Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senator Barack Obama: Escalation Is Not The Answer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 11:07 AM
Original message
Senator Barack Obama: Escalation Is Not The Answer
Edited on Thu Dec-28-06 11:33 AM by Sapphire Blue
*********************************************************

Please call, write or email the pResident, and make YOUR voices heard.

*********************************************************


An email from the Senator...

Escalation Is Not The Answer

As the New Year approaches, we are told that the President is considering the deployment of tens of thousands of additional troops to Iraq in the desperate hope of subduing the burgeoning civil war there.

This is a chilling prospect that threatens to compound the tragic mistakes he has already made over the last four years.

In 2002, I strongly opposed the invasion of Iraq because I felt it was an ill-conceived venture which I warned would "require a U.S. occupation of undetermined length, at undermined cost, with undetermined consequences." I said then that an invasion without strong international support could drain our military, distract us from the war with al-Qaeda in Afghanistan and further destabilize the Middle East.

Sadly, all of those concerns have been borne out.

Today, nearly three thousand brave young Americans are dead, and tens of thousands more have been wounded. Rather than welcomed "liberators," our troops have become targets of the exploding sectarian violence in Iraq. Our military has been strained to the limits. The cost to American taxpayers is approaching $400 billion.

Now we are faced with a quagmire to which there are no good answers. But the one that makes very little sense is to put tens of thousands more young Americans in harm's way without changing a strategy that has failed by almost every imaginable account.

In escalating this war with a so-called "surge" of troops, the President would be overriding the expressed concerns of Generals on the ground, Secretary Powell, the bipartisan Iraq Study Group and the American people. Colin Powell has said that placing more troops in the crossfire of a civil war simply will not work. General John Abizaid, our top commander in the Middle East, said just last month that, "I believe that more American forces prevent the Iraqis from doing more, from taking more responsibility for their own future." Even the Joint Chiefs of Staff have expressed concern, saying that a surge in troop levels "could lead to more attacks by al-Qaeda" and "provide more targets for Sunni insurgents." Once again, the President is defying good counsel and common sense.

As I said more than a month ago, while some have proposed escalating this war by adding thousands of more troops, there is little reason to believe that this will achieve these results either. It's not clear that these troop levels are sustainable for a significant period of time, and according to our commanders on the ground, adding American forces will only relieve the Iraqis from doing more on their own. Moreover, without a coherent strategy or better cooperation from the Iraqis, we would only be putting more of our soldiers in the crossfire of a civil war.

There is no military solution to this war. Our troops can help suppress the violence, but they cannot solve its root causes. And all the troops in the world won't be able to force Shia, Sunni, and Kurd to sit down at a table, resolve their differences, and forge a lasting peace. In fact, adding more troops will only push this political settlement further and further into the future, as it tells the Iraqis that no matter how much of a mess they make, the American military will always be there to clean it up.

That is why I believe we must begin a phased redeployment of American troops to signal to the government and people of Iraq, and others who have a stake in stabilizing the country - that ours is not an open-ended commitment. They must step up. The status quo cannot hold.

In November, the American people sent a resounding message of change to the President. But apparently that message wasn't clear enough.

I urge all Americans who share my grave concerns over this looming decision to call, write or email the President, and make your voices heard. I urge you to tell them that our soldiers are not numbers to add just because someone couldn't think of a better idea, they are our sons and daughters, our brothers and sisters, our neighbors and friends who are willing to wave goodbye to everything they've ever known just for the chance to serve their country. Our men and women in uniform are doing a terrific job under extremely difficult conditions. But our government has failed them so many times over the last few years, and we simply cannot afford to do it again. We must not multiply the mistakes of yesterday, we must end them today.

May this New Year bring a turn in our policy away from the stubborn repetition of our mistakes, so we can begin to chart a conclusion to this painful chapter in our history and bring our troops home.

Sincerely,

U.S. Senator Barack Obama

Please call, write or email the pResident, and make your voices heard!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. mealy mouth BS - too bad he didnt call for the removal of US troops from IRAQ
the new messiah says "...a phased redeployment of American troops..". why not call for removal of US troops from Iraq? A phased redeployment is a meaningless nothing statement which avoids taking a stand. A phased redeployment could mean moving somebody across the street or into the next room. Or it could mean moving from north to south or east to west. It does NOT say mean removal from a country or war zone.

Here Barack, say this: "I call for the complete removal of US forces from Iraq by (insert date here)".

Come on Obama, stand for something while you are out there raking in the $$ selling your books.

Commit yourself instead of hemming and hawing.

Msongs
www.msongs.com
batik & digital art
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't disagree with you; but this is a step in the right direction.
He may not be a fearless leader, but he's moving in the right direction. Let's hope others are as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It is a step forward - last June he wouldn't support Kerry-Feingold withdrawal plan
Edited on Thu Dec-28-06 02:49 PM by blm
when every lawmaker in DC already KNEW that Iraq was in Civil War and had been since the beginning of the year, and the year before he wouldn't sign on to a Senate Letter of Inquiry for an investigation into the Downing Street Memos.

I am hoping Obama changes his mind some more and will finally ADD his support for investigations into WHY and HOW the Iraq war came about. I think it's kinda odd that someone would say they always knew the war was a bad idea but then say there is no reason to investigate how and why it came to be. Just doesn't compute. I think Obama is just now reaching out to the base because he sees a real chance there, and hopefully he will take that opportunity to gain inroads with the anti-corruption, open government wing of the party instead of staying in the Clinton camp where coverups are the mainstay of that wing of the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. By redeployment I'm sure he means out of Iraq, at least.
I don't think he's being mealy-mouthed, I just don't think he expects that people like you will interpret his words the way you have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. The problem with Obama's call to contact Bushie is that Bushie
doesn't give a shit what any of us think--and has said so on more than one occasion.

So, any other ideas, Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC