...On the other hand, we may be needing prayer rugs and veils within the yearAre you suggesting that Iran, with an annual military budget of less than 1% of the United States', will be able to mount an invasion of the United States? Because if you are, you're frankly either stupid or crazy.
(I can't remember the name of person interviewed offhand, but I can look it up if you like). While our country may have many flaws and be run by power-hungry, unethical white men, I'd rather have all my legs and limbs in tact.So would our soldiers.
I just watched a video called "Voices of Iraq". Basically, the producers just gave out video cameras to the ordinary citizens in various regions of Iraq. They were allowed to say what they wanted, and some questions were asked of them as well. Unlike in Iran's videos where the children shout death to America, the children of Iraq like the US.This is simply untrue. Any poll will tell you this. Nine out of ten Iraqis hate us. Conversely, the United States enjoys mild popularity among the Iranians--or did, before the invasion of Iraq.
It also showed people's heads and hands being chopped off during Saddam's reign. Did you know Iraq was banned from competing in a fairly recent Olympics because Saddam often harmed and/or murdered the athletes?That's shocking. And untrue. Iraq has competed in every Summer Olympics since 1980.
I'd rather live in a country that pays their athletes way too much, wouldn't you?I wasn't aware that anyone was suggesting that you had to move to Iraq. In fact, you don't. However, there are quite a few Americans who
do have to go to Iraq. We call them "soldiers." Wouldn't you rather they come home?
I'm glad more troops are possibly going into Iraq. If we don't fight to win there, 9/11 will seem like a campfire compared to the horrible vision of fire Iran's leaders have as they plan the next move to start the apocolpyse (spelling?).Fight to win from whom? Who are we fighting? Iran is not related to Al-Qaeda--in fact, they're on opposite sides of the Iraqi conflict. Al-Qaeda supports the Sunnis in Iraq. Iran supports the Shi'ites. The Sunnis and Shi'ites are at war with each other. Who do we support? Do we fight the Iran-backed Shi'ites, supporting the Sunni terrorists? Or do we fight the Sunni terrorists, supporting Iran? Do we fight both parties? Because that would be fighting the entire population of Iraq.
I've seen the clips Iran has been showing to their people, specifically their children, and chills ran up my spine. I also couldn't watch the interview on 60 minutes with the President of Iran without the same feeling. He's EVIL and he's toying with us like a cat before it kills a mouse.
And how would he kill us? With rhetoric?
And now I've seen Iraq's people speak out. I don't see how I can get any closer to the real story which is how these people want the same things we have (for the most part)Well, you could look at polls of the Iraqi people to find out how they think. But you might not like their responses
....security, freedom and prosperity, etc. They want our helpWRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG.
http://www.turkishdailynews.com.tr/article.php?enewsid=59894and they deserve a chance at a better life after what Saddam has done to them.Yes, they do. And in order for that to happen, we have to leave.
Most of the news shows only the bombings and concentrates on the number of deaths. That's why I don't watch them. I don't want to be brainwashed into thinking it's all bad news just because it's a war.So you don't watch the news. You have no idea what's going on. You just saw a bunch of pro-US Iraqis, who are vastly outnumbered, given cameras. You know what we call that? Antecdotal evidence. And it's worthless.
It's no wonder the majority of the US want out based on these reports. I don't like war any more than you do, but we can't talk to them because they'd rather die and be martyrs. Who are "they?" The Sunnis? Or the Shi'ites? Because they're totally different, and most of the violence there is Sunnis killing Shi'ites and Shi'ites killing Sunnis.
I've heard the quotes from the President of Iran. He warns all of us to bow down before him and become Islamists or else we will be destroyed. In Islam, we'd be invisible. Or if we defied the religion, dead.Really? I can't seem to find any quotes from Mahmoud Ahmadinejad saying that. I think you made that up. Moreover, "Islamist" does not mean what you think it does. An "Islamist" is someone who wants everyone in the world to become a Muslim. You can't possibly make someone Islamist--that's not even the goal of Islamists.
Questions for you. What do you think will happen if we don't win in Iraq? Or maybe I should ask what do you think will happen if we leave Iraq? There will be a nasty civil war between the Sunnis and the Shi'ites. The Shi'ites will win. They will be friendly to Iran. Iran, Iraq, Syria (because of Hezbollah), and Lebanon will form a Shi'ite-dominated power bloc. The rest of the Muslim world, being Sunni, will unite against them. This will set the stage for either a bloodbath or a cold war. This is very unfortunate. But our continued presence is not helping the situation in any way. Our best bet is to attempt to negotiate a power-sharing agreement, bring Syria, the Saudis, and Iran into the political process, and draw down our forces. Hopefully we'll only leave a cold war and not a hot one.
What are your news sources saying the consequences to leaving will be? Who do your sources believe are our enemies and allies?No news source would declare what the future would be. If it does, it's not a news source, it's an opinion source. And relying on opinions for news is dangerous. As for the second question, it's kind of meaningless. There are neither enemies or allies in politics. There are only players with their own goals.
NONE of the people in the Iraq Study Group (stupid name, if you ask me) have military experience.First of all, this is untrue. Perry was SecDef, and Panetta, Robb, and Baker all served. However, neither Bush nor Cheney served. What was your point again?