Pierre.Suave
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 08:48 PM
Original message |
How about a Gore/Edwards ticket? |
|
Has this combination been discussed yet?
I think that would be a good one.
Discuss.
|
Clark2008
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 08:49 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Nothing with Edwards on it. |
|
But, Gore, I'll take whole-heartedly.
|
Warren DeMontague
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 08:59 PM
Original message |
Why not, if you don't mind my asking? |
|
Frankly, right now I have trouble seeing myself enthused about a ticket with Hillary or Kerry on it, but Edwards doesn't bother me that much.
|
Phredicles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 08:50 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Didn't Edwards say he was done running for veep? |
|
Can't say I blame him. I'd happily vote for such a ticket, but I don't see it happening.
|
bklyncowgirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 08:50 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I like Gore/Obama a bit better but Gore/Edwards sounds good too. Sadly, unless big Al decides to run it's not going to happen.
|
madokie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 08:52 PM
Response to Original message |
4. if it has democratic anywhere on the ticket I'll vote for it |
|
and I wouldn't give a damn if it was willard the rat I will vote for him if he is a democrat. if for no other reason than to help keep a re:puke: out
|
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 08:52 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Would that be 'southern' enough?? |
|
After all, God forbid either party have a national ticket without a candidate from the south, right?
|
madeline_con
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 08:52 PM
Response to Original message |
vanboggie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 08:56 PM
Response to Original message |
7. That's been my fave for months |
|
Though I don't think Gore will run, so I'll back Edwards as far as he takes it - hopefully to the White House.
|
SharonRB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 08:58 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Anything with Gore at the top of the ticket works for me |
|
except for Gore/Lieberman, that is (hmmmmm....where have I heard that before?).
I think Gore/Edwards could be good, but I doubt Edwards will take the #2 slot again.
|
Southsideirish
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. Gore/Obama - a ticket made in DemocratIC heaven! |
|
Edited on Fri Dec-29-06 08:59 PM by Southsideirish
Can I have an "AMEN" ??????
|
SharonRB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. You get a big Amen from me! |
Warren DeMontague
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 08:58 PM
Response to Original message |
9. I'd prefer Gore/Feingold or Gore/Clark, but Gore/Edwards would be okay. nt |
hippiechick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
:loveya: :applause: :bounce: Now there's the ticket!!! :loveya: :applause: :bounce:
|
Crunchy Frog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 08:59 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I would prefer to have a ticket with two people who opposed the Iraq fiasco from the start.
|
pitohui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 09:10 PM
Response to Original message |
12. gore had his shot, he didn't want it enough to fight for it |
|
granted he could not have known how bad it would get when he allowed the coup to go forward, but we do know now, and we need a fighter
clark, edwards, clinton, obama -- i don't care, just get me someone who wants it badly and will fight and isn't already perceived as having "blown it"
why not edwards/gore?
|
NYCGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
17. Right. He only fought it for six weeks, right up to the Supreme Court, |
|
Edited on Fri Dec-29-06 09:34 PM by NYCGirl
And without the help of his running mate, without the help of his party. He should have gunned down the SCOTUS, I guess.
Edited to add: :eyes:
|
DaveinMD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 09:30 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Edwards is not running for VP again |
|
and most of the time the VP choice is someone who wasn't in the presidential race. 2004 was a major exception.
|
wiley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 09:31 PM
Response to Original message |
calimary
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-29-06 09:35 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Only thing better would be Gore/Obama. |
|
Imagine that along with Attorney General John Edwards and Defense Secretary Wesley Clark. Secretary of State... hmm... wouldn't Bill Clinton be an OUTRAGEOUS pick? He'd almost certainly turn it down, but it sure would be nice to have his influence at work in the State Department.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:24 PM
Response to Original message |