Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Guess who was in favor of warrantless wiretaps during the Ford years?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
BushOut06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 08:11 PM
Original message
Guess who was in favor of warrantless wiretaps during the Ford years?
Edited on Fri Feb-03-06 08:12 PM by BushOut06
Why, none other than Pappy Bush, Dick Cheney, and Dumsfeld.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060204/ap_on_go_pr_wh/ford_era_spying

"We strongly believe it is unwise for the president to concede any lack of constitutional power to authorize electronic surveillance for foreign intelligence purposes," wrote Robert Ingersoll, then-deputy secretary of state, in a 1976 memorandum to President Ford about the proposed bill on electronic surveillance.

George H.W. Bush, then director of the CIA, wanted to ensure "no unnecessary diminution of collection of important foreign intelligence" under the proposal to require judges to approve terror wiretaps, according to a March 1976 memorandum he wrote to the Justice Department. Bush also complained that some major communications companies were unwilling to install government wiretaps without a judge's approval. Such a refusal "seriously affects the capabilities of the intelligence community," Bush wrote.

In another document, Jack Marsh, a White House adviser, outlined options for Ford over the wiretap legislation. Marsh alerted Ford to objections by Bush as CIA director and by Rumsfeld, Henry Kissinger and Brent Scowcroft over the scope of a provision to require judicial oversight of wiretaps. At the time, Rumsfeld was defense secretary, Kissinger was secretary of state and Scowcroft was the White House national security adviser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Father knows best.
:grr: :grr: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BushOut06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. How much shit do you think Pappy got away with while he was in office?
His sons are idiots. But Pappy, I have to give him credit, he's pretty smart. Evil, but smart. I wonder how much stuff he did during his administration that we will never know about. Shit, just look at all he was able to accomplish in the 60s, 70s, and 80s. Look how closely he's aligned himself with Bill Clinton (I refuse to believe that this newfound friendship is strictly that - I'm sure Pappy has something up his sleeve).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. something up his sleeve?
Edited on Fri Feb-03-06 08:28 PM by DBoon
more like many incriminating NSA intercepts that Clinton does not want to see the light of day
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BushOut06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It's no secret that Hillary is the current frontrunner for '08
Nah, I'm sure that Pappy wouldn't be doing any spying, would he? Not the former director of the friggin CIA? Not the man who engineered the whole Iran Contra scandal? Not the man who may have played a role in JFK's assassintion (cough cough)? No, such a man would NEVER stoop to something like that.

I can just imagine it now - Bush has his ear pressed aginst the wall while Clinton is on the phone in the next room - then walks in and catches Bush, who comes up with some zany excuse (er, I was checking for Iraqi bugging devices).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Hence...the Big Dog/Poppy lovefest.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, you can at least give give 'em a D for Doggedness.
Bastards.

They never stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Not till we incarcerate them.
Because we Progressives...

Never Give Up.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. There must be a genetic code for this in their DNA. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. Kick and recommend!
Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC