Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Duke DNA Cover-Up Transcript

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
madmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 02:45 PM
Original message
Duke DNA Cover-Up Transcript

Mike

http://durhamwonderland.blogspot.com/2006/12/meehan-transcript.html">This is one of the most shocking court transcript I've ever read. If Mike Nifong is not disbarred after the (forthcoming, I'm certain) dismissal in the Duke rape hoax, then the North Carolina Bar should stop pretending that it enforces the laws governing lawyers, and simply disband itself.

http://federalism.typepad.com/crime_federalism/2006/12/duke_dna_coveru.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. that transcript is unbelievable
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's unfortunate that something scientifically sound...
is so abused. DNA is tool that can prove guilt AND innocence. It is not a toy and should not be played with like that.

ACLU of Texas testimony to the Senate Criminal Justice Committee
Houston Community College Conference Center, January 4, 2005
By Scott Henson, Director, Police Accountability Project

Framed innocents in Tulia and Hearne and false convictions based on bad forensic analysis have created a crisis of confidence in Texas’ criminal justice system. Please consider the following as you move to fix it:

Set reasonable expectations:

Don’t view the issue as atomic – crime lab lapses are a microcosm within a system geared toward maximizing the ease with which convictions can be obtained. Innocent people aren’t convicted because one lab technician makes an error. Innocents are convicted when the actors in the system don’t care that innocents are convicted. This committee should examine all the reasons innocent people are convicted, including but not just limited to the role of forensics.

more: http://gritsforbreakfast.blogspot.com/2005/01/aclu-of-texas-crime-lab-testimony-in.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nifong must be running on pure ego right now...
there's very little else that seems to be supporting any charges at all against these guys, other than his own hyper-inflated pigheadedness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC