris Nelson is a bit too eager here in deciding on being Sen. Johnson's replaced. And such "precedent" is up for a judge to decide, not him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Thanks for clarifying, Kay1864. And, yes, I REALLY think a "state official
commenting to CNN, and who might be under the microscope as much as Katherine Harris in 2000" would use the phrase "replace him with one of our own as soon as possible." I have heard so many outrageous and unbelievable things out of Republicans' mouths these last six years that nothing would surprise me.

I have heard them justify torture. I have seen them vote for torture and for suspension of habeas corpus (one of the main items at issue in the American Revolution). I have seen them call Democrats racists for opposing Condi Rice as Sec of State. I have seen them squish tens of the thousands of black voters, on the one hand, and assert Republican gains among black voters, on the other. I have seen them describe slaughtering a hundred thousand innocent people as bringing them liberty. I have seen them call Max Cleland a friend of Osama bin Laden. I have seen them call electronic voting owned and controlled by Bushite corporations the "Help America Vote Act." I have seen them paint the white roses red, like the Red Queen in "Alice in Wonderland." I have seen them say "War = peace," as in Orwell's "1984." I have seen Donald Rumsfeld state that "Freedom = the freedom to loot." I have heard falseness, lies, deceptions, distortions and hypocrisies such as I have never heard in my lifetime, and I lived through the Vietnam War. I have seen such egregious assertions of unaccountable power--from presidential "signing statements," to Halliburton's no-bid contracts, to the non-budgeted military budget, to indefinite detention, to pervasive domestic spying, as to boggle the mind. And I have seen such naked assertions of political fascism--by Jeb Bush, and George, by Dick Cheney, by Tom Delay, by Kenneth Blackwell, by Katherine Harris, by Dennis Hastert, by Alberto Gonzales, by John Ashcroft, by Donald Rumsfeld, by Karl Rove, and others, and by a gang of their rotweillers in the corporate news monopolies--as to make my country unrecognizable.

Is it any surprise that I and others expect the worst?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Advice: So I guess you'd better use the "sarcasm" button when mocking...
...Republicans. (They're so bad they can't even be mocked.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
31. Is he referring to Chimp?
"we think there is precedent at the federal level to declare him incapacitated, and replace him..."

This is referring to BushCo right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
32. How do this filthy Repigs look in the mirror much less have the self-respect to
meet family members at Holiday gatherings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
34. What does he mean by "precedent at the federal level"?
Edited on Thu Dec-14-06 06:18 PM by MJDuncan1982
Is he making the distinction between what would happen in the case of a S.D. State Senator as opposed to a S.D. U.S. Senator?

Or is he saying there is some sort of precedential value attached to the way in which other states deal with this issue (regarding U.S. Senators)?

First of all, no "precedent" is created by other states' actions for any other state. Second, if this magical "precedent" did exist, the explicit law of the state of S.D. would trump (as this "precedent" would surely be extremely weak).

I don't quite understand what he means here...other than: "There is only one way we can get what we want and that is to rely upon the least persuasive argument."

Edit: Clarity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC