|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
kpete (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 06:03 PM Original message |
EXCLUSIVE: White House Forbids Publication Of Op-Ed On Iran By Former CIA Official (Think Progress) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tempest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
1. Can he post it in a blog? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 07:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. Just checked No Quarter to see if Larry Johnson has chimed in on this one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 07:12 PM Response to Reply #1 |
12. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
minnesota_liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 03:44 PM Response to Reply #12 |
39. Why the hell not? (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 08:50 PM Response to Reply #12 |
57. I Guess We Should All Be Grateful Tom Paine Didn't Ask for George III's Permission |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
2. OK, NOW can we call them Nazis? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 06:18 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 10:15 AM Response to Reply #2 |
19. For sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sirveri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 02:37 PM Response to Reply #19 |
36. He is still bound by certain rules. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 02:45 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. The CIA itself already said it was not classified information. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sirveri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 08:45 PM Response to Reply #37 |
56. I agree 100%, just saying that he's not fully off the leash |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
followthemoney (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 09:22 PM Response to Reply #36 |
58. Read the story again. CIA says it is OK. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Gauger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 06:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
49. Prior restraint is not allowed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 11:54 PM Response to Reply #49 |
62. I think they all know this, except the article isn't clear about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 06:13 PM Response to Original message |
3. I think he should publish anyway and sue them if they come after him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 06:52 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Let's not forget that the TImes withheld inciminating evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 09:53 AM Response to Reply #7 |
16. They withheld a lot before the 2004 election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 06:57 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Any court would easily slap it down on 1st Amendment rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 04:26 PM Response to Reply #3 |
44. TheWH and MSM have tried to silence Leverett before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 06:20 PM Response to Original message |
5. If it's cleared by the Agency, he can publish. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 11:48 AM Response to Reply #5 |
26. The position |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 04:08 PM Response to Reply #26 |
43. Are you saying that the Director of National Intelligence (Negroponte) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 02:47 PM Response to Reply #5 |
38. "Leverett’s op-ed has already been cleared by the CIA." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 04:04 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. You misread my comment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
6. Counting the days until January & SUBPOENA power! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caligirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
8. so he helps dumb*ss embarrass himself further by letting us know the idiot son |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kikosexy2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
10. Try... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
5X (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 08:53 AM Response to Original message |
13. K & R, mostly because thinkprogress is now down.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MetaTrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
14. And yet the White House released to the NYT the identity of an undercover CIA operative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zambero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
15. Is this yet another re-definition of executive privilege? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nuxvomica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
17. Their unqualified use of the term "engage" really had me confused |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maestro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
18. If the CIA approved it (I didn't know they had to), what is the reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 11:01 AM Response to Reply #18 |
23. Regarding the CIA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tecelote (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
20. When we're done bringing democracy to Iraq... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
21. If the New York Times had any courage and/or integrity, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
22. If it's not illegal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
24. If there is a legal issue in the way - ideas are ideas, he could |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OregonBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
25. Here is NYT contact link. Let them know what you think. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 02:45 AM Response to Reply #25 |
66. thanks for the link. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monmouth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
27. I'm sure I'm being naive here and missed another post explaining why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 12:23 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. it is a puzzle. unless they cited 'nat. security" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
29. ThinkProgress site down? I can't get to the link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
file83 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 01:07 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Yes it is, and it's STILL down... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 08:40 AM Response to Reply #31 |
69. Back up now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
file83 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
30. Do we have a genuine 'information war' going on here? Did thinkprogress publish the article anyway? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Witch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
32. K&Red, because now think progress is down.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 02:10 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tbyg52 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 04:07 PM Response to Reply #32 |
42. Looks like perhaps it's just a coincidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geardaddy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
34. Buh-bye First Amendment! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
35. Ah, now they're working on the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CompassionateLib (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
40. Non story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 04:43 PM Response to Reply #40 |
45. its an OP-ED using public statements and info thats already out there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CompassionateLib (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 06:51 PM Response to Reply #45 |
51. As I understand the rules... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Witch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 10:43 PM Response to Reply #51 |
60. It's just one more to add to the pile, that's all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PegDAC (906 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 05:59 PM Response to Reply #51 |
78. He DID submit it for CIA approval, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 05:19 PM Response to Reply #40 |
48. If it's a non-story (in your opinion) and it's public info, why do you not see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CompassionateLib (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 07:03 PM Response to Reply #48 |
52. Thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OregonBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 07:08 PM Response to Reply #40 |
53. Per the story Leverett’s op-ed has already been cleared by the CIA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 02:57 AM Response to Reply #40 |
67. yes, let's ignore all the crimes bush has committed and we'll just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CompassionateLib (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 12:29 PM Response to Reply #67 |
70. Smile? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 08:23 AM Response to Reply #40 |
68. Welcome to DU CompassionateLib. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CompassionateLib (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 12:42 PM Response to Reply #68 |
71. Cool |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:06 PM Response to Reply #71 |
73. So when you join the CIA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CompassionateLib (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 02:16 PM Response to Reply #73 |
76. I said... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 04:11 PM Response to Reply #76 |
77. So you said that anybody who joins the CIA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CompassionateLib (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 06:37 PM Response to Reply #77 |
79. These agreements have been in place... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crunchy Frog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 08:41 PM Response to Reply #79 |
80. Agreements to submit the material to CIA approval |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CompassionateLib (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 09:43 AM Response to Reply #80 |
82. Thanks... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
46. U.S. media went from Defend our Rights - to - Facilitate Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CompassionateLib (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 12:50 PM Response to Reply #46 |
72. Curious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:36 PM Response to Reply #72 |
74. You're curious and I'm confused - I'm talking about the newspaper. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
47. Heil Hitler y'all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Counciltucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
50. Don't forget: Bush's power is more important than our freedom of speech. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Up2Late (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
54. Related Video: Stephen Colbert's "So You're Living in a Police State" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrJJ (657 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
55. Our DOD at Work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrJJ (657 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
59. Propoganda Report |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 11:49 PM Response to Original message |
61. ..."blocking the publication..."??? WTF? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yukari Yakumo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 12:07 AM Response to Reply #61 |
64. You have a point on 6. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 12:02 AM Response to Original message |
63. Thta's ok, after January 8th 2007 oversight will be reinstalled, Bush bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 02:24 AM Response to Original message |
65. that fucking liberal new york times media screws up again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
75. PNAC fascism in action. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DerwinUMD (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 05:43 AM Response to Reply #75 |
81. Its two day later, and I still can't get the link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:07 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC