Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

They don't need any advice.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-16-06 07:11 PM
Original message
They don't need any advice.
It's the perfect set-up, but there won't be any winners.

W screws up the Iraq War big-time. The people are pissed. Things are looking bad. Ta-Da! Poppy sends in James Baker and the Bipartisans to try to save the day. JB and the Bi's produce recommendations--not perfect, but enough to provide a foundation for changing the course of W's Debacle.

Pssssh, fizzle, splat!

+++++++

Bush likely to reject study group call for withdrawal from Iraq

Suzanne Goldenberg in Washington
Saturday December 16, 2006
The Guardian


The White House was yesterday considering an even deeper military commitment in Iraq, with a short-term deployment of 20,000 extra forces to Baghdad, a day after the US army chief warned that the force could break under the strain of the war.
Meanwhile, the US secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice, ruled out a diplomatic overture to Syria and Iran to enlist their support in stemming the chaos in Iraq.

The two developments reinforce reports that the White House is leaning towards a broad rejection of the recommendations from the Iraq Study Group for a withdrawal of US combat forces by early 2008, and for the opening of talks with Tehran and Damascus.

Although George Bush has yet to reveal his new strategy for the war, deferring that announcement to the New Year, Ms Rice indicated that the administration's highly visible review of its policies in Iraq is unlikely to lead to major changes.

<more>

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,1973461,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-16-06 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Two years from now...
We'll be discussing how the extra troops were supposed to be a "short-term deployment," but were never removed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC