Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stop the presses! The First Lady is a Private Citizen???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 02:34 PM
Original message
Stop the presses! The First Lady is a Private Citizen???
MSNBC is on in the other room and I just overheard that the reason the WH didn't report the First Lady's cancer is because "she's a private citizen". WTF???

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. We didn't elect her did we?
:shrug:

Last time I checked the only names on the ballot in '04 were the electors/Kerry/Edwards/Bush/Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Ok. We didn't elect Rice, Rumsfeld, et al either
Are they private citizens, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Yes, but they are Constitutional Officers...
which the first lady is not. She doesn't have anymore power than to figure out when the Christmas lights will be lit or what kind of food to serve at a function.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Hmmm...going to have to think about this
It seems to me that her position carries quite a bit of weight and responsibility. (Pissing off a foreign leader or his/her spouse comes to mind, for one. LOL!) Not to mention that she regularly goes out publicly speaking on behalf of the President.

I'll concede that her medical 'conditions' could be held private to her discretion. But, to respond that it was 'because she is a private citizen'...just doesn't sit right with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. There's elected office and appointed office
and both confer salaries. The first lady has no office nor salary, so she qualifies as a private citizen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Except she has a full complement of paid staff
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. They're actually her husband's staff
but she is expected to supervise them for things like correspondence, protocol, menus, plus all the upkeep on the White House.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. Yes, you did elect her. And the twins, and the dogs. And Lynne Cheney, etc. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. that's an interesting question. Is she or isn't she?
I'm not sure. She wasn't elected and she's just married to the president, so maybe she is. But on the other hand she certainly has a platform and her activities are reported, so the question is, if she is a private citizen why do they report on what the "First Lady" does or says?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. She also receives all of the taxpaid benefits of a public official
including a high level of security. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 02:37 PM
Original message
"Private citizen" as in "not a public official"
Sure, she's a public persona, but so is Larry the Cable Guy. And as far as I know Larry hasn't killed anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well whether she is or isn't may be debateable
But in my opinion, her medical condition is none of our business. And most likely, if any president, Democrat or republic was sick, it would be kept as quiet as possible as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. I don't disagree on the 'none of our business'
I just take issue that it's the WH response. They could have said it was a private matter, personal matter, or go Cheney yourself. It seems putting her in a category of "Private Citizen" is quite a reach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Republican illness would be kept quiet.
Republican illness would be kept quiet, as in when Reagan
was essentially completely disabled by Alzheimers, or when
Strom Thurmond was reduced to little more than being the
official vegetable of the United States Senate.

I doubt the same courtesy would be afforded a Democratic
illness; we've come a long way since FDR and his polio
paralysis.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kikosexy2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. She's just a citizen...
showing off her privates...oops, that would be Britney Spears..har, har...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Pickles had great opportunity to do something for the Public Good--yet
she tried to keep it under raps.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Yes, she proved she was no Betty Ford
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Isn't she?
I don't believe the public is entitled to personal knowledge of her medical condition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. Maybe we're not 'entitled'...
but she could have used it to raise public awareness of skin cancers. I had a quarter-sized squamous cell malignancy carved out of my hand in October...and was damned relieved when the pathology report came back. I had topical-chemo and at this point, it's about a dime-sized bit of scar tissue. If my father not been plagued with skin cancers, I might not be as informed as I am about such things. So Laura missed the boat again as far as I'm concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Yes, she could have.
I don't think that was the point.

My mother had skin cancer too. She's had more than one melanoma removed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Oh. I guess the point really was
is she a "private citizen". In my very humble opinion, public or private, she's an opportunistic hick who married up- (she thinks) and lives on the public dole. I don't give a rat's patootie about her health or her privacy one way or another. I have as much concern for Dear Laura & Dear Leader as they have for the 'little people' who pay their freight day in and day out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. Shes not a private citizen as long as our tax dollars are paying her food bill n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
34. by that standard I am a public figure too
and I don't think I am. While it may have been beneficial from a public health perspective for her to come forward, I have no problem at all with the WH not doing so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hmm, let's see...
We fund her "Staff"
We put a roof over her head
She travels where ever she wants at public expense
She enjoys 24/7 Secret Service protection

Nope. She's just one of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. My thoughts exactly
The Office of the Frist Lady at the White House is not funded privately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retrograde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
17. She is when it's convenient
But when the puppetmasters think she can bring public sympathy or support to a cause, she's right out there as the edumacation first lady, promoting her pet projects and deflecting flack from whatever Bush is doing at the moment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenbriar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
31. BINGO
if they didn't think it woudl soften their image, they would not have "leaked" this info
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
20. hmmmm......and all the nasty reporting on Hillary????
if you cant take it, dont dish it up! Laura, your minions were dumping on Hillary big time and now, you dont want things discussed? Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
22. I think the phrasing was..."because it is a private matter."
I caught it on MSNBC this morning. Of course that was this morning, and you know how that goes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
25. If she is, then why are we paying for her staff and SS protection? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
26. She's also not so private when her pot shots at the "media" & other targets get covered as though
they were sent here from the Great Beyond. If she's so private, why do we have to hear her incessant commentary on everything which displeases her?

I don't think her dressing downs have changed the mind of one living person concerning her deluded, backward, self-obsessed giant child husband.




What better place for a little romance than a Pope's funeral?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Good lord,
I never saw that picture...eck....what the hell's the matter with them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. Ugh! That's as creepy as catching your parents having sex. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
28. If she's just a private citizen, then stop putting her out front and center
to pull your cojones out of the fire. Stop sending her to campaign for those politicians who don't want to be seen with Bush because of his low approval ratings. Stop letting her blame the media for the failure of this administrations war.

She may not have been elected, but her private life sure isn't private. Just like the status of Hillary's marriage was never private.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
33. The "job" of first lady exists from 18th century custom
In fact, technically, a president can have someone else do it - widowed or single presidents did- Buchanan appointed his niece, and Jefferson appointed Dolly Madison. A couple of President's wives were ill and someone else stepped in.

Modern times have not caught up with the concept that a man is no longer always required to, in high social circles, have a "lady of the house."

What would we do if we had

1 - a woman president with a husband?
2 - a single president?
3 - a president, God forbid, whose wife left him while he was in the WH? Or whose husband left her?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
35. Then let us dispense with the "first lady" crap, shall we? Oh, and how about
NEVER REPORTING ON HER??

And then there's the FREE TRIPS OVERSEAS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC