|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
MOB (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 01:39 PM Original message |
Kucinich on the war in '02 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
1. link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 02:42 PM Response to Reply #1 |
20. Here's a great link to DK's 2002 stance: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MOB (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 03:04 PM Response to Reply #20 |
26. And don't forget Hezbollah! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 08:06 PM Response to Reply #26 |
34. Graham also wanted to invade Saudi Arabia instead of Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
2. I appreciated Graham, and said so at the time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MOB (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 01:49 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. There were other ways to be anti-war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 02:34 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. I'm not anti-war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
4. This is a fantastic thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MOB (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 01:57 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Meaning? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 02:04 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Meaning how can we discuss a person when there's another person. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MOB (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 02:10 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. An Inconvenient Truth @ Kucinich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 02:23 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. I have an idea: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MOB (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 02:26 PM Original message |
But this about kucinich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MOB (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 02:26 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. But this about kucinich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
7. And the award for "Dumbest Thread of the Week" goes to.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MOB (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 02:12 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Why not just defend Kucinich? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EstimatedProphet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
12. Well, I was anti-war in '02, and I predicted all of what has happened |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MOB (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 02:34 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. but still Kucinich is the only anti-war voice! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 02:38 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. So you wrote all of this nonsense to say that Americans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MOB (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 02:39 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. You're smarter than that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 02:46 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. Look, Mr. Mob. Nobody knows what this thread is about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MOB (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 03:13 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. why Kucinich is a poor candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EstimatedProphet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 06:36 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. BTW if you want a party that fails to have diverse opinion about Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 06:43 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. I read the thread. It's like looking at random words. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EstimatedProphet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 02:40 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. I didn't want to get into that, but good point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EstimatedProphet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 02:39 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. If you feel that way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MOB (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 02:40 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. But Graham isn't running! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EstimatedProphet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 02:45 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Again, so what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MOB (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 02:53 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Again, you're not defending Kucinich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrazyForKucinich (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 02:56 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. As a Kucinich supporter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MOB (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 03:00 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. ummm kay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EstimatedProphet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 06:33 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. I don't think ANYONE is a serious candidate yet! It's 2006! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 08:05 PM Response to Original message |
31. How was Graham on the drug war? On the death penalty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 05:14 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Graham voted against the IWR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vanje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
32. Because, Graham is retired from politics? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC