Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dumbass Defense Dept spokesman realizes he has egg on his face & apologizes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 08:58 PM
Original message
Dumbass Defense Dept spokesman realizes he has egg on his face & apologizes
This is the totalitarian thinking Defense Dept official who castigated law firms for doing pro bono work representing detainees at Guantanamo Bay (everyone knows they're all guilty otherwise they wouldn't be there in the first place).


Law School Deans Criticize Pentagon Statement on Detainees

By JOSH GERSTEIN

More than 130 deans of American law schools have signed a letter deploring a Pentagon official's statement criticizing major law firms for representing detainees at Guantanamo Bay.

The law deans wrote that they were "appalled" by an interview last week in which the Pentagon's point man on detainee affairs, Charles Stimson, said corporations should be disturbed by the law firms' pro bono work for detainees and might want to reconsider sending business to the firms involved.

"We find Secretary Stimson's statement to be contrary to basic tenets of American law," the deans wrote. "Our American legal tradition has honored lawyers who, despite their personal beliefs, have zealously represented mass murderers, suspected terrorists, and Nazi marchers…. In a free and democratic society, government officials should not encourage intimidation of or retaliation against lawyers who are fulfilling their pro bono obligations."

http://www.nysun.com/article/46846


Now the dumb schmuck, realizing he looks to all the world like the fascist stooge he is, issues a grovelling apology in the letters to the editor section at the Washington Post and tries to claim that he never took the position that he clearly did take, (i.e. claiming it was shameful for law firms to offer to represent the terrorists in Gitmo). It was all just a big misunderstanding.
.



An Apology to Detainees' Attorneys

During a radio interview last week, I brought up the topic of pro bono work and habeas corpus representation of detainees in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Regrettably, my comments left the impression that I question the integrity of those engaged in the zealous defense of detainees in Guantanamo. I do not.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/16/AR2007011601383.html

Farkin liar.

(Thanks to http://CrooksAndLiars.com for the tip)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. rip his law license
He was supporting the breaking of laws .... as an officer of the court he should be disbarred ASAP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Did he also lie about a BJ? I missed that part.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes...
He claimed that he's had one! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lusted4 Donating Member (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Farkin Bastage is trying to bullstien us I hope they get his bells in a sling. what an icehole. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC