Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Cindy Sheehan debacle NEEDS to be exposed in the mainstream...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
King_Crimson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 08:04 AM
Original message
The Cindy Sheehan debacle NEEDS to be exposed in the mainstream...
media. BUT...what's the odds of the TRUTH being told anyway! Anyhow, here's how it came down...

www.wsws.org/articles/2006/feb2006/shee-f02.shtml

Sheehan describes what happened once she was shown to her seat: “I was warm from climbing three flights of stairs back up from the bathroom so I unzipped my jacket. I turned to the right to take my left arm out, when the same officer saw my shirt and yelled, ‘Protester.’ He then ran over to me, hauled me out of my seat and roughly (with my hands behind my back) shoved me up the stairs. I said something like, ‘I’m going, do you have to be so rough?’

“The officer ran with me to the elevators yelling at everyone to move out of the way. When we got to the elevators, he cuffed me and took me outside to await a squad car. On the way out, someone behind me said, ‘That’s Cindy Sheehan.’ At which point the officer who arrested me said, ‘Take these steps slowly.’ I said, ‘You didn’t care about being careful when you were dragging me up the other steps.’ He said, ‘That’s because you were protesting.’ Wow, I get hauled out of the People’s House because I was, ‘Protesting.’ ”

Contrary to police statements and press reports, which claimed that Sheehan refused to cover up the shirt, she explained, “I was never told that I couldn’t wear that shirt into the Congress. I was never asked to take it off or zip my jacket back up. If I had been asked to do any of those things...I would have, and written about the suppression of my freedom of speech later. I was immediately, and roughly (I have the bruises and muscle spasms to prove it) hauled off and arrested for ‘unlawful conduct.’ ”

Sheehan’s arrest was a flagrant attack on democratic rights, in a city where free speech and the right to protest are under siege. Sheehan violated no laws. According to Capitol Police regulations, “demonstration activity” means “parading, picketing, leafleting, holding vigils, sit-ins, or other expressive conduct or speechmaking that conveys a message supporting or opposing a point of view” or anything that might attract a crowd. It does not include the wearing of “Tee shirts, buttons, or other similar articles of apparel that convey a message.”

Capitol Police have protocols for avoiding ‘incidents’ during the State of the Union, but Sheehan had done nothing to disrupt the event. The very fact that she revealed the shirt before the speech began, providing the police the opportunity to haul her out, is evidence enough.

Beverly Young, the wife of right-wing Florida Republican congressman C.W. Bill Young was treated quite differently. Mrs. Young showed up to the event wearing a T-shirt that read, “Support the Troops—Defending Our Freedom.” When asked to leave the gallery, she argued loudly and called one of the police “an idiot.” She was not roughed up, however, nor was she dragged off to jail for four hours or charged with a crime.

Moreover, Mrs. Young’s departure came after Sheehan’s arrest. Clearly, the Capitol Police felt that their actions would have been exposed as a blatant attack on opponents of Bush unless they asked the congressman’s wife to leave as well. Rep. Young spoke on the House floor Wednesday, complaining that his wife had been asked to leave the gallery.

On Wednesday, following publicity over the incidents involving Cindy Sheehan and Beverly Young—and the obvious double standard in the handling of the two women by the Capitol Police—the charges were dropped against Sheehan. Sheehan plans to file a First Amendment suit over her arrest.

more...

I do hope this girl is watching her back. She has caused these numbnutted fools enough grief that I fear someone may try to harm her. I put NOTHING past them...ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sheehan plans to file a First Amendment suit over her arrest
Go Cindy!

Keep in mind that it was public knowledge that Cindy would be at the SOTU. The police and the cameras were watching her like a hawk. I am sure Lord Pissypants wanted her out of there and could care less about breaking any laws in the process.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adriennui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. we're getting sidetracked again
cindi isn't the issue, we've got to concentrate on the important things....like what the hell is this administration doing to destroy our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carolinalady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. It is being exposed-I have heard it on every major TV news
outlet. MSNBC has portrayed the most accurate info so far and on the Situation Room, they read excerpts from her blog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King_Crimson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I want to see it in the PRINT media...
New York Times...Washington Post...Chicago Tribune, etc. I want to see it pounded on like they do the LIES and bullcrap that rolls out of the lying bastards mouths. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carolinalady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I read it this am in Wilimington Star News which is owned by the
New York times-pg A2 which is the second most important page in the World News section.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. Good post, King K & R--

Just heard on AAR that Rep. Young has dared to state overtly that he

would've seen no problem if only Cindy had been kicked out. His only

reason for making a stink was because it was his wife who was humiliated.

He added that he was categorically against eveything Cindy stood for.

These bastards hypocrisy knows no bounds. SG :mad:

P.S. Rachel Maddow's just said that Tucker Carlson said Cindy was no better that a KKKlansman (David Duke) last night on teevee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madame defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. Front page on Wash Post today...
& leading story on online edition... That's pretty prominent.

And the WaPo article is pretty obvious in pointing out how badly Bev Young is reacting to being "politely asked" to leave vs. how Cindy Sheehan was roughly handled. Young & her husband get into the typical Republican reaction of name calling; Sheehan has rational explanations of the way she was handled. Go figure.

The Capitol's Tempest in a T-Shirt
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/01/AR2006020100348.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
8. Rep Bill Young (R) FL>......says: Police LIED about incident
big story here in Fl.....front page news.......




He accused the Capitol police of overreacting and lying about what happened.

"Because she had on a shirt that someone didn't like that said support our troops, she was kicked out of this gallery," Young said. "Shame, shame."

After the speech, reporters asked Young how he felt about Sheehan being arrested.

He said the same rules should apply to Sheehan that apply to his wife. "If she was just sitting there wearing a shirt, I don't think she should be kicked out."

Beverly Young said she did not consider a support-the-troops shirt to be a political statement and that it was different from Sheehan's messages.

snip

Young said he was angry about the incident because the police Tuesday night had insisted she had chosen to leave the chamber. The police also said she was wearing a jacket and opened it to expose her shirt.


They lied about what she did," Young said.



Surprize!!

and how did Young handle it?............ROVE..........he went to Rove ..........so thats why Cindys charges were dropped..............


http://www.sptimes.com/2006/02/02/Worldandnation/Tempest_in_a_T_shirt_.shtml


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
9. MSNBC said they apologized to Cindy.

It was in the ticker at the bottom of the screen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusEarl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
10. I still haven't seen any photo's or video of Mrs. Young,
being removed from the SOTU speech. Perhaps this is just more BS from Bu$h camp, if anyone has a link that shows Mrs.Young wearing the T-Shirt in question please provide a link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC