Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush admin. backs off promise to reduce Mideast oil imports (surprise!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 08:51 PM
Original message
Bush admin. backs off promise to reduce Mideast oil imports (surprise!)
http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/news/nation/13767738.htm?source=rss&channel=krwashington_nation

Administration backs off Bush's vow to reduce Mideast oil imports
By Kevin G. Hall
Knight Ridder Newspapers

WASHINGTON - One day after President Bush vowed to reduce America's dependence on Middle East oil by cutting imports from there 75 percent by 2025, his energy secretary and national economic adviser said Wednesday that the president didn't mean it literally.

What the president meant, they said in a conference call with reporters, was that alternative fuels could displace an amount of oil imports equivalent to most of what America is expected to import from the Middle East in 2025.

But America still would import oil from the Middle East, because that's where the greatest oil supplies are.

...more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, that's what the fruitcake meant
He "misspoke" once again. Tough having an idiot as president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. that didn't take long
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPisEvil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Less than 24 hours. Is that some sort of record?
But, the headline was "addicted to oil". This story won't get as much play. Damned liebrul media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 03:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. Not if you count the lies he tells after the fact...
Like the education budget. There he reneged in negative-3 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaLynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Dang, that was fast! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Flipity, flipity flip flop. ..... Boy, that was quick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carolinalady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. From what I heard we only get about 25percent of our oil from
there anyways. I think I heard the majority comes from Canada and South America, but I could be and probably am wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wow, why am I not surprised? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. As Long As He Keeps His Promise to Ban Human-Animal Hybrids
I'm ok w/ this.

BAT BOY MUST DIE!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
9. this isn't a flip-flop . . . he out and out lied . . .
to the American people and to the world . . . and you can bet your boots this wasn't the only statement in the SOTU that was an out and out lie . . . it's what Bush does best . . .

and the media, of course, never calls him on it . . . because the five or so conglomerates that control 90% of the US media are firmly in the BushCo camp . . . and what gets reported is only what they want reported -- nothing more, nothing less -- and truth and accuracy are irrelevant . . . in other times, this was called propaganda . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. The Prince must have called him up over night
Edited on Thu Feb-02-06 01:51 AM by aint_no_life_nowhere
and threatened not to come to Crawford for his annual frolic among the Bluebonnets this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
11. they are just back to "clarifying" what he said
Remember, not so long ago, every time he spoke there would be someone out there within 24 hours to tell us what he really meant? I remember that very clearly.

It's pretty bad when you have to spin the spin, isn't it? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
12. Whew! That's a relief
Those humanitarians at Exxon-Mobil can start shopping for 16th century chateaux now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
13. Wamm, bamm, thank you Betsy.
Geeze, talk about pResidentile dysfunction.

Still, I think of every time he gets a photo op and how sad it is for anyone in that photo with him, because they are so screwed once he's gotten what he needs from them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highnooner Donating Member (373 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
15. Now, we know why....
He quickly bowed to pressure from Saudi Arabia.

The president's tone was so changed, in fact, that some analysts said he sounded like a Democrat. Dan W. Reicher, who served in the Energy Department during the Clinton administration, said Mr. Bush's ideas showed "an uncanny resemblance" to some Clinton efforts. :rofl:

<snip>

The administration's more immediate international brushfire after the president's address was Saudi Arabia, the world's largest oil supplie. Analysts said they were startled that Mr. Bush had singled out the Middle East with implicit criticism, and on the very day that the Saudis provided important support for American interests at a meeting in Vienna of ministers from the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries.

At the meeting, Saudi Arabia blocked an effort by Venezuela and Iran to reduce the group's oil production.

In Washington, Prince Turki, the Saudi ambassador, said he was puzzled by Mr. Bush's words in the speech. He said he wanted to know if reducing American dependence on foreign oil also applied to other suppliers to the United States. "Is that a declaration that the U.S. is going to work to be independent of Canadian oil, Mexican oil and Venezuelan oil?" he asked, adding, "I see no threat from America from receiving its oil from the Middle East."

http://www.finfacts.com/irelandbusinessnews/publish/article_10004741.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
16. I thought he meant ANNEX IRAQ so its oil would be domestic, and open ANWR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC