stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 10:30 AM
Original message |
New Rethug Talking Point, calling Liberals "Secular Progressives" |
|
Edited on Wed Feb-01-06 10:31 AM by stop the bleeding
Stephanie Miller has highlighted this comment from a couple of Faux news programs from yesterday. She also just had a caller say the same thing that this seems to be a new term to make us look even worse.
I guess people figured out that Liberal is not a bad word - see founding fathers for reference, but "Secular Progressives" sounds more like hey they are not on our side ect..
What is everyone's take on this?
|
BurgherHoldtheLies
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 10:31 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Don't let them make it a bad word. |
|
Nothing wrong with secular progressive...better than a Rapturist right wingnut theocratic neocon.
|
GrpCaptMandrake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. "Rapturist right wingnut theocratic neocon" |
|
you for got to add "freak" to that.
Cuz, after all, they *are* freaks.
|
Kansas Wyatt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
6. Better than a 'Regressive Rapturist' |
|
To be more accurate. Sounds like they are flirting with the idea of turning the word "progressive" into a dirty demon, like they did with "liberal," in all of their parroted gas.
|
TechBear_Seattle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 10:32 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Most liberals are people of faith |
|
Of course, the Rethuglycans define "secular" to mean, "Anyone who does not wholeheartedly agree that we must be governed exclusively by extremely conservative, rigidly literal and fanatically held Christian beliefs, as taught by MY church, not yours."
|
DKStreet
(95 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 10:33 AM
Response to Original message |
3. I would proudly wear that banner |
|
and if it bothers "them", so much the better.
|
melissinha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 10:36 AM
Response to Original message |
5. finally using the right label |
|
Edited on Wed Feb-01-06 10:36 AM by melissinha
no more "them liburuls"
we are for secular progressive government. right on target.
|
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 10:38 AM
Response to Original message |
7. the opposite being "Theocratic Regressives"? |
|
ok, I'll take that label.
|
JHB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 10:40 AM
Response to Original message |
8. It's a new way to paint halos on their heads. |
|
The goal is to associate religion with themselves, and only themselves.
|
Rose Siding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 10:40 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Weren't they pulling for the "Secular Progressives" in Iraq? |
BurgherHoldtheLies
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. Game. Set. Match. GREAT point!!!! |
linazelle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 10:43 AM
Response to Original message |
11. The good thing is their "base" doesnt even know what that means |
|
They can hardly spell. I'm SerIEs!!!
:rofl:
|
zbdent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:00 AM
Response to Original message |
12. and the righties are "seclusionist regressives" . . . |
ourbluenation
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:03 AM
Response to Original message |
13. Every single elected democrat is a person of faith. |
|
It's a fact. Jack. Call then on there bs
|
Strawman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:05 AM
Response to Original message |
14. I think Jesus would want them to just do their jobs and govern better |
|
Edited on Wed Feb-01-06 11:09 AM by Strawman
Imagine if someone at your work who sucked at their job tried to distract attention from their poor performance everytime he or she screwed up by attacking the religious affiliation of their competent colleagues. That sure wouldn't fly pretty much anywhere. It's completely absurd and anyone in their right mind would think that person was taking them for a complete idiot.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:28 PM
Response to Original message |