Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge issues 19-year sentence for carrying bullets

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-23-06 06:03 PM
Original message
Judge issues 19-year sentence for carrying bullets
Judge issues 19-year sentence for carrying bullets

A Wichita man prosecutors and police call a career burglar will spend more than 19 years in federal prison for carrying six bullets.

...
Baker had six previous convictions for breaking into businesses.

Wichita police Capt. Darrell Haynes said Baker was suspected in 56 burglaries in the past year.

"Our department had grown so frustrated in trying to capture Mr. Baker that we had begun to form a task force to focus solely on him," Haynes said.

A jury convicted Baker in August of possessing ammunition, a federal crime for a felon. Police said the bullets had been stolen.

http://www.kansas.com/mld/kansas/news/16297041.htm

There's more than one way to skin a cat as they say :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-23-06 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Are bullets serialized???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. No...
but the box will generally have a lot number that may allow you to find out where they came from.

I'm not sure how they knew they were stolen, but that was irrelevant to the conviction. For a convicted felon to even touch a single round of ammunition is a major Federal felony, and he had six rounds in his possession.

Not sure why he had only six, though, unless (1) he either had a revolver or something in his possession and ditched it, but forgot to ditch his spare ammo, or (2) he stole the ammo from a house but didn't have time to steal the gun (maybe the gun was in a safe or something).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-23-06 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. as an X-parole officer all i can say is some of those people need to be put away, they only get wors...
there was the next to definite there was a gun for those bullets.. this guy was totally out of control and needed to be placed under control..

before anyone criticizes the sentence.. you need to consider he may live next door to you.. and you wife and kids.. with a gun and bullets and hopped up on meth with a hard on for your wife or your child.. and will do anything for a fix. some people do not respond to counceling... they are lost souls, tragic but real when they live next door.. if not to you .. to someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Just a little note with my hunting permit
We get one every year for Xmas. There was a note attached warning anyone who is a Felon or had any conviction even if a juvenile not to sign the permit an return it or else.

I read it as: One twitch and we will take your guns away forever.

First year it's happened.

The US Attorney here has been going after people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Once again, I got lost.
Where in the article does it say he is a meth addict? Missed that. And is there any evidence he ever stole from or attacked a next door neighbor? Though bad enough, businesses aren't what we think of when we think of next door neighbors. And if he was sentenced in part based on the "suspected 56 burglaries" that should be overturned under Blakely, which found a judge cannot sentence based on crimes not proven before a jury.

If there is a law and bullet possession gets someone 16 years, then that's the law, but if it was assumed he had a gun when he never did, then that's injustice.

Maybe a 16-year sentence is just, and maybe he really was dangerous, but there are a lot of assumptions in this case that make it questionable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. 6 previous convictions.
No tears for this guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC