kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-26-06 10:29 AM
Original message |
How much should the multi-million dollar bonuses of Wall St. be taxed? |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-26-06 10:30 AM by kentuck
Many in the Wall Street firm of Goldman-Sachs received bonuses of several million dollars. The average bonus was reportedly $625,000 dollars per employee. The ones that received the big bonuses argue that they took the risk and therefore, are deserving of whatever they got. However, it was the stockholders that took the risk - not the individual executives.
Should we return to the 90% tax bracket? If not 90%, perhaps back to the 70% of the John Kennedy Administration? We are going down the same track we traveled in the 1920's when the business of America was business and taxcuts were cut similarly. Isn't it time we recognized the class war that is being waged upon the middle and lower classes? And isn't it time we fought back? The only way to fight back is to attack their pocket books. The only way we can do that is with our votes or the votes of those that elected to represent us. Should this not be addressed now?
|
valerief
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-26-06 10:30 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Mais non! You speak treason. We must let them "trickle it down" |
|
to "surge" the economy. :sarcasm:
|
lastknowngood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-26-06 10:30 AM
Response to Original message |
2. 100% they are just usless overhead who are destroying our country |
DocSavage
(594 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-26-06 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
20. You want to tax them more? |
|
Call your congressman. They pass the tax laws. But Congressmen and Senators will never pass legislation like that because the people that get money like that make the political donations. Untill then, they deserve the same protections under the law as everyone else. If the tax law is written for 36% then so be it.
|
bullimiami
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-26-06 10:31 AM
Response to Original message |
3. what risk did any of them take? they get obscene salaries and benefits already. |
|
this should be illegal. that money belongs to the shareholders. maximum bonuses should be something like 2 or 4 weeks salary for exceptional performance.
|
Lucky Luciano
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-26-06 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. Traders do take risks... |
|
they have zero job security...they can show up to work and be fired on the spot. A few bad trades and you may never work in the industry again. Those are risks...besides, I thought that workers are the ones who should get paid? Let's not forget that even with $16.5B in total comp that GS paid out to 26000 workers, the profits were still $9.5B - or $19.60 per share! Their P/E is still about 10ish. It is a well run business where all in it do well - not jsut the CEOs. The enemies, IMO, are the HALs, WMTs, Big Pharma, The Defense Industry, Big Oil, and the M$M. They are much much worse.
|
kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-26-06 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Is their risk any different from the rest of us? |
|
We don't know if we will have a job when we go in. With their present salaries, they have a better opportunity to save more of their money than someone that might work for much less? So, who's really taking a "risk"? I don't buy that argument.
|
Lucky Luciano
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-26-06 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. When compared to other members a bank, they have far |
|
more job volatility and those other members of the banks can be let go very easily too. Most are booted out of the industry (let alone the bank) within 5 years. Anyone that makes it 5 years is probably very well off - if they saved properly and avoided the fast lane as traders often don't. They are also comped well because there is an extremely small number of people able to do what they do. More taxes should be paid though. Britain actually has a decent system. My ex-boss is a Brit. He said the high bracket is around 40ish percent - but there are very few deductions and loopholes, so one generally has to pay the entire thing. That would be an enormous addition to the treasury....the only thing that makes me hesitant to do it is that it would only go towards the war machine - nowhere else. The people will not be helped and healthcare will not be made cheap for the most needy. It will go straight to the cronies of Dick Cheney.
|
kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-26-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. I think 40% tax rate is a little too generous for these vultures. |
|
Or perhaps there is a better adjective for them? :)
|
Lucky Luciano
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-26-06 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. Not really - I think if they actually paid it, |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-26-06 11:03 AM by Lucky Luciano
then there would be far more money in the treasury - FAR MORE! Maybe we could even have universal healthcare AND begin to pay down our outrageous debt.
I am so curious about a real study on the costs of universal healthcare. I bet it would not cost very much at all. There will be higher taxes on corporations, but htey would just pay the government instead of a health insurer - same bloody thing.
Only the healthcare industry and big pharma would have problems, but they can be compensated for being bought out by the government too. It would also bring down the costs of medicine without the profit motive. Of course, I have no numbers to back me up - It would be an interesting study though.
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-26-06 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. So they're fired... They're not dead. |
|
I have a little something for them: http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/infomgt/forms/eforms/dd0004.pdfThere's risk, and then there's risk.
|
Lucky Luciano
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-26-06 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. Yea, but what if they don't support the war! |
|
It is the biggest disgrace that so many good young men and women have had their lives wasted and/or put on the line for no good reason.
|
wakeme2008
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-26-06 10:32 AM
Response to Original message |
4. I really would be happy if they just paid 37% |
|
But in the end I bet they have more loop holes with those bonuses than swiss cheese...
|
Joanne98
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-26-06 10:33 AM
Response to Original message |
5. 90% and I'm not joking. These is obscene. |
DBoon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-26-06 10:59 AM
Response to Original message |
12. They shouldn't be taxed |
|
They shouldn't exist in the first place.
Why the heck are middlemen who trade trade paper getting so much money in the first place, when people who create real value get paid so little?
I'd fire all these hot shots, give them maybe $50,000 each, and send them to impoverished rural communities to build their own successful businesses. Then let's see how long these poseurs last.
|
Solo_in_MD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-26-06 11:03 AM
Response to Original message |
14. Eliminate our social engineering based tax structure |
|
then some progress could be made
|
Yavin4
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-26-06 11:07 AM
Response to Original message |
15. The Really Huge Problem with the Wall Street Bonuses... |
|
is that it will inspire even more greed. Now, every CEO will want to be compensated on the same basis as these Wall Street hot-shots. Thus, corporations will outsource more, pay even less to the workers, etc. in order to get their CEO the same bonus.
|
leftofthedial
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-26-06 11:17 AM
Response to Original message |
Wcross
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-26-06 11:35 AM
Response to Original message |
17. How much should professional athletes be taxed? |
|
Entertainers? Doctors? Lawyers? Lottery winners?
|
Crabby Appleton
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-26-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
19. professional athletes - 90% |
|
Entertainers - 90% Doctors - 80 % Lawyers - 200% Lottery winners - 25%
|
stillcool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-26-06 11:42 AM
Response to Original message |
18. I think the only ones |
|
that benefit from our tax system are those that have the power to legislate in their favor. For those injured by such legislation, the plea for examination to stop the bleeding is answered by certain qualifications concerning the seriousness of the wound. Band-aids provide temporary relief, because the wounded believe their injury has been addressed. It is only when the wound fails to heal, they question the doctors treatment.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:26 PM
Response to Original message |