WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 01:33 PM
Original message |
Results of Daily Kos January '08 Straw Poll (11,117 respondents) |
|
Feingold 30% (19% in November) Clark 22% (26% in November) Warner 12% (14% in November) Edwards 8% (12% in November) No Clue 6% Other 6% H. Clinton 3% (6% in November) Kerry 3% (2% in November) Richardson 3% (5% in November) Bayh 1% Biden 1%
www.dailykos.com
|
Stephanie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 01:34 PM
Response to Original message |
helderheid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. that was my question too |
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
At that point Kos was only polling people who are assumed to be running, rather than those who we wish were running.
|
Renew Deal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 01:37 PM
Response to Original message |
|
What's with Fiengolds takeoff?
|
Dawgs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Shit!!! Imagine Feingold/Clark!!! |
|
Edited on Wed Feb-01-06 01:45 PM by Dawgs
They sure would make a great team.
Feingold -------- Pros: Great speaker/debater; speaks plainly. Intelligent. Great leader. Young, but not too young (not bad looking). Cons: Jewish Senator.
Clark ----- Pros: Military credentials that are second to no one. Good looking. Not a congressperson. Great representative. Good speaker. Cons: Former Republican. Lacks political experience.
|
11cents
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Clark is not a former Republican! |
|
Yeesh. Haven't we been through this? Although I wouldn't consider it a "con" if he were. An actual former Republican putting forth the kind of liberal program Clark is advocating would be a real problem for the GOP.
I think Feingold's major "con," besides being a senator, is ridiculous but real -- the fact that he's single. Being divorced is no longer an issue, but people seem to like a little family-values tableau in the WH.
|
Dawgs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
maybe not a former Republican, but he did vote for Nixon and Reagan(1980).
My bad!!!
|
Coexist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. I like Feingold/Clark very much |
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
10. Clark has political experience...... |
|
negotiating with 19 countries' Top leaders to get them all on the same page is nothing but "political".....
and running for President in 2004 is also a political chore. Considering that Wes wasn't covered by the media after Iowa's results....he still was the only candidate to win a state that wasn't his Home/birth state except for John Kerry. Considering his 4 months run, he did damn well in the political arena!
Beyond that experience, I'd rather he not have too much political experience! Selling your soul to the highest bidder and droning on and on is the only advantage some of the pols have over non pols.
Ending Government Corruption will be accomplished by an outsider much more affectively!
Bush is a politician.....and I'm not impressed! :hi:
|
Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
13. I think the last thing that people want in 2008 is a career politician. |
|
Now we can discuss the merits of such a sentiment, but I don't think after all of these scandals and all of this mismanagement by our "professional" politicians that voters are going to be looking for a typical politician. Someone like a Warner or a Clark with relatively little political experience or a complete maverick like Feingold.
|
mattclearing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message |
7. That looks about right to me. |
|
I'd but Edwards above Warner, but that's my only real qualm.
|
WildEyedLiberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 02:09 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Straw polls matter in which universe? |
|
These results are no surprise coming from Daily Kos. Saying that Feingold and Clark are the DailyKos darlings is like calling Bush corrupt - it's been obvious for some time now.
|
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
14. it's a poll just like we have on DU except with more people |
|
of course its unscientific, but so what. I think it gives a glimpse of where some of the most active of activist Democrats are at this point. If it were a mainstream Gallup poll (or whatever) Hillary would be leading.
|
Radical Activist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 06:02 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Notice how corporate media polls never include Feingold. |
|
They don't want us to consider an anti-war liberal as a viable option.
|
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 10:13 PM
Response to Original message |
15. 'Am guessing that many folks on liberal blogs are not going to |
|
vote for Senator Clinton in their respective primaries, and this may account for her poor finish in this poll, but even still, it's a poor showing and it may mean that the nomination is not hers. The left-of-center voters love primaries and they show up in large numbers in places like Iowa.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:22 AM
Response to Original message |