Halliburton
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:07 PM
Original message |
BREAKING: SCALITO SIDES WITH LIBERAL JUSTICES IN FIRST RULING |
greenbriar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:08 PM
Response to Original message |
1. don't buy it...its a trick |
|
don't look into the light
|
debbierlus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:09 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Who knows...He may have been shaken from our protest |
|
Maybe, he is going to be hypersensitive to his rulings knowing how strongly he was oppossed.
Probably not, but weirder things have happened.
He is on the court now.
His position is safe.
|
electropop
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. Maybe he out-Roved Rove? |
|
Faked being a reactionary asshole for 25 years so he could sneak onto the Court and do good?
Nah. Just got confused and checked the wrong box because he's inexperienced in Court procedures.
|
GrumpyGreg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:15 PM
Original message |
electropop
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:26 PM
Response to Original message |
22. Warren's transformation wasn't quite as dramatic, |
|
but still his precedent offers a tiny glimmer of hope. Perhaps now that Alito doesn't have to worry about politics any longer, he'll begin to listen to his conscience. Or perhaps he'll continue to be an asshole. Time will tell.
|
Charlie Brown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
31. I know it's not likely, but |
|
it would be so damn funny if he turned out to be another Warren or Souter.
|
Charlie Brown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:10 PM
Response to Original message |
3. This is just lip-service |
|
He wants to build up collateral for when he embarks on a conservative tirade.
|
AntiFascist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
13. Right, just wait for the one ruling that's going to make our heads explode |
FreedomAngel82
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
marmar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
He's just trying to dupe people into thinking he's not so bad, then he'll get real 1860s on us.
|
MakeItSo
(351 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:10 PM
Response to Original message |
4. i'm gonna get in trouble here |
|
but my sister-in-law's dad is a lawyer in NJ and a dyed in the wool democrat. he's worked quite a bit next to alito and he has a lot of respect for him as a jurist.
it's heresay, but who knows.
no i'm not a freeper troll, folks. and i am nervous about the abortion issue and anti-trust and environmental rulings too.
|
helderheid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
9. hope you're right, errrr correct! :) |
judy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
25. That would be great... |
|
I won't hold my breath, but you never know...
|
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:11 PM
Response to Original message |
5. I Always Hold On To Hope. But It Will Take More Than One Ruling. |
|
But nonetheless, I'm glad he ruled this way this time. I hope it becomes a trend.
|
judy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:11 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Also, Alito is a Catholic, possibly a member of Opus Dei |
|
Remember that the Catholic Church opposes the death penalty. Not really a surprise there... He will probably rule with the Catholics on Roe v. Wade as well.
|
KittyWampus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
Charlie Brown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
16. Roberts, Thomas, and Scalia are also Catholic |
|
This was an extremely odd line-up.
Kennedy is Catholic, too, but he's voted to maintain Roe before.
|
slaveplanet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
Edited on Wed Feb-01-06 11:40 PM by slaveplanet
Strip search innocent 10 year old girls?
Is it Catholic to go directly in the face of Constitution when it comes to people being secure in their privacy and effects?
|
judy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
23. Well, the Pope has never said anything about |
|
strip searching 10 year olds, for or against, and personal privacy is definitely not a Catholic notion.
|
slaveplanet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
|
ever expects the Inquisition
and personal privacy is definitely not a Catholic notion
yet millions of Irish Catholics had the notion to place as much privacy as possible, between themselves and the crown.
I guess it all boils down to which flavor Catholic you're dealing with
|
tocqueville
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
32. because it's a Protestantic maybe ? |
longship
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:11 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Careful for the Rope-A-Dope, my friend. |
|
We need to wait and see. Now that we're stuck with Scalito...
|
MakeItSo
(351 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. Sometimes they end up morphing after they get tenure |
|
We need to hook this guy up with a) a gay golf buddy and b) a really sexy liberal woman who can get some pillow time with him.
|
longship
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-02-06 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
33. Or, maybe a pretty intern or two? |
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:12 PM
Response to Original message |
10. see how he rules if cases come up on wire taps |
|
Edited on Wed Feb-01-06 11:13 PM by still_one
seperation of powers, a woman's right to chose, and civil rights, and unauthorized wire taps
|
mvd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:14 PM
Response to Original message |
12. He would be one of the biggest surprises in.. |
|
political history if he's an independent thinker. I thought Roberts might be a little independent, and so far he's been a big disappointment. You never know, but I'm not convinced until we're further out from the contentious confirmation.
|
MakeItSo
(351 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
18. I really don't think they're going to do in Roe |
|
The Repubs rely on Roe to split the poor from their own economic self-interests. They use it to get the rural working class base.
What they ARE most definitely going to do is rule in favor of corporations and corporate interests and against the public interest. Which isn't what we need at all.
It's not a hot-button issue but it should be.
|
mvd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
20. What I'm worried about is |
|
the prospect of the religious right staying home in 2008 if they don't finally get results. So I don't think Roe is safe. Roberts sounded like Kennedy on Roe, so we'll see.
|
Charlie Brown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
21. After 40 years, it would be extremely bizarre to reverse Roe |
|
Edited on Wed Feb-01-06 11:27 PM by Charlie Brown
The court would be undercutting the livelihood of quite a number of clinics and creating a mindbogglingly confusing federal commerce situation regarding where doctors could work and what services they could offer.
I'm not sure if Scalia, Thomas, Roberts, etc. will find it worth the trouble of reversing the decision.
|
MakeItSo
(351 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
26. That book "What's the Matter with Kansas" opened my eyes |
|
Edited on Wed Feb-01-06 11:31 PM by MakeItSo
to how much the Right Wing relies on Roe to solidify its base. If Roe goes away, then the lawmakers in the Taliban states are no longer off the hook -- abortion becomes THEIR problem, not the court's problem. With Roe, they get single-issue anti-choice poor people to vote against the minimum wage, health care access etc.
|
slaveplanet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
|
and don't forget the unitary executive they will use to hand Shrub "Pope like" power
|
jsamuel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:17 PM
Response to Original message |
17. It is one ruling and this one was right. Lets keep our eyes peeled for |
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:38 PM
Response to Original message |
29. Maybe his reputation for being the one dissenting opinion is |
|
that he dissents no matter what the prevailing opinion is. If so, that could be hilarious. Bush appointed a judge who is going to side with the lesser judges (liberals), just because he likes to do that.
I'm afraid though this is probably a fluke.
|
tritsofme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-01-06 11:41 PM
Response to Original message |
30. Being that this is first day on the Court |
|
he may have erred on the side of caution since he might not have had time to review all the information.
I suspect he'll take his seat next to master Scalia very soon.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:22 AM
Response to Original message |