phillysuse
(683 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 09:46 PM
Original message |
Cong Gerald Ford tried to impeach Justice Douglas |
|
For those of you caught up in the mourning for dear President Gerald Ford and too young to remember, it was Ford, as a right wing Republican Congressman, who tried again and again to impreach Justice William O. Douglas.
Conservative Republicans hated Douglas. Douglas was appointed by Roosevelt in 1939. He served for 36 years, longer than any other Supreme Court Justice in American history and faced impeachment three times which is also a record. During the 1950, he faced impeachment twice. First, he suggested that the US should form closer ties with China putting a wedge between its Communist government and that of the USSR. That is exactly what Richard Nixon did. But Douglas was accused of being a Communist! In 1953, Justice Douglas stayed the execution of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg and was again accused of being a communist and an obstructionist judge. In the 1960's he criticized Nixon's efforts to limit the Bill of Rights and dissented on cases involving government surveillance of civil rights and anti-war activists. He was in the majority for the Pentagon Papers decision. He antagonized the self righteous Republicans when he ruled that the US Customs Office could not confiscate the so called pornographic film "I Am Curious Yellow". But what really forced Gerald Ford to move for impeachment was Douglas's personal life. Douglas divorced his first wife in the early 1950's becoming the first divorced member of the Supreme Court. His second wife was 18 years younger and left her husband for Douglas. In the 1960's, he divorced and married two more women, both of whom were more than 40 years younger than he. He married for the last time to his 4th wife in 1966 and she was 22 years old at the time. That was too much for Gerald Ford and the Republicans. They were green with envy.
The mounting calls for his impeachment forced Minority Leader Gerald Ford to call for his impeachment in 1970. His "liberal opinions" were cited as well as "his defense of the filthy film, "I Am Curious Yellow." He was acused of being an associate of and acceptimg money from a business man, who was said to be connected to organized crime. He was criticized for being paid $350.00 for writing an article on folk music for a magazine, Avant Garde, because the magazine's publisher had served a prison sentence for the distribution of another magazine said to be pornographic. Ford stated "The article itself is not pornographic, although it praises the lusty, lurid and risque along with the social protest of left-wing folk singers." The final charge was connected with the magazine "Evergreen." An except from Douglas's 1970 book, "Points of Rebellion" was included in an issue. Ford acused Douglas of violating the "good behavior" requirement for justices by allowing his book to be excerpted in what was viewed as a "pornographic hippie" magazine. Republican memebers of the impeachment committee were criticized for not sharing the issue with the Democrats. This prompted Ohio Democratic Congressman Wayne Hays to ask, "Has anybody read the article - or is everybody over there who has a magazine just looking at the pictures?" The article in question by Douglas turned out to be a discussion of the U.S. Forestry Service and the interstate highway system. This brought the impeachment proceedings to a close and Douglas was not found guilty of anything.
So I for one will not mourn Gerald Ford. I will remember that he was against the Bill of Rights, that he did not understand the Constitution long before he pardoned the criminal Richard Nixon. I only regret that he took up space on this earth for as long as he did. Better he should have left us years ago.
|
burrowowl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 09:53 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Go to yesterday's Amy Goodman Democracy Now and she what happened with Timor.
|
MichiganVote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 10:06 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Wrong string partner, belongs in GD or GDP/not LBN |
phillysuse
(683 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Actually it belongs in Forgotten History |
|
Those who forget history are condemned to repeat it.
|
LiberalFighter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 10:13 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Agreed... he was nothing but a shill |
bullimiami
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 10:15 PM
Response to Original message |
5. and now we have justices on the court who sold our country out for power. |
|
they broke their oaths of office and participated in treason against the constitution and the voters and yet they sit and are not impeached.
|
BrklynLiberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 10:17 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Point well taken. Thank you. |
Psephos
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-28-06 10:20 PM
Response to Original message |
7. The truth is a bit less dramatic |
|
Ford used talk of Douglas' impeachment as a political strategy.
The Democratic Congress would not endorse Nixon’s conservative Supreme Court nominees. As Minority Leader, Ford struck back by asking the House to consider whether there were grounds for impeaching the Douglas. He did not intend to impeach Douglas any more than Charlie Rangel intended there to actually be a draft.
Dems sidestepped Ford's parry, but Ford achieved what he wanted: increased perception that he wasn't a toothless dog.
Peace.
|
Judi Lynn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 06:29 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Thanks for posting this information, phillysuse. Never heard it yet, and it's certainly better |
|
late than never.
It's completely credible, unfortunately.
Welcome to D.U. ! :hi: :hi: :hi:
|
malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 06:34 AM
Response to Original message |
jaksavage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 01:21 PM
Response to Original message |
10. End the rule of uptight white men. |
JudyM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 06:41 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Impeach for Scalia for citing the Bible as support for his wacky opinions. |
|
Edited on Fri Dec-29-06 06:42 PM by JudyM
He's an unpatriotic scoundrel if he uses the Bible as justification for limiting folks' constitutional rights, I say.
|
midnight
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. Is that what this judge is using to determine his cases? |
walldude
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. Please... his owners and his wallet determine how he votes |
|
the bible is just what he uses to pretend he has morals.
|
dflprincess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 08:43 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Has anyone else noticed whether or not any MSM reports on Ford |
|
mention that he was a member of the Warren Commission? I haven't caught any that did (though I haven't paid that much attention either). I find it interesting that that's not being talked about.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:38 AM
Response to Original message |