Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheney's Vice Presidency Unconstitutional???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 09:00 PM
Original message
Cheney's Vice Presidency Unconstitutional???
Edited on Thu Dec-28-06 09:01 PM by cui bono
Thanks to starroute's post: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=2984140&mesg_id=2984835
of this Rolling Stone article about Cheney: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/6450422/the_curse_of_dick_cheney
I read the following:

Since Cheney lived in Texas at the time, choosing him led Bush into a situation that, if the words of our Founding Fathers still have any meaning, is unconstitutional. The Constitution forbids a state's electors from voting for candidates for president and vice president who are both "an inhabitant of the same state as themselves." Yet by voting for Bush and Cheney, electors in Texas did precisely that. Cheney lived in Texas, had a Texas driver's license and filed his federal income tax using a Texas address. He had also voted in Texas, not in Wyoming, a state where he had not lived full-time for decades.

I googled for more info and all I have come up with so far is from wikipedia's Vice Presidency entry:

The Constitution also prohibits electors from voting for both a Presidential and Vice Presidential candidate from the same state as themselves. In theory, this might deny a Vice Presidential candidate with the most electoral votes the absolute majority required to secure election, even if the Presidential candidate is elected, and place the Vice Presidential election in the hands of the Senate. In practice, this requirement is easily circumvented by having the candidate for Vice President change the state of residency as was done by Dick Cheney, who changed his legal residency from Texas to Wyoming, his original homestate, in order to run for election as Vice President alongside George W. Bush, who was then the governor of Texas.

So did Cheney get his residency changed in time? Was it a legal maneuver? Or is his holding of that office unconstutional?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. There was a lawsuit, but the judge dismissed it. NT
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ah, okay, thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Right he lived worked voted in Texas
but claimed he was not a Texas resident..... All BS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Chenney Was A Wyoming Resident...
A bunch of us argued Chenney's residency in the 2000 election. The "explanation" was that while Chenney had a residence in Texas, he still maintained his voting registration in Wyoming (even though no proof of such a registration was ever produced). If I remember, there was also a call to prove that Chenney had voted in Wyoming in recent elections and somehow some record showed up that "proved" he wasn't a Texan.

Nice try...it'd sure be nice to disqualify this entire regime on a 6 year old technicality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Cheney raced back to Wyoming, registered to vote there and
was miraculously transformed from Texican to Wyomaniac..even though he was truly a resident of texas, and had been for decades.. :grr:

of course after some serious judge-shopping, they found one who said it was okee-dokee :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Gee I wonder how that happened? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good find You would think somebody would have find it
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. Wow!! This is good news!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. Do you all remember who led Bush's search for someone to serve with him as a VP candidate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Golden Raisin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. Ironic since the Bush/Cheney years have taught us
that the Constitution doesn't mean much anymore and is wheezing perilously on life support. The new Dem Congress better start propping up & restoring our Constitution on Day 1. It's been under vicious & relentless attack for the last 6 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. I think the list of things this administration has done Constitutionally is shorter. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC