|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-27-06 06:23 PM Original message |
Today's drug test ruling: What are the Constitutional ramifications? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WHEN CRABS ROAR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-27-06 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
1. The government will always get what it want's. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-27-06 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
2. K n R for more info! come on, people! what say ye? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nradisic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-27-06 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
3. It is the steroids... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hughee99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-27-06 07:12 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. The drug tests wouldn't provide any info on "dealing" just using... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conscious evolution (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-27-06 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
4. It seems like the 5th amendment would kick in then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 01:11 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. I was similarly thinking of the Fifth in terms of schools. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 03:36 PM Response to Reply #8 |
23. Deleted message |
madmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 03:30 PM Response to Reply #4 |
21. You got that backwards... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-27-06 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
6. It is a federal grand jury investigation, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 01:07 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. This IS drug testing at the workplace. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 02:21 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. You might want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 02:50 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Completely wrong, as usual. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 03:40 PM Response to Reply #6 |
24. If it is a regulation, it's probably legal... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 04:46 PM Response to Reply #24 |
36. He's just misunderstanding what people are talking about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
9. Drugs are illegal, the govt will crawl into our beds and check under |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
butterfly77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
10. I have always said... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sweetheart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 03:22 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. and very well said it is indeed. :-) nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrCoffee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
12. Today's ruling had nothing to do with drug tests |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 02:55 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. The ruling had to do with whether or not the drug test data |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrCoffee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 03:01 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. It's a much broader ruling than drug tests... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 04:05 PM Response to Reply #15 |
29. Thank you for admitting that you were completely wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrCoffee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 04:09 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. hey, whatever helps you feel better about yourself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 04:33 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. Didn't mean to snip, it's just that these are the very issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mythsaje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
16. Since everyone was so silent at the beginning of all this testing crap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
17. Major League Baseball enjoys special status under the law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 04:07 PM Response to Reply #17 |
30. The League enjoys status, but this is really about the rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mloutre (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
19. I don't have a problem with drug testing. I've tested bunches of 'em. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
20. I Think It's Unreasonable Search, and a Violation of the 5th Amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrCoffee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 03:34 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. what's unreasonable about it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 03:45 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. The slippery slope is the point, I think. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 04:01 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. This Is Not Unlike the Kansas Att'y General Demanding Abortion Records |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 04:09 PM Response to Reply #22 |
32. It's unreasonable if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrCoffee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 04:12 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. did you read the decision? that was the whole issue of the case, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 04:23 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Yes, that's why it's an issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joanne98 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
26. This won't stop into we fight back. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
27. Promises from corporations are worthless. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnnInLa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
37. WTF does this do the expectation of privacy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnnInLa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 04:59 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. oh, never mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 04:59 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Yes, if the baseball players thought for a second that the data |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-28-06 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
40. On CNN they said that the govt grabbed thousands of drug screening |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 03:20 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC