THERE HAS BEEN MUCH DISCUSSION ON THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SAUDI AMBASSADOR PRINCE TURKI AL-FAISAL'S ABRUPT EXIT FROM THE US RECENTLY AND STEVE CLEMONS (WASHINGTON NOTE FAME) GIVES SOME INTERESTING INSIGHT:
Prince Bandar Allegedly Advocating Military Response Against Iran
Steve Clemons
READ MORE: Iraq, Dick Cheney, Israel, George W. Bush
(Close aide to Saudi National Security Advisor Bandar bin Sultan, Rihab Massoud)
The escalating tension between Prince Bandar bin Sultan, the current Saudi National Security Advisor and former Saudi Ambassador to the United States, and Prince Turki al-Faisal, who only this this week resigned his position as Saudi Ambassador in Washington, is taking some new and disturbing turns.
An Associated Press story written by Cairo-based correspondent Salah Nasrawi cites a Saudi official as saying that:
Many in the royal family concluded that if he stayed longer, things might even get worse.
While the AP story cites only one official with "close working ties with the Saudi Foreign Ministry," the comment sounds seriously at odds with the reports that I have been receiving from dozens of Saudi commentators within and around the Saudi royal family and foreign ministry.
What is clear from reports is that while King Abdullah did not stop an escalation in tensions between Bandar and Turki, no one pushed Turki to leave or resign. In fact, the King expected Prince Turki to find his own way of dealing with Bandar and his staff -- not to resign. If anything, Turki's resignation forces the King to find a way to reconnect Turki and his clan of brothers back to the regent and will probably cause damage to Bandar's loftier ambitions.
-snip
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-clemons/prince-bandar-allegedly-a_b_36364.html