I don't know about y'all, but next to the war and the stolen elections, this is about the most outrageous thing i believe they have foisted upon us. and i am outraged. for all the good it does. and i'll betcha dollars to donut's there ain't gonna be any milk or meat from cloned animals on the tables of the members of the FDA or anyone else that's part of shrubco.-nosmokes
--###--
original-gm watchFDA set to OK food from cloned animals TODAY (28/12/2006)
GM WATCH COMMENT: According to this Associated Press piece, the US government is expected to declare today that cloned animals are safe to go into the human food supply.
There has, of course, been no public debate about whether US citizens, let alone the recipients of US exports, wish to consume milk and meat from cloned animals.
And this isn't just an issue of democratic deficit.
A spokesman for the Biotechnology Industry Organization is quoted in the article as saying, "We clone an animal because we want a genetic twin of that animal. It's not a genetically engineered animal; no genes have been changed or moved or deleted."
But we know clones are very far indeed from perfect copies and that all clones are, in one way or another, defective with multiple flaws embedded in their genomes. Rudolf Jaenisch, a geneticist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, estimates that something like 4-5% of the genes in a cloned animal's genome are expressed incorrectly.
And these genetic defects can have tangible results - some subtle and hard to reckon but others all too clear. Some clones have been born with incomplete body walls or with abnormalities in their hearts, kidneys or brain function, or have suffered problems like "adult clone sudden death syndrome" and premature ageing.
~snip~
.
.
.
complete article, including link to an AP report
here