A scenario that gets interesting responses

[SHRED]

I posted this up on "mixed" forums and the RW'ers give some funny answers.

----

Take a step back...
A step or two back from "nationalism" and taking sides.
Take a step away and look, as if looking at the Iraq situation from a visitor to this planet's viewpoint.

Who has caused more death, maiming, destruction, chaos, displacement, and destabilization of the region and the world, by their actions?

W or Saddam?

[illinoisprogressive]

1. So, what did the righties say.

that would be an insightful thing. what did they say about the question

[SHRED]

3. Hold your nose...

...here is one:

"well, Bush wouldn't be there without Sadaam...

...so, Sadaam."

[illinoisprogressive]

4. That is a stupid reason, dont' you think

If anyone on the right paid attention to facts they'd know the neocons have been plotting world change since the Ford Administration with Plan b

[HereSince1628]

2. And the rw response is like which of the following?

You can't plant a field without plowing the native plants out of existance.
You can't make an omlet without breaking a few eggs.
You can't do urban renewel without knocking down buildings.
You can't remake the planet unless you first cleanse it with fire.