Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dept Of Homeland Security FORCED To Admit They VIOLATED PRIVACY LAW

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-22-06 09:40 AM
Original message
Dept Of Homeland Security FORCED To Admit They VIOLATED PRIVACY LAW
Report Says TSA Violated Privacy Law
Passengers Weren't Told That Brokers Provided Data to Screening Program in '04

By Ellen Nakashima and Del Quentin Wilber
Washington Post Staff Writers
Friday, December 22, 2006; Page A07

Secure Flight, the U.S. government's stalled program to screen domestic air passengers against terrorism watch lists, violated federal law during a crucial test phase, according to a report to be issued today by the Homeland Security Department's privacy office.

The agency found that by gathering passenger data from commercial brokers in 2004 without notifying the passengers, the program violated a 1974 Privacy Act requirement that the public be made aware of any changes in a federal program that affects the privacy of U.S. citizens. "As ultimately implemented, the commercial data test conducted in connection with the Secure Flight program testing did not match (the Transportation Security Administration's) public announcements," the report states.

The finding marks the first time that the Homeland Security Department has acknowledged that the problem-plagued Secure Flight program has violated the law. It comes at a time when a separate program to screen international passengers is under attack for officials' failure to disclose until recently that they were creating passenger profiles that would be stored for 40 years.

The report on Secure Flight says that "the disparity between what TSA proposed to do and what it actually did in the testing program resulted in significant privacy concerns being raised. . . . Privacy missteps such as these undercut an agency's effort to implement a program effectively, even one that promises to improve security."

more at:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/21/AR2006122101621.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-22-06 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Catch this little nugget as well, in today's Washington Post:
It seems to be critically important for the paranoid occupant of the White House to identify and track his political opponents.

From today's Washington Post: Report Says TSA Violated Privacy Law.

Passengers Weren't Told That Brokers Provided Data to Screening Program in '04


In 2004, the TSA published a Federal Register notice on a data-test phase of the program, saying that "strict firewalls" would prevent any commercial data from mixing with government data. However, this was based on the notion that the Secure Flight contractor, EagleForce Associates Inc. of McLean, would ensure that no commercial data were used, the report said.

But by the time the EagleForce contract was finalized, "it was clear that TSA would receive commercial data," the report says. If, for instance, TSA data for an individual passenger lacked an address or date of birth, EagleForce would obtain the missing information from commercial data brokers.

"The fact that EagleForce had access to the commercial data did not create a firewall," the report says, because under the Privacy Act, in effect, "EagleForce stands in the shoes of TSA."

Moreover, commercial databases provided Eagle Force with data for some individuals who were not air passengers. These people were never notified -- a violation of the privacy act, the report says.



Ms. Pelosi, clean off a place on this table for impeachment proceedings.




(emphasis mine)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-22-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Methinks the DHS doesn't give a rat's ass what laws they violate in keeping us safe from
terra. :7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WestMichRad Donating Member (92 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-22-06 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oops! Yeah, we were breaking the law...
...but we were doing it for your safety, so please forgive us!

(and we'll keep doing it, but find better ways to keep it quiet, so...)

There's nothing to see here folks, but how about that American Idol/Survivor winner, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Higans Donating Member (819 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-22-06 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. who didn't see this coming?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jose Diablo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-23-06 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bu$h says....heckofajob Chertoff
The part of eliminating individual freedom here is coming along nicely as we have determined the reason 9-11 happened is our society has too much freedom, so to fight the bad guys we must expand the police state to resemble something more like the East German STASI, yes, that's the ticket and of course those pesky representatives in Congress, well with the information your TSA can give Rove and me, I'll have them all by the short hairs.

Bu$h and his cohorts need to be impeached, convicted and incarcerated, I don't give one good god damn about partisanship in the political process, if you come across a criminal, you don't negotiate, you put them away. Any negotiating with a criminal will only encourage them to try for more. Put the bastards in jail, it's the only way to regain our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC