Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Potty parity' is revisited as House gets its first female speaker

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 02:21 PM
Original message
'Potty parity' is revisited as House gets its first female speaker
The closest restroom to the U.S. House of Representatives chamber for female members is off the Lindy Claiborne Boggs Congressional Women's Reading Room located in the Capitol's Statuary Hall. Male representatives merely have to walk a few steps off the chamber floor to find a restroom.



I remember when I enlisted into the Army back in the late 70's, and was surprised at the lack of female restrooms at certain facilities.

http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/16292400.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. I can't wait to hear the Wingnut screeching about this!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. ROFL!!
:rofl:

they are already pissed off about her "victory celebration"

http://wizbangblog.com/2006/12/23/all-hail-queen-nancy.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. They should have potties in the chambers off to the sides...
someone can give up an office for that...and it should be unisexed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. We can convert Tom DeLay's old office to a couple of johns
It would be used for about the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why do the Repukes need a restroom?
They already piss on the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vanje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Surely there are more urgent issues...
...then restrooms.
Heck.Use the mens room. Big deal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Are you male? I would not want to use the men's restroom even if
in Congress!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vanje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. no
I am not a male. Never have been.
Why should you care?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
30. your attitude of "well make the women use the men's room" struck me
as being something an uncaring male would say. Why should women have to use the men's room?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vanje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. How do you work it out at your house?
If a boy or man needs to pee at your house do you make him go outside?
or do you keep separate lavatories?

At my house, a single small bathroom is used by both males and females. Somehow we all survive.

(Oh the Humanity!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-25-06 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #37
42. We have separate bathrooms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-25-06 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
32. Yeah - they always stink!
Why is that, btw? It's not as though female emissions don't stink, too. Are we just cleaner afterwards?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. We do not miss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vanje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #33
47. We do not miss...until we exceed middle age
Sometime after age 40, things loosen up. Us old gals sometimes miss.
Didnt you know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. why should women have to be reduced to using the men's room
pray tell?

You don't think it's a big deal that the Speaker of the House doesn't even have a rest room?

Would you be this dismissive if the shoe was on the other foot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Why not just put a chamber pot under each seat?
After all, it is the "House chamber." :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. You mainframe programmers are such cads
:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Only because we've been locked in the 'puter room with only a chamber pot.
:evilgrin:

That's actually not far from the truth. When I was in the Army, working on a highly classified system, I was locked in the 'puter room for over 20 hours once and had to get the MP to escort me to the latrine and back when I had to go. I remember many 36-hour 'emergency' sessions working on critical maintenance - virtually camped in the 'puter room with a table, coding pad, and keypunch machine (019).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. LOL, Army E-5 me had to escort fresh out of boot camp Navy to john..
On my "highly classified system", when Pete's brother Paul showed up without the basic clearance you got out of boot camp, all we could do was put him in an office across from me and he would call across the hall when he had to go. My office had a Navy E-7, a Marine E-9 and me, guess who got escort duty.. :rofl:

I tried to introduce the Jovial heads to something call Cobol, but they would have nothing to do with it....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. There's already enough crap in that chamber.
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vanje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. If congressional women stared marching through the mens room in numbers,,
Edited on Sun Dec-24-06 03:58 PM by sheeptramp
They (we!) would get a congressional womans restroom post haste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
31. 1. Men's rooms are generally disgusting 2. Women should not have to
even have to do that. It should have been done forever ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
28. Why should a woman
Edited on Sun Dec-24-06 06:37 PM by Raine
have to use the men's room where there is most likely piss all over the floor.

EDIT: Clarity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Congress should lead the way in 'unisex' restrooms.
:evilgrin: After all, the stalls are more than adequate for privacy ... and pissoirs worked for centuries.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. someone's been watching too much "Ally McBeal"
:hi:

Merry Christmas :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. (Hugs!) Nawww.... there are unisex johns in Paris, still - on the left bank.
I've been to many sporting events where many of the saner women, rather than wait in some bizarre, long line, just used the 'mens' room where the stalls were open and every bit as functional as on the other side. If the situation were reversed, I'd have no problem using a stall in the 'womens' room - and I'm not at all immodest. (I used to be paranoid - now I'm just noid.)

:silly:


:loveya:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. And considering the windbags in Congress
It would be merely appropriate that chamberpots are also known in the South as.....


THUNDERMUGS!!!! :evilgrin:


That might be the most intelligent sound they make all day!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
15. If I were a female Congressperson I would walk in on the men
smiling and say, "Sorry, I couldn't hold it all the way to the ladies room". Nice little dick you got there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadmessengers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. Can someone explain this to me?
Why on earth would a "Women's Restroom Equity Bill" mandate that there be twice as many women's toilets as men's? That doesn't make a lot of sense to me, although I might be missing something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. you ever compare the length of line(s), in public forums,
of men restrooms compared to women's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. There'a also the issue of "frequency" to consider
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. that's true, too
i swear, the older I get the more often I have to go.

I probably will be needed to be fit for Depends soon....

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Well, let me tell you about being the proud owner of a prostate.
(no... as I think about it, I think I'll pass.) :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #24
35. LOL. This especially becomes "an issue of contention" on long road trips.
Edited on Sun Dec-24-06 08:43 PM by depakid
What? Again? You've got to be kidding me....

Alright, alright.

Obviously, the issue is less contentious and more

:wtf: to do when you're flying small aircraft with an SO and "frequency events" occur. Or maybe worse- what if she's the pilot!

There are ways around this of course, provided that you're both creative and plan ahead- and there are also several products on the market (Ah, free enterprise at work).

With respect to public service- (especially the military) it seems to me pretty clear that one size doesn't fit all:

To pee, or not to pee … Female aviators face a dilemma

"...Many of our flights were six hours long, with some reaching nine hours.

Besides our mission tasking, we had to "work around" basic bodily processes. Soiling oneself wasn't a worry for the males in our squadron, because they could urinate by using the Prowler relief tubes.

The females, however, had to worry about everything, which begins a debate over the proper way to prepare for long missions. It is not possible in the EA-6B for female aircrew to leave their seats and squat. Any such action would have to be done on top of the ejection seat, which is not safe.

Another option, slightly more practical, is using the strap-on Lady J device. This device acts as a funnel, guiding a woman's urine to the relief tube. This seems like a simple answer, but, maybe it's not. The Lady J device requires easy access to areas inaccessible when you're sitting in a seat or wearing a standard flight suit. There is an extended-fly flight suit out there that enables access, but acquiring one may be difficult.

The piddle pack, a time-honored relief device in many other platforms, is also a possibility. But, the same issue for women arises: They need some type of funnel to get urine to flow into the bag, or they have a messy situation. The piddle-pack option also requires an extended zipper for use in aircraft. In the past, females have stripped out of their gear, including flight suits, to use the piddle pack--moons over Afghanistan!"

.... http://www.safetycenter.navy.mil/media/approach/issues/mar03/ToPeeOrNot.htm

All I have to say after all of this is- Go Pelosi Go!








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. eek! To much information, , , , , ,, , , n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. I know, most of the facilities in modern structures...
are in the same 2:1 ratio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
25. I don't care to use the men's room
but I'd do it if I had to.

It's time to make room for women -- our place is in the House, and the Senate.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. lol
Julie, I used to own a tee-shirt with that printed on it :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
27. At the Library of Congress the women's restrooms are really FAAR away from the reading room...
on evenings and weekends it's really creepy. The men's room is MUCH closer.

I've complained to no avail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
36. This is a huge equality issue.
Are the close restrooms handicapped accessible, too? It would be bad to make someone in a wheelchair have to go really far, too.

I hate going to the theatre or something in an older building and then having to find the hidden women's restroom with its huge, long line. I've been in lines in which the women decide to take over the men's room, too, or otherwise we won't all be back by the end of intermission or the seventh inning stretch.

Nancy should be able to duck out quickly and get back in time. What if we have a pregnant mama in there soon? I taught when I was preggers for the first time, and my classroom was as far as you could get from the teacher's bathroom--there were times I was late to class with trying to rush down to the bathroom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. you bring up some very good points, Knitter
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. It's a sore subject with me.
:hi:

Seriously, though, you'd think we would have equality in this area by now. *sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-25-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #36
44. One of the newly elected is 36 years old...and about to get married.
She could be a pregnant mama soon! *hopes so*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-25-06 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. See--we need a close bathroom!
Help all the women, especially any preggers mamas on staff or duly elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-24-06 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
40. There's actually a fairly straightforward solution that solves another problem, too.
Edited on Sun Dec-24-06 09:32 PM by TahitiNut
Convert all the space dedicated to large 'conference' restrooms (including lounge and other amenities) into individual rooms (closets) with toilet and sink. Each and every one of them becomes 'unisex' - for one-person-at-a-time use. That way, the segregated 'social' opportunites disappear as well. It'd be like permanent porta-potties. Screw the segregation. Screw the locker room crap. There's really no overwhelming reason people need 'moral support' of a group to defecate or pee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-25-06 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. You've come a long way baby...read on in the article:
-snip-

For example, Schroeder famously won a spot on the coveted House Armed Services Committee upon her election, only to face the humiliation, along with California Democrat Ron Dellums, an African-American, of being told they'd have to share a chair.

The committee's chairman, F. Edward Hebert, D-La., explained that, to his thinking, women and blacks were worth half of one "regular" member. Hebert lost his chairmanship two years later in a revolt by younger Democrats.

-snip-

So now we're just arguing over bathrooms - not actual seats at the table. Lord have mercy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC