Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I have a deep, gut feeling that Bush is going to be impeached..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
BlueStorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 08:48 PM
Original message
I have a deep, gut feeling that Bush is going to be impeached..
and/or resign.

This isn't wishful thinking nor is it meant to be something flammatory.

I just wanted to say something that has been on my mind all day and have this need to share it.

I have had this feeling even before the 2004 elections, it has been with me for a long time and I have never told anyone about it and I was afraid to post it here on DU.

I do believe that there are going to be investigations and what they are going to reveal are going to be something that are beyond the scope of our imaginations, even what we already see now and what we have speculated here on DU. That the pile of shit is so deep that we can't or won't be able to wrap our minds around it. Truly I believe that it is going to be of historic proportions.

The events that have been recently happening, Rumsfeld resigning, more abuse reports of detainees, the even more grim news coming out of Iraq etc. etc. It all seems to be escalating to something. Something that is so big that it would make Watergate and Nixon seem like a walk in the park.

I don't know if any of you on DU feel the same way. I mean these feelings have been very strong. I even told my mother during the 2004 elections that Bush is going to end up getting impeached and/or resign. My mom doesn't believe me as she says that "no President has gotten impeached before so why would they now?"

Maybe I will be right, maybe I will be wrong. So who knows.

And why do I feel like I've posted this before?!

Blue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. (/atheism) From your mouth to God's ears (atheism)
Edited on Mon Dec-18-06 08:50 PM by jgraz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. From your lips
to the Goddess's ears
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Personally I don't think there is anyway that Bush will be impeached
And I highly doubt he'll resign. A Dem push to impeach Bush would be very unwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buff2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. Why?
He's committed so many crimes and has spit on the constitution and the Bill of rights......he has blatantly done the opposite of what a President is supposed to do....are you saying that he is too good to be impeached for all the WRONG he has done and that the Dems don't have the right to DEMAND impeachment? I wish bu$h would get a BJ...that would be JUST CAUSE for impeachment!! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. I'm saying it would be politically stupid..........
not saying that getting a BJ is worse than what Bush has done, and I'm not saying that he hasn't committed impeachable offenses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. I agree
and the Democrats would pay for it for elections to come. "Tit for tat" then they would try and impeach the next Democratic president, on and on it would go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. agreed, and I think it would cost us the White House in '08
there is a reason the Repubs want the Dems to pursue impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #29
62. Country trumps party.
Remember The Constitution!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #29
67. Yeah it would be politically unwise
It's more important to rescind legislation Bush has put in and try to straighten out his messes of the last 6 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #67
69. Kudos
and correcto. Fix what little lord flaunly roid has broken. Get back on topic. I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
33. Well, let's hear it for feet of clay! Let's sprinkle holy water on the pasta-spined!
Edited on Mon Dec-18-06 09:35 PM by TahitiNut
:applause: Yum! Al Dente! :applause:


:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patchuli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #33
56. You got that right!
We have an absolute moral obligation as American patriots to our Constitution to pursue impeachment against an official behaving in a criminal manner. That other thinking and projection of what 'others will think' is just nuckin' futs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 03:05 AM
Response to Reply #56
70. No one is going to IMPEACH!
What happened to Sharon's trial at the World Court? He dropped off the radar.

We have to pray them out of existance. Athiest beware. There is a balance. There is law and order. It gets very dirty sometimes, but it is there. Work with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patchuli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #70
91. No one thought Nixon would be impeached either
yet when they began the proceedings, it made it easier for us.

Betcha we will...or he will resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 03:12 AM
Response to Reply #33
72.  It's not feet of clay. Losing in 2008 and appearing vengeful
( or whatever you want to call it) gets the country back with the Republicans in power. People want to see a Congress act, not do impeachments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patchuli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #72
90. Didn't work that way when they tried to impeach Clinton
They ended up in power (fair or not) so I don't think that argument holds any water. We need to stop * before he kills more and destroys more. It IS our obligation to remove him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
42. On an August night in 1974 I bowed out of the monthly
Edited on Mon Dec-18-06 10:30 PM by truedelphi
Watch Dick-The Crook on TV and party to it(Loyola University ara, Chicago)

Couldn't handle one more evening wasted throwing popcorn at the TV
screen while friends with better wits than me cracked hilarious jokes.

I felt sad that the only thing left of my democracy was my friends' sense ofhumor. Took a walk on the Lake Shore.

Suddenly a Yell, loud and thorough, resonated through the canyons of Chi-Town apartments. It was as though Chi-town's baseball teams (The CUbs? The Sox? BOTH OF THEM??) had just clinched the World Series.

A thrill went through me - and I realized I'd missed History.

The Crook was resigning!

NEVER GIVE UP!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ani Yun Wiya Donating Member (639 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
66. I have a better idea than impeaching *.
Impeaching the head criminal is one thing, a small thing.
How about that new Dem majority working to make the Republican Party illegal ?

After all without all those asshats to support the assahat-in-chief where would he be ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamidue Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
86. Impeachment means nothing, I guess.
If you can impeach a president for lying about an affair, but not for lying a country into war, then the whole system is broken and meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. I've been wondering if Bush will go publicly insane
or rather, insane to a degree where even the apologists can't cover for it anymore, and will have to be removed from office...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Homer Wells Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
48. I've been watching * lately,
and I notice that he seems very depressed.

Just listen to his voice, and observe the petulant, almost resigned expression on his face.

Wouldn't be surprised to hear that he is talking to the portraits in the White house late at night.

Not to mention excess drinking.:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
58. Yup, even before he was sworn in we knew he was too weak.
If he gets too nuts I think the handlers will arrange a tragic bicycling while pretzel-eating accident for him. Much sympathy to be gained.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thank you!
It is a tipping point. There is no way they can get away with this dastard deeds.
Think of Hitler. Yes, he had grave injustices. But what was his end? He had an ending.

Yes, I too believe that the tipping point will come for the current rulers in theif.
Five of Swords. Rock on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badgerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
59. For some reason, I don't see him finishing out his term.
I don't know how to explain it, but the 'balance' is tipped way too far to allow him to do so. Think avalanche. One too many pebbles will start the whole shebang moving, and there's a LOT of rocks here ready to...well, ROCK.

Whether it's by impeachment, resignation, or removal by intervention, or something else,
I just don't see Bush finishing out this term.
It doesn't 'feel' (smell? sound?) like it. :shrug:

So much for objectivity. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #59
64. I'm not into astrology, but astrologists predicted in 2000 that he would NOT
finish out his presidency.

You may be on to something.

Will be interesting....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #59
68. The tipping point
was a book written about 5-6 years ago. Former rm got it. Boring reading, but I got the gist.

I believe Bush will finish his term and get in the helicopter and take off for parts unknown.
Wish I could predict differntly.

I was feeling my oats with the former post.

We have two more years of torture. THEN the tipping point will balance.

If it doesn't, then Katy get the door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Something that is so big"
Maybe It Has One Possibility.

(oops, I'm not allowed to say that! bad me.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Yes
Methinks It's His Only Plan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
54. *cough*
Lately, I Have Overtly Pondered such a notion, or one similar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. I believe every member of the evil cabal should be impeached and thus
inoculate our government from another infection by these crazy zealots.
I do not believe the Idiot bush will ever leave by his own volition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. I suspect you are correct, but it will be the GOP doing it out of
fear that America will not forget just how sycophantic (psycho-frantic?) they have been for 6 years. The public will take it out the only way they can - on the GOoPers themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. Put me down for $100 to "resign"
He's going to lose it after January, the Dems are going to destroy his little fantasy world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 03:23 AM
Response to Reply #9
73. Sweet . fantasy .. baby needs a new pair of shoes!
IOW, bring it on home. I'm a gambler. Want on your action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brettdale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. Bush*t will never resigned
He will try to do anything tohang on to power and he wont be impeached, any democrat who tries this will be eaten alive by the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. I've had a feeling
that the truth will come out--and that there will be repercussions that go far beyond our own country. So I'd say your intuition is tapping into the same feeling my intuition is tapping into.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Road Scholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think he'll resign to avoid prosecution. The investigations will
reveal criminal activity of epic proportions.:nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. Yes they will
Edited on Mon Dec-18-06 09:17 PM by conscious evolution
Dems in Congress are sitting on mountains of evidence.
Didn't Levin say he is going to hold two or three hearings aday?That is a lot of info that is going to be presented to the public and that is only one committee.Multiply that by how many committees that we will be in control of?
However many it is it spells disaster for bushco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 03:50 AM
Response to Reply #22
76. mmmmmmm!
Sweet aroma of justice. They took the towers down. And have done NOTHING, but make a show and take attack on an independent nation.

If Justice reigns, let it begin now. And so it is. (this or something better for all involved).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. Plus they'll isolate him as crony after crony gets picked off
thrown out of office, sent to prison.

Democrats also might balk at funding any of his lunacy, but that's a huge "might," given their jellyfish nature of late.

All we can really count on are investigations. While Stupid is in office, he'll make sure none of the hideously anti-American stuff he signed into law will be overturned. A man who didn't cast a single veto for nearly six years will do nothing else for the last two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjornsdotter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. I hope so n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
14. There also is the feeling that the govt. after 2008 or so
is going to be more um... progressive? I think that we are going to have a more "We The People" stance than we have in the past few decades. More like what our Founding Fathers intended. Perhaps our government will be more senatorial. I can't explain it, it's weird. I have had this kind of thing popping in my head for the past few months.

Maybe Sylvia Browne will know.

Blue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
15. I will have to vote this up because it is so beautiful.
Thanks for sharing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sperk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. I'm still thinking he's gonna go out like James Baker (the preacher)
in a fetal position under his desk. He's not man enough to handle impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
17. Personally I am hoping for federal maximum security prison. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
18. You are right
Come January when Sen. Rockefeller releases the pre-war Iraq intel and the
NSA spying "stuff" it is going to be all over for *. Cheney is toast because
of all the over-billing by Halliburton.

I know a republican nationally known political scientist @ a major university
who thinks that bush's failure to follow the I.S.G. report will cook his goose
because that report was written to give him cover to change his mind and
he blew it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. Not just overbilling
Cheney is implicated in Bribery during his tenure at Halliburton.Bribery is one of two crimes specificly listed as impeachable offences in the US Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. That $200 million in Nigeria for oil & gas?
Edited on Mon Dec-18-06 09:46 PM by Botany
The off shore "mail box companies" so they could keep doing biz
w/ Iran?

The insider deals as V.P. to get Halliburton into Iraq?

The KBR billing for 30,000 meals while dishing out 8,000?

KBR's 45% of all billing going to overhead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. exactly
Probable more.
I can see a RICO statute charges in his future.If continous,ongoing criminal activities are taking place that makes it a Racketeering Influenced Criminal Organization.
They will be exposed as the gangsters they truly are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #27
55. Well, he was implicated in *giving* bribes, wasn't he?
I don't think the sense of that passage is about giving bribes but about receiving them. Giving bribes is 3/4 of diplomacy, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 03:58 AM
Response to Reply #27
77. I'm getting excited now ..
Edited on Tue Dec-19-06 03:59 AM by votesomemore
but you remember Iran/Contra? Reagan did not lose office. He went all bonkers later, which was his just due. What came of that whole scenario was that Chuck Colson started a prison ministry. It has it's good points? But the evangelism is a sticking point for me.

In fact, we are dealing with the same band of looters now! They recycled.

NOTHING happened. Swept under the rug. How apropos that * did a gig with a rug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #77
82. Small correction
Reagan was the first president to tell the truth when he said he did not recall. His Alzhemiers was on the early stages by the end of the first term, if you know anything abuot it.

You could see early signs of it by the sixth year, and after that the handlers kept him prety much out of the picture and you can bet senior was running the show

As to the it was swept under the rug, it should not... but that is another story

Oh and I do not wish alzheimers on anybody... it is a horrible way to go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 05:21 AM
Response to Reply #82
84. Senior who?
I felt bad about wishing Alzheimers on anyone. I really don't. My beloved grandmother is out of her mind. She's almost 99.

My point, I hope, was that we are dealing with the same band of robbers that Reagan spawned. IOW, they recycled. They are baaaaak.

Even though I have comfort for the suffering, what of those who push suffering? Is that okay?

Who is 'senior'? I missed that part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #84
85. Another small corection
this band of robbers did not come from the Reagan administration, but truly started with Nixon, Rummy the Dummy, under secretary of defense in the Nixon admin for example

As to senior, that was George Bush Senior, he ran the show best case scneario for the last four years, worst case scneario, for almost 12 years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 06:06 AM
Response to Reply #77
88. It all being swept under a rug
is a real risk.
This time,however,I don't think that is the case.I think that the citizens of this country have had enough of bushco and will not stand for a surge in broom sales.
Especially with the blogosphere screaming to the high heavens about the crimes committed in our name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cadmium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
21. Sometimes I get the same feeling. The Bushies are better at
stonewallng than Nixon but they are also more flagrant. I wonder if he can get away with another prolonged (re: pre-Katrina) vacation. He is getting frayed and even sounding a bit more impaired than usual. He could get impeached but then not convicted in the Senate. I dont think he will go gently like Nixon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
24. I don't
and he won't resign either. I see him twisting in the wind for the next two years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Road Scholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
25. I think when the shit does hit the fan, even some repukes are gonna
be mad as hell.All the dems have to do then is sit back and let the law and human nature take it's course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #25
60. That's my gut feeling
I think it will take action by those from his own party to take him down. So far they all seem to have a very high tolerance for the putrid stench of the Decider's policies. I cling to the belief that even they have their limits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
26. He's not doing himself any favors now, that's for sure
When my local newspaper is printing bush bashing toons, you know his stance in the eyes of Americans has changed.

I share your feelings on this. It's like watching a horrific accident taking place before your eyes that just keeps getting worse. Then there's the fact that most Americans don't yet have a real clue the depth of his deceptions, but without the buffer of Congress he's been used to protecting him, they could damn well find out soon. Anything is possible after that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
28. I have had thoughts of him being removed from the White House
on a guerney. Since his face is not covered, he's alive. However, these thoughts have been really persistent for almost a year now. I think he's going to suffer a major mental breakdown and they will have to remove him to a hospital for his own safety.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sadie5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. You are right about Bush
I think he will have to be taken out kicking and screaming, but he will resign after all of the hearings start. He will use the worn excuse of needing more time with the twins and Laura. The Bush family will leave the WH in disgrace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. H.W. bush knows it is coming
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #28
65. That would be worth living to see.
As I said upthread, in 2000 astrologists, and I think some psychics, predicted he would not finish out his presidency.

Will be an interesting show.

I really would like to see your ending. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 04:02 AM
Response to Reply #28
78. You must be thinking of
911 when he scampered off to who knows where. It is pretty evident that he is a master at hiding out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
34. Like I said this is something that I have felt
for a long time. I even knew when Bush was first "elected" that we were in for a long haul. I remember Poppy and I sure as hell knew his son was going to do the same, if not, worse shit that he did.

Blue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
36. You think that's an odd thought...listen to mine
I think the republicans are going to end up pushing him out because they are the ones with the most to lose in 2008. Iraq is going to become more and more of a nightmare that can't be hidden behind cute phrases, the deaths and maiming of our troops is going to spiral up, other M.E. countries are going to get more directly involved and of course we have Condi and Bush to deal with it, which of course means its going to get putrid, godawful, horrid bad.

So, don't feel alone. I think you are right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #36
79. My humble prayer
Bring them Home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Brad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
38. If Cheney or Gonzales resigns -- it's on
My gut tells me that one of these two leaving will be the catalyst that gets the impeachment dominoes falling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. Fitz legal actions could be the impetus for either or both departing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
40. the wheels are coming off the wagon and lets hope it is lil g'orges wagon
not ours, but yes I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
41. It's all part of some sort of cosmic catalystic change...
Yes something big is going to happen.

I personally hope that Bush gets held accountable for the shit that he has done. We have had enough of him and quite frankly it's not just liberals that are sick of him either. I have heard Republicans here in Grand Rapids saying that he's a crook. So if conservatives here in my town are saying that, then of course the Doofus in Chief is in alot of trouble.

Oh please come Jan. 4th, I want Pelosi and the Dems now!!!

Blue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
43. Do your gut feelings have a history of panning out?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. Sometimes, not always...
That's why I said I could be right, but I also could be wrong. Let's hope it's the former.

Psychic abilities do tend to run in my family. My mom is very much a psychic. She has her thoughts on what will happen to Bush that I can't mention on DU but I can tell you it doesn't involve impeachment. I on the other have strong feeling of legal actions being held against him and his administrations. I felt that way before and during the 2004 elections. And now that certain scandals have turned up against the administration, the fact that Iraq is now in a civil war and we are pretty much trapped there, and more detainee abuses popping up are proving to me that I am thinking on the right track.

I wouldn't be surprised if more members of his Cabinet start retiring. Maybe Condi?

Blue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #45
63. Well, I hope you're right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 04:07 AM
Response to Reply #63
80. V. nice logo! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
left is right Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
46. I really don't think he will resign or be impeached.
But I don't believe he will fulfill his term in office. I think the corporatists that make up the shadow government will arrange a little loan gunman reception for him. Some aging dirty hippie with 3 names will be blamed. Impeachment will take them out of power for at least 10-12 years, but assassination will make a hero our of him and keep them in power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. That is pretty much how my mom feels as well n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 04:09 AM
Response to Reply #49
81. If you are dealing with
the top gang, nothing is impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
47. Remember 20 Oct 1973?
Edited on Mon Dec-18-06 11:10 PM by longship
That's the day when the entire United States of America went through a state change on impeaching Richard M. Nixon.

That's what it took to get the ball started in 1973.

Here are John Chancellor's exact words as he reported this in an NBC Special Report:
JOHN CHANCELLOR, NBC News: Good evening. The country tonight is in the midst of what may be the most serious Constitutional crisis in its history. The President has fired the special Watergate prosecutor, Archibald Cox. Because of the President's action, the attorney general has resigned. Elliott Richardson has quit, saying he cannot carry out Mr. Nixon's instructions. Richardson's deputy, William Ruckelshaus, has been fired.

Ruckelshaus refused, in a moment of Constitutional drama, to obey a presidential order to fire the special Watergate prosecutor. And half an hour after the special Watergate prosecutor had been fired, agents of the FBI, acting at the direction of the White House, sealed off the offices of the special prosecutor, the offices of the attorney general and the offices of the deputy attorney general.

All of this adds up to a totally unprecedented situation, a grave and profound crisis in which the President has set himself against his own attorney general and the Department of Justice.

Nothing like this has ever happened before.

More than 50,000 telegrams poured in on Capitol Hill today, so many, Western Union was swamped. Most of them demanded impeaching Mr. Nixon.

...

In my career as a correspondent, I never thought I'd be reporting these things.


And so it went. Nine days later, the Time Magazine cover featured, "The Push to Impeach". A little over nine months later, Nixon was gone.

If you are right, and Bush gets impeached, I shudder to consider what kind of constitutional crisis it will take to move the current brain-dead electorate to send 50,000 telegrams to Congress in one evening. I suspect that such transgressions have already occurred and that it may only require their revelation to trigger the people to turn the corner. But I am very worried that it might take a particularly grievious new transgression to accomplish it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
left is right Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. About this telegram thing
Edited on Mon Dec-18-06 11:14 PM by left is right
Do you think that they must all come in the same time frame or can we start now and have them accumulate?

Edited to add:
If you all feel that it would be beneficial for them to all arrive during the same time frame, will one of you please let me know when I should send mine?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. That's a tough question.
I suspect the former. 50,000 telegrams within a period of time are nothing compared to 50,000 in one night, followed by millions more in subsequent nights. That's what happened at the end of 1973.

This is what is important. Impeachment will never happen until this kind of support from the people happens. The Nixon impeachment process is the exemplar of how to do this because it is the only case where impeachment worked. This, in spite of the fact that Nixon was never actually impeached. He didn't have to be because the investigations were done with great deference to following a deliberative process and doing it right. Comparing Nixon to Clinton is like comparing it to a Looney Toons version of impeachment.

This is precisely why I worry that those trumpeting impeachment now haven't really studied this thing very carefully. It's why I think a Bush impeachment will not likely happen. It's why I think if it does happen, it may not work, or if it works, it'll be because we're in very, very deep shit.

One cannot mindlessly rip impeachment out of its historic context by claiming all sorts of ridiculous things like, "it's congress's constitutional obligation to impeach." History and the people of the United States have a somewhat different view of it. What we saw in 1998 was a congress who thought that they had a constitutional duty. We all know how that ended.

People need to think about these things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 03:27 AM
Response to Reply #53
74. Impeachemt is both a political act
and an organic act

The reason why many are going IMPEACH NOW is becuse they know what has been done

Yet it will not happen umtil the congress officially knows what has gone down

I also suspect that after the crap is uncovered it will be hard to avoid it, mostly because we will demand it.

I asked on the 12th of last month that Congress do its job, investigate and impeach if need be... even sent a copy of the US contituion to both my congress critter and Pelosi, but I fully understand WHY it is "off the table" right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 03:48 AM
Response to Reply #74
75. Good show, Nadin
That's what we all have to do. But our efforts are just a trickle. We really have to get things rolling if impeachment is to be back on the table. I like John Dean's latest article which argues going after the ChimpCo underlings. That's doable and just might bring down the entire mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Homer Wells Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
50. Nancy Pelosi and the rest of the Dems are doing the wise thing
Going in to power with no plan for impeachment.

After the new Congress goes into session next month, the investigations will commence, and so much will come out that both the Dems and the moderate Republiks will begin calling for Impeachment proceedings. Perhaps even the more radical Neocons will join the fray, to try to distance themselves with the criminal acts, mostly out of a sense of self-preservation.

If this occurs, it will be difficult to make the charge "tit-for-tat" stick to the Dems come 2008.
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-18-06 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
51. I think the Clinton impeachment has given Bush a free pass to do anything
It's almost as if the Democrats think that it's unconstitutional to impeach two presidents in a row. Clinton's impeachment was a travesty, but now that an impeachment is truly deserved, and the members of Congress are too afraid to bring up the subject. They're more concerned about their political power.

Note - This could change if investigations show enough of Bush's crimes that the public starts demanding it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
57. Your mom is wrong
two presidents have been impeached, Harry Harrison and Clinton. NONE have been convicted

But I am just quibling here with facts

As to your feelings, if the investigations go forth, it is going to be demanded
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #57
61. Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton
There is no President Harry Harrison. He wasn't a bad science fiction author, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #61
71. thanks for the corection
and I know why I was thinking of Harry Harrison, I gave a kid "we raised" some sci fi books today, and I considered some of his
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
83. You know I usually don't speal much of this
but I have the distinct feeling since 2001, before 9.11 that der chimperor is not finishing his term.

There are variant ways for him to leave the WH, but in the end he does not finish it. Been having recurring dreams\ nightmares since 2001 about this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 05:49 AM
Response to Reply #83
87. Every Pres, except Reagon, that was elected in a year
ending in 00 has died in office. Yeah, busholini was not elected but selected. We shall see if we are still alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #83
96. You and me both, Nadin...
Edited on Tue Dec-19-06 04:15 PM by Blue_In_AK
see my post below.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
89. The fact we can't even get all democrats to impeach the most
impeachable president in the history of the United States makes me wonder if it can ever happen. Not enough politicians love this country enough to push proceedings. I'm still trying to find out why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
92. I have a deep, gut feeling that he won't.
though impeachment is more of a possibility than his actually being convicted and removed from office by the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
93. Feelings, wo-o-o feelings,
Wo-o-o, feelings again in my arms.
Feelings...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nightjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
94. I talked with my congressman this morning
he said as soon as the new year starts they will get rid of Diebold and investigate EVERYTHING.

And than he smiled the BIGGEST SMILE!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
95. I have thought for six years that he wouldn't make it through
Edited on Tue Dec-19-06 04:14 PM by Blue_In_AK
two terms, although my sense was that he'd be out sometime in 2006. I guess I was wrong on that, but maybe next year. I can't stand the bastard - he's GOT TO GO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC