Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing to begin within 32 minutes. AG Gonzales will be testifying...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 08:58 AM
Original message
Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing to begin within 32 minutes. AG Gonzales will be testifying...
and you can be sure the end of NSA warrantless spying is going to be on the menu.

Here is a link to the Committee hearing page, the webcast link will work when they have started the meeting. C-SPAN does not appear to be covering this, which is quite frankly astonishing, because it's a very important hearing on a top news story.

http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearing.cfm?id=2473
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Since he is such a clear enemy of the constitution
except only for the dullest of minds out there, I wonder if he was impeached, it would signal to the rest of the administration they had better fly right or receive the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, it's clear to me now why Gonzo allowed the FISC to get a case to rule on...
Edited on Thu Jan-18-07 09:20 AM by originalpckelly
he wanted it to be secret. In the committee he's going into today, it's not the appropriate setting for national security discussions, but on the other hand, the Judiciary Committee oversees the DOJ and by extension AG Gonzales

So Gonzales can use the "national security reasons" excuse like he's done before.

They didn't want a decision in an open court, so they nullified the issue in the appeal of Anna Diggs Taylor's decision. We'll never know what the FISC judge said in his/her ruling, because it's a sealed case. We do know that Gonzales wants it to be this way because he could file an appeal, and the FISCOA (Foreign Intelligence Court of Appeals) would be activated.

They've chosen not to do that.

However, this case was so cut and dry I highly doubt the FISC judge would disagree with District Court Judge Taylor's decision. Secondly, because I know the FISC doesn't have the statutory authority to approve a blanket warrant, Gonzales is spinning on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thank you for the info...
...I was just on CSPAN looking for a link to this and thought, hey, someone on the DU will have it posted. And, sure enough, like always, the DU comes through!

This should be interesting. I have been waiting to see this little azzhat asked some tough questions. He is such a arrogant little prick, IMO. It is like he is trying to make like he is someone who he is not.

And unfortunately I get where he is coming from about some things...and I think he is a total prick for not being up-front about things like the fact that his grandparents were illegals. I come from a foreign background ~~ tho grandparents were here legally ~~ and in a certain area of the mid-west, there was a HUGE settlement of people from this European country. Some in that snooty mid-West town where I was raised and who were of the same background as me and my family, made like their parents or grandparents had been on the Mayflower and were not immigrants from Europe. Suddenly, they no longer went to the little Orthodox church where their grandparents and parents had gone, but became Episcopalians.

So besides abhorring the bastard for his views on torture and protecting the WH from war crimes prosecution, I have some dislike for him on a solely personal basis. I was never ashamed of my grandparents ~~ all four of them ~~ who spoke with strong accents and in fact I was proud as hell of them. And...to watch this little slime bucket act like this toward his grandparents and not honor them for getting to the US somehow so that he could be a US citizen, I just want to say, "Fuck you, Alberto."

JMHO

PS: K&R

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's just begun, thanks for the link!! K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. You're welcome.
Edited on Thu Jan-18-07 09:34 AM by originalpckelly
:hi"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. Let's K&R this to the greatest page, OK? TY n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. Is that Specter?
If it is, he looks awful ~~ I realized he was horribly sick and seems to have recovered, but looks like his illness really took a toll on him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. dems make sure to put AG under oath nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
28. He's under OATH? Bwahahahahaha! Now he can pay for all the lies he tells.
WTG, Dems!:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. plz feed the cube rats a morsel or two
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Gonzo now testifying.
Nothing important yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Right now he's asking that Bush's federal nominees
get an up or down vote. Lets be fair to Bush as we were to Clinton.
Also talked about internet child porn and people actually being
able to buy prescription drugs over the internet. Horrors.

Leahy on now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Senator Leahy now asking about singing statements...
in particular the mail opening signing statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Talking about Gonzo's previous testimony about opening mail!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Very upset about this!
:grr:

^^Senator Leahy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
15. I have no idea why it isn't on C-Span
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Completely F'ed-up!
The Judiciary feed isn't that great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #15
29. Because C-SPAN is obligated to show floor proceedings when in session.
This isn't rocket science. It's been the rule ever since C-SPAN was established. Now, I have no idea what's showing on C-SPAN3, but C-SPAN1 is obligated to show the House floor when in session and C-SPAN2 is obligated to show the Senate floor when it's in session.

The practice, historically, was for C-SPAN to show such key committee hearings on tape after the floor session is adjourned. Maybe, if we have patience, that's what'll happen?

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. I did not know that
C-Span 3 is the "War on terror" or something. Looks like it was shot in a local library town hall meeting or something.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #32
40. Yep. They must, by charter, provide "gavel-to-gavel" coverage.
In the past, this has even affected committee hearing scheduling in order to get coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
16. I have no idea why it isn't on C-Span
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
17. Gonzo is lying, FISA only allows the AG to search without a warrant...
only if there is no danger American mail will be opened.

Here is the statute:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode50/usc_sec_50_00001822----000-.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
19. Did I just hear Gonzales say that DOD and CIA spying on us is
OK because what is found is for intelligence only not court cases? And that he doesn't know whether the DOD and CIA is doing this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Double talk...
double plus ungood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Yes and Specter just said "the military can't investigate Amer. citizens"
Gonzo is going with "I don't know I haven't looked into it"

Leahy busted him "SHOULDN'T you know?" "Isn't that your job to know?" that sort of thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. principle protector of civil rights is washing his hands of secret searches done by other Agencies
COMPETENCE????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. It tells me that a decision has been made and we are under military rule.
This is a GO F YOUSELF administration that goes through the dance of ONLY pretending that we have a COnstitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
23. Now Specter and Leahy are both talking about Anthrax investigation...
Very interesting. The FBI has resisted talking about it to the Senate. WEIRD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. THAT is very weird. No Osama and no anthrax answers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
25. Senator Kennedy now up...
talking about Iraq and Congressional authority over it.

Gonzo has yet to respond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
26. How's the hearing been going? I just tuned in and THANKS for the link!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
30. Kennedy asking is Pres is going to come to Congress if there is a move
to go to war with Iran. Gonzales won't answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. That means NO.
I'm onto their sick, demented games.:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. Self deleted - dupe.
Edited on Thu Jan-18-07 10:39 AM by higher class
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. Now Hatch pitching for Pres - more or less saying Pres doesn't have to
go to COngress to invade Iran. The way I hear it. In other words a slam at Kennedy. Praises Gonzales.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. so many twits in Utah must be proud of their little cheerleader--who continues to cheer even
after falling and becoming a public disgrace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. Unbelievable - we're facing a military takeover of our country
and Hatch is talking child porn - for which Gonzales has plenty of answers that satisfy Hatch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
35. Now Hatch talking about child porn. Praising everyone for what.
is being done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. I don't know why Hatch just doesn't get under the table and fellate Gonzo.
Unctious Orrin is a totally nauseating pimp for the reich-wing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
39. Feinstein asked about Judges who were asked to resign - G says
they found more competenet people - in other words the sitting Judges are incomeptents. Won't talk about hardly anything on the subject except to say that he is in contact with an Arkansa Senator about the Judge he asked to resign in that area.

Leahy asked for the number of Judges who have been asked to resign - G doesn't want to talk names and stuff in public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC