Congress, the Voters & a Peace Plan
By Brent Budowsky
December 23, 2006
Editor's Note: When American voters overturned the Republican majorities in the House and Senate on Nov. 7, one of the key messages was pretty clear -- the people wanted the war in Iraq wound down and the 140,000 American occupation troops brought home.A month later, the voters' consensus was largely reflected in the recommendations of the bipartisan Iraq Study Group, headed by former Secretary of State James Baker and former Rep. Lee Hamilton. The group proposed a gradual withdrawal of U.S. forces, direct talks with Iran and Syria, and a serious bid to settle the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Now, more than two weeks later,
President George W. Bush has mostly ignored the voters' message, spurned the advice of the Iraq Study Group and appears headed toward an escalation -- or "surge" -- in U.S. troop levels in Iraq. In this guest essay, political analyst Brent Budowsky says Bush's apparent course has laid down a challenge to Democrats and Republicans who want peace:
...........
How many candidates in either political party promised this on election day: "If you vote for me I will support escalating the war in Iraq.
I will support overruling the strong majority of our commanders who oppose such an escalation, I will oppose any serious regional diplomacy, I will oppose any significant search for broader Middle East peace, I will support using our troops to do the job of the Iraqi police, intervening to support sides in an Iraqi civil war, and I will show contempt for all Republicans and Democrats on Baker Hamilton?The American people have just voted for a whole new and better way.
The American people are right, and await a leader with the courage to lead.MUCH more at:
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2006/122306a.html