Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

the Future of Joe Lieberman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-31-06 04:54 PM
Original message
the Future of Joe Lieberman
He has a swing vote, potentially. Therefore, he is potentially dangerous to the future of the US. He is firmly in the grip of AIPAC, and therefore, of the neoconmen still infesting our White House, DOD, and State. He is unashamedly in favor of invading Iran. He loves the Iraq quagmire and thinks we are on the right track and will win. Hell, he just said so after traveling to Israel and meeting with "Middle East Leaders". Oh, yes, he stopped in at Turkey for a short while, too. I do NOT believe that he actually went to Lebanon, Syria, Iran, or most importantly, Iraq.

He loves the limelight. He has no shame. He plays a pious, pleasant, placating patriot, when he truly is self-dealing, egotistical and convinced the Iraq and Iran must be under US and Israeli domination.

He forgets one thing. The population has shifted radically since his indie run. barely 1 out of 4 people can support the president's economic and war-mongering policies. Fewer find W worthy of their trust. If Joe continues to hang on to the neocon apron, he will find himself mighty unpopular, mighty soon. I suspect that after a few public displays of Connecticut's growing disaffection with him, he may be begging W to appoint him to the UN. I can easily envision people protesting him both in DC and his home state. His ego can't handle too much of that.

I have mixed emotions on that. What would a Lierbman presence in the UN do, other than to put a smiley face on Bolton-like policies? And who would replace him in the Senate?

Let's assume that he is a arrogant, petulant and unresponsive as the Boy King, that he remains a senator, and labels himself a democrat (little d). Should any Democrat caucus, committee, meeting or strategy session take place, they had better beware. It would be akin to having KKKarl Rove sitting in on the meeting.

So other than to gather where he is present, early and often, and voice our objections, what can we do about good ole Joe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-31-06 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Eliminate Joe's leverage by electing more Dem senators in '08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC