Sometimes, the unasked questions are the most important ones. Like the one in the headline to this post.
Continuing with analysis from the Texas House Law Enforcement Committee interim report (pdf), another "charge" to the committee was to monitor the implementation of HB 164, Texas anti-meth law passed in 2005 that authorized the state to take custody of children seized near meth labs and required consumers to show ID and sign for pseudoephedrine products (like cold tablets) that are used to make homemade meth.
I was disappointed the committee failed to focus at all in its report on the most important aspect of this bill: What happened to the children seized as a result of this new law? Were they later returned to their parents? Did they enter the foster care system? Since HB 164 provided no new or specialized resources for these chidren, do we know whether they received counseling and support needed by a child traumatized by removal from their family? None of these questions are discussed in the report - we don't even know how many children were seized under the new law - 10, 50, 100, 500, quien sabe?
Did anybody see 60 Minutes'
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/12/14/60minutes/main2269159.shtml">segment on foster children who were taken away from their parents last night? Here's the
http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/i_video/main500251.shtml?id=2274699n">video. What happens psychologically to children under such circumstances really can't be understood
http://gritsforbreakfast.blogspot.com/2005/07/go-kids.html">unless you've witnessed it. These kids are psychically brutalized then basically thrown away. And the Law Enforcement Committee's report reflects that - nobody even looked to see what happened to them.
more:
http://gritsforbreakfast.blogspot.com/2006/12/what-happened-to-texas-kids-seized.html I'll never believe the "for the children" meme is more than an attack on the Bill of Rights until it is for ALL the children.