Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Plans To Up Retirement Savings May Garner Bipartisan Support

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-31-06 01:26 AM
Original message
Plans To Up Retirement Savings May Garner Bipartisan Support
http://www.investors.com/editorial/IBDArticles.asp?artsec=16&issue=20061226

The two parties may be at loggerheads over the issue of personal investment accounts within Social Security. But legislation to encourage retirement accounts for low and moderate earners still might be on the agenda for the next Congress. The idea of providing universal access to 401(k)s and IRAs has appeal to both Democrats and Republicans. In the past session of Congress, sensible pension reforms got traction while Social Security reform went nowhere, noted William Gale, director of economic studies at the Brookings Institution. "It's possible that will continue," Gale said. Members of Congress may decide to "do the things we can do and the things we can agree on without getting mired down in topics" that defy bipartisan agreement. In the 2006 pension reform bill, Congress took steps to shield from liability companies that automatically enroll workers in 401(k) plans.

The logic of automatic enrollment is clear, said Heritage Foundation senior fellow David John. Participating in a plan requires workers to make three decisions that may pose challenges, particularly for those with modest incomes, he said. "Do I participate? How much do I save? And what do I put it in?" Under automatic enrollment, those decisions are made for you, though you can change the default selections. "Unless you say no, you will be in the system," John said. Research studies have shown that auto-enrollment could lift participation from about 70% to as much as 90% of workers provided with access to a 401(k), John said.

Opt-out 401(k) plans would have a much bigger impact on new employees, especially low-wage staff, boosting participation to 86% from the current system's 37%. Some proposals would go much further, expanding 401(k) and IRA access to the about 50% of workers whose employers don't offer 401(k)-type plans. This would provide workers with the simplicity of savings via payroll deduction. Under a proposal co-authored by Gale, Congress would require all but the smallest firms to automatically enroll new workers in a 401(k)-type plan, a traditional defined benefit pension or an IRA.

Their proposal also would provide for the automatic escalation of the default savings percentage over time, as income gains make greater saving possible. An automatic IRA plan co-authored by John would require any company that has been in business more than two years and has at least 10 employees to provide workers with such an account, if it doesn't offer 401(k) access. Under John's plan, employers would receive a small tax credit to offset the cost of setting up such an account. Workers would get a form that gives them the choice of opting out. These auto IRAs would provide workers a limited range of investment options patterned after the Thrift Savings Plan for federal employees. John said the idea is "noncontroversial" and would let Republicans and Democrats show they can work together and accomplish something important.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-31-06 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. The ONE fly in the ointment?
"Lower wage earners" can't make it on what they take home NOW.. where are the gonna get the "extra" money to save for retirement?

Retirement was a fact of life for a select few.. (Parents of Boomers)..These were the ones who were in their prime (20'- 40's) in the glory days of cheap houses, cheap energy, defined benfit pensions & unions .. It all "came together" for them..

they got the (almost) free college, and good jobs. By the time they retired, things were still humming along. medicare was still working well, new medical advances gave them extra years and their children (Boomers) took a huge hit to boost their SS payments and to pre-pay for Boomer retirement)..

they were the last ones to enjoy what middle class had to offer. their parents wete grownups during the depression, and their children reaped the benefits of what they fought for. (I am NOT negating the wartime struggle, but ANY young generation would have done the same, in the same circumstances)..

Every generation seems to get a leg-up from the one before..until now.. Our legs are being chiseled away..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC