Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Pimp for the Bush Occupations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 09:40 AM
Original message
New Pimp for the Bush Occupations
December 19, 2006


"Failure in Iraq at this juncture would be a calamity that would haunt our nation, impair our credibility, and endanger Americans for decades to come." --Secretary of Defense Robert Gates at swearing-in


Out with the old Defense chief, in with the new, and, everything is as it was. At least the posturing and rhetoric remains the same. Watching Rumsfeld exit his job with pageantry usually reserved for victors and conquering heroes, it would serve this White House-in-denial if we somehow forgot that neither historic deployment of our military forces, in Afghanistan or Iraq, managed to come anywhere close to accomplishing any of the goals the Bush regime claimed would make our nation more secure in the wake of the 9-11 attacks.

Yet, there he was, standing beside the President and Vice-President of the United States in front of an honors ceremony -- reveling in Bush's praise for "racing down smoke-filled hallways to the crash site, so he could help rescue workers pull the victims from the rubble" on 9-11 -- instead of before a tribunal, being made to account for the hundreds of thousands of innocents caught in the way of his "shock and awe" campaigns, and to account for those held captive and tortured in the new gulags of his dual occupations.

"Under Secretary Rumsfeld's leadership," Bush proclaimed, "U.S. and coalition forces launched one of the most innovative military campaigns in the history of modern warfare, sending Special Operations forces into Afghanistan . . . On his watch," Bush said, "the United States military helped the Iraqi people establish a constitutional democracy in the heart of the Middle East, a watershed event in the story of freedom."

There was nothing "innovative" at all about charging into Afghanistan -- "to link up with anti-Taliban fighters, to ride with them on horseback," as Bush bragged; cornering bin Laden at Tora Bora, and then cutting-and running from that hunt to divert the bulk of our nation's defenses to Iraq, to "draw a line in the sand," as the terrorists escaped into the mountains of Afghanistan. There has been nothing "innovative" about the five years of freedom the terror suspects have been gifted with by that diversion in Iraq. In fact, there is nothing innovative at all about invading and occupying Afghanistan or Iraq, overthrowing their governments, and installing weak and compliant replacements. Both Britain and the former Soviet Union eventually abandoned their attempts to militarily dominate these nations in the past, victim to their own fatal overreaches.

There has been no "democracy" established under the respective rule of the 'mayors' of Kabul and Baghdad, Karsai and Maliki. The 'elections', held under the occupation of the invading forces, have done nothing to enable those who braved the U.S. generated violence and voted to effect any of the security, or basic tenets of citizenship, which should be assumed under a true democratic government. More often, these very voters have, themselves, come under attack from the forces of the government they've voted into power. Certainly, those communities whose residents have opposed the new regimes, have been the targets of reprisals and suppression from government forces, aided by the U.S..

Yet, the Bush regime would have us carry forward with the same false bravado of achievement they wave around behind the sacrifices of our soldiers, which has been repeated, over and over by the Bush regime, in the face of half a decade of bloody failure in the Middle East. Bush practically gushed with glee over the new, incoming manager of his dirty wars. "This has got to be an exciting time for Bob Gates," Bush said, before the new Defense chief was sworn in. "I can't tell you what an honor it is to be the Commander-in-Chief of unbelievably fine people. And I suspect he will share that same sense of enthusiasm as the Secretary of the Defense," he said.

Gates accepted the praise with the same qualifying language he used in front of the Senate committee, indicating his purpose in taking the job was less a enthusiasm than it was an assignment. "I return to public service in the hope that I can make a difference," Gates said after taking the oath.There has to be little comfort for Gates in his clean-up role; taking a hand-up from Bush to stand atop the rubble and humanity Bush and Rumsfeld have piled up since 2001. But, he did his best to blend into the mirage Bush has created to mask the failures in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"All of us want to find a way to bring America's sons and daughters home again," Gates told those gathered. "But, as the President has made clear, we simply cannot afford to fail in the Middle East. Failure in Iraq at this juncture would be a calamity that would haunt our nation, impair our credibility, and endanger Americans for decades to come."

If we "simply can't afford to fail," at the risk of a "calamity," then the worst is already upon us. Iraq and Afghanistan are utter failures which have provided resounding demonstrations of the limits of our overwhelming military forces in effecting the creation of democracies; "constitutional" or otherwise. If Gates is set to angle our over-extended forces to avoid losing in Iraq or Afghanistan, he'll find there's little that our military can do at this point to repair the damage and mistrust Bush and his predecessor's arrogant militarism has fostered, generated, and perpetuated among the residents of these occupied nations.

The only way anything will be 'won' in these countries is through an effort to actually engage the "hearts and minds" which were crushed under Bush's heavy-hand. Gates will learn -- voluntarily or not -- that, the more he pursues his military mission, the further away the reconciliation he claims to desire will become. If he intends to succeed in his new job, where Rumsfeld failed miserably, Gates will need to do more than just reorganize the pawns in Bush's cynical game. He'll have to argue for a rare rationality to whatever mission from Bush he's expected to hoist onto our soldiers' backs, and not merely settle for coronations and plaudits from his bankrupt commander.


http://journals.democraticunderground.com/bigtree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. No surprise there....
Edited on Tue Dec-19-06 09:43 AM by marmar
Surely no one thought Bush was going to select a Defense Secretary who challenged him, right? :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I actually believe this is lip service for Bush, but not the underlying strategy for
those really in charge now. They will be mindful of his fragile ego, though.

House of Saud called in House of Bush some weeks ago (and also called in Cheney), and shortly after Rumsfeld was given the shove. House of Saud doesn't give a crap about Bushboy's ego and want Iraq situation controlled and US to not be seen as occupier so the entire region doesn't turm into Civil War. They want troops redeployed, but not too far, just in case the hostilities turn towards them.

That's my read. I just don't believe the Saudis called on Bush1 and Cheney for courtesy visits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. it may be lip service, but every expression like this means more military muckraking ahead
and more lives lost and maimed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Undoubtedly, that is true, too. But, though they will try and save Bushboy's face,
Edited on Tue Dec-19-06 05:30 PM by blm
and mime the words he wants to hear, I don't believe for a second he's running the show at this point. Bushboy caused too much heat on ALL of the big players.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I think you're right on about the 'players' wanting to end the expensive game
I can't believe there isn't something else they'd like to spend $8 billion dollars on a month other than Iraq. But, it's the continuing rhetoric about something in Iraq which can be won, or lost at some hyped-up peril which will keep soldiers bogged down there conducting raids and policing the Iraqi neighborhoods along with their militia-compromised Iraqi counterparts. Those are the threads Bush uses to justify keeping us there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. They still need their 'image' to preserve the Bush name. As IF anything can make W seem
Edited on Tue Dec-19-06 05:48 PM by blm
statesmanlike at this point. But they'll sacfrifice more lives if they can spin it into some imagery that makes Bushboy seem even slightly competent. No doubt the mediawhores will help, as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yep...
"We simply cannot afford to lose", he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. that's why Bush's entire foreign policy is bankrupt
Gates is just another mortgage on his presidency
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. we are screwn for sure if something doesn't happen soon
Edited on Tue Dec-19-06 09:58 AM by madokie
january 20th can't come quick enough

to add: thanks and you are so right on, as always
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. thank you, madokie
it should be a gripping year
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. Very well written & dead-on accurate
K & R.
:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. thanks, JeffR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. Let me translate what Mr. Gates was really trying to say.
"Failure in Iraq at this juncture would be a calamity that would haunt our Republican Party, impair our credibility, and endanger Republican political candidates for decades to come."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. You Speak Republic-ese?
I didn't know that. Thanks for that translation! That's repulic-ese, right? Or is "lying idiot-ese?"
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. It's capitalist pig latin. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
10. Mr. Gates was one of the UNANIMOUS signers of the Iraq Study Group report.
Was he lying then, or now? Good way to start out mr. gates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. he's already settling in to the job
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
11. There's never been an exit plan because nobody's ever
planned on exiting.

It was neither an error in judgment, nor a inadequate strategy.

Democracy is the ultimate enemy of fascism. The very thought that the indigenous brown people of Iraq would be able to control their own natural resources scares the hell out of Rumsfeld and Cheney.

They went over there to take it all for themselves and their partners in crime. Rumsfeld, Cheney, et al are parasites; none of them are Americans. And they're not about to give it all up just because the Dems have subpoena power and a new defense secretary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-20-06 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #11
20. or, just because the majority of Americans are demanding they exit
there are levers if our party is willing to use them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
18. Not surprised and add me to the citizens that remember BFEE history.
This thread was started two days after the mid-terms, one day after the "resignation" of Mr. Rumsfeld, war criminal, profiteer, revolutionary and he also has a history of aiding, arming and supporting enemies-which is treason.

Mr. Gates also has a history. Many of the issues and players raised in your thread were present in this one too, bigtree, there's a lot of US not surprised.

The reality is already far worse than what the fresh-eyed "confirmed" SecDef voiced.

"Gates is Poppy's guy...datadump"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x2665635
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC