Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you know what's in the Patriot Act? What's set to go, what stays in?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 02:36 PM
Original message
Do you know what's in the Patriot Act? What's set to go, what stays in?
The Sun Also Sets:
Understanding the Patriot Act “Sunsets”

http://action.aclu.org/reformthepatriotact/sunsets.html

The Patriot Act contains more than 150 separate sections in 10 major titles. About a tenth of the law expires or "sunsets" this year unless Congress votes to reauthorize it. The sections discussed and listed below are the most significant provisions that Congress must examine as it deliberates again on the Patriot Act.

Even though all of the sections listed below raise civil liberties concerns, the Patriot Act contained a handful of truly radical expansions of criminal and intelligence search and surveillance authority, only some of which sunset. These changes represent the most dangerous sections of the law.


Priority sections include:

* Section 213, which expands the government's ability to execute criminal search warrants (which need not involve terrorism) and seize property without telling the target for weeks or months.
* Section 215, which allows the FBI to seize a vast array of sensitive personal information and belongings – including medical, library and business records – using secret intelligence tools that do not require individual criminal activity. Although the records can only be seized pursuant to a court order, judges are compelled to issue these orders, making such judicial review nothing more than a rubber stamp.
* Section 505, which lowers the evidentiary standard for "national security letters," or NSLs, which are issued at the sole discretion of the Justice Department, impose a blanket gag order on recipients and are not subject to judicial review. NSLs can be used to seize a wide variety of business and financial records, and in certain instances could be used to access the membership lists of organizations that provide even very limited Internet services (message boards on the ACLU's website for instance).



Troubling Sections That Sunset


Sec. 201 Expands wiretap-eligible federal criminal offenses.

Sec. 202 New wiretap authority relating to computer crime.

Sec. 203(b) Allows disclosure of information gathered in criminal investigation, including wiretaps, to intelligence, immigration and "national security" officials.

Sec. 203(d) Same as subsection 203(b) above.

Sec. 206 Creates roving wiretap authority (that is, the court order follows the target, not the phone) under FISA; did not include a requirement (which is included in other roving wiretap laws) that the eavesdropper make sure the target is actually using the device being monitored.

Sec. 207 Permits FISA wiretaps to continue for as long as a year; expands duration of physical search orders.

Sec. 212 Government can demand records and content from communications providers without consent, notice or judicial review in an emergency.

Sec. 214 Permits the government to get the telephone numbers dialed to and from a particular phone as well as Internet "routing" information that may contain some substantive content of the communications, with minimal judicial review under FISA.

Sec. 215 Allows the FBI to use FISA court orders to seize any "tangible thing," including highly sensitive medical, library, business and travel records, from a wide variety of institutions under an extremely weak standard of judicial review.

Sec. 217 Interception of "computer trespasser" communications without a judge's assent.

Sec. 218 Allows criminal investigators to use espionage powers, which require little evidence of criminal wrongdoing, even if gathering foreign intelligence is only a "significant purpose" of the investigation, instead of the more demanding "primary purpose" that was the law before this provision passed.

Sec. 220 Establishes nationwide service of search warrants for electronic evidence, opening the door to judge-shopping. Permanent But Problematic Patriot Act Sections



Permanent Provisions that Still Pose Problems for Civil Liberties


Sec. 213 Authorizes and expands “sneak and peek” delayed-notice search warrants.

Sec. 216 Permits the seizure of Internet "routing" information (e.g., website links, addressing information) in criminal cases under a low standard of proof, without protections against the unwarranted seizure of possible content.

Sec. 219 Establishes nationwide service of search warrants for physical evidence.

Sec. 411 Expanded grounds for deportation and exclusion from the country for alleged support of terrorist groups or causes.

Sec. 412 Permits the attorney general to unilaterally detain non-citizen terrorist suspects for seven days without charges; requires judicial review at six month intervals for indefinite detention.

Sec. 505 Authorizes the government to seize financial, Internet, credit and telephone records without prior judicial review and without articulable suspicion that the target is a terrorist or spy.

Sec. 507 Expands access to student records without individual suspicion.

Sec. 508 Same as Sec. 507.

Sec. 802 Defines "domestic terrorism" to include any act that is "dangerous to human life," involves a violation of any state or federal law and is intended to influence government policy or coerce a civilian population. The ACLU fears protesters will be targeted under this section.

Sec. 901 Permits the head of the the intelligence community to set "requirements and priorities" for domestic spying, which could put the CIA back in the business of monitoring Americans' lawful activities.

Title III – International Money Laundering Abatement and Anti-Terrorist Financing

Under section 303, all of Title III, which obligates banks and other financial institutions to furnish a great deal of customer information to the government, is now permanent. Congress could have passed a joint resolution before the beginning of fiscal year 2005 (which started in October 2004) to sunset the title, but did not do so, and instead repealed that special review provision instead. Title III also imposes strict and expensive new identity verification requirements on financial institutions.

http://action.aclu.org/reformthepatriotact/sunsets.html


See http://www.aclu.org/patriot for the full text of Title III.

Permitted Distribution: http://www.aclu.org/info/18863res20050401.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. All this seems to have less to do with fighting terrorism...
...and more to do with controlling American dissent. Kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Huh?
Edited on Mon Feb-06-06 01:04 AM by Mr_Spock
lied, cheated & fought for?

Hehe - I did a search and then clicked on profile.

DISRUPTOR!!











Buh-Bye :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liam_laddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. KICK!
:kick:
This topic needs the widest propagation! Spread it
far, wide and deep...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R...the Patriot Act still needs a lot of scruitiny. There are many
disturbing provisions that remain in the law, and constitute threats to our freedoms, in the name of "protecting" us from terrorism. Our country is based on the idea of liberty and civil rights. To undermine those rights in an effort "protect" us is a threat to who we are as Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. I keep hoping that a creative prosecutor will indict the administation
With charges based in this act.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. subverting democracy
they hate our freedoms
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. The thing is, even if the intent is good, the Patriot Act is dangerous.
Edited on Sun Feb-05-06 11:27 PM by Wordie
Because it's provisions can so easily be used not against terrorists, but against dissenters. Those writing the laws need to consider the worst-case scenario in how they might be applied. As I understand it, many provisions don't have adequate checks and balances included.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dunvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. The problem lies in that PATRIOT 2 can be used against this Administration
So, how can they ever let go the reins of power if their own most powerful laws could be used for their rendition and even torture?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC