Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pittsburgh Must Undo the Coup! (Stop Diebold purchase in Pittsburgh)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Lori Price CLG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 10:17 PM
Original message
Pittsburgh Must Undo the Coup! (Stop Diebold purchase in Pittsburgh)
Pittsburgh - which is CLG and Steelers country - will *STOP* Diebold in its tracks. Voting machine firm's past questioned 05 Feb 2006 (PA) Diebold Inc. soon may sell 5,600 touch-screen voting machines to Allegheny County. In 2003, then-chief executive officer Wally O'Dell -- a top fund-raiser for President (sic) Bush's re-s-election campaign -- sent out a letter to Ohio Republicans promising that he was "committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the President next year." Diebold has told Allegheny County that it could deliver 5,600 machines by the May 16 primary election, at a cost of $11.9 million. But the county's elections board, which meets Tuesday, needs to decide soon.

Pittsburgh Must Undo the Coup! 05 Feb 2006 CLG Webpage that contains the following information and full contact info for the Allegheny County Council members, and an 'email this page to a friend' option

Quick Actions!! Call, write, email and fax the Allegheny County of Elections and tell them to STOP Diebold and all GOP-owned and operated touch-screen 'voting' machines!! Office of the County Council Email: council@county.allegheny.pa.us

Mark Wolosik, Division Manager
County Office Building
542 Forbes Avenue
Room 604
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
Phone: (412) 350-4500 Fax: (412) 350-5697

Dan Onorato, Office of the Allegheny County Chief Executive
Courthouse

436 Grant Street
Room 101
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
Phone: (412) 350-6500 Fax: (412) 350-6512
Email: executive@county.allegheny.pa.us

Office of the County Council
Courthouse
436 Grant Street
Room 119
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
Phone: (412) 350-6490 Fax: (412) 350-6499

Lori Price
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lori Price CLG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. BTW, the 'Terrible Towel' is flying atop the CLG Index right now! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rene Donating Member (758 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. I read about this wonderful voting alternative on buzzflash...Can
it be true?
Vote-PAD: The Simple Voting Device that May Save American Democracy!

A BUZZFLASH GUEST CONTRIBUTION
By Brad Friedman

Yolo County, CA Spurns ES&S, Signs up to Use Vote-PAD for Voters with
Disabilities, Other Jurisidications may be Right Behind!

Made of paper, plastic and NO SOFTWARE AT ALL, the device works with a paper
ballot and costs about one-tenth of flawed, hackable electronic voting
machines...Could this be the HAVA voting solution America has been waiting
for?

State and County Elections officials from coast to coast to coast are now in
a mad, confused, frustrated scramble trying to figure out how the hell to
comply with and make sense of the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) legislation.

HAVA has proven to be an unmitigated disaster, gamed as it was from the
start by Congressmen like Ohio's Bob Ney working in cahoots with voting
machine companies. The effort has shamefully employed disabilities groups
like the National Federation for the Blind (NFB) and American Association of
People with Disabilities (AAPD), who received more than a million dollars
from companies such as Diebold, Inc., to help trump up the sympathy factor
in order to force jurisdictions to purchase unreliable electronic voting
machines (read: junk), said to be needed by disabled voters who would be
unable to vote in secret without assistance from others.

As of the 1/1/06 HAVA deadline, Boards of Elections are now officially
plunged into complete and utter disarray as they attempt to comply with the
reckless and cynical legislation's mandated requirement (dreamt up by the
American Voting Machines Vendors who stand to make billions) for at least
one disabled-accessible voting device in every precinct around the
country -- even in small precincts without a single disabled voter!

Touch-screen (DRE) voting machines created by mega-corporations like
Diebold, Inc. and ES&S have been proven, beyond a shadow of a doubt, to be
unsecure, hackable, unreliable and finally, not fully accessible by many
segments of the disabled community. Meanwhile, the one electronic-based
device in which voters with disabilities have expressed the most interest,
the AutoMARK system, has reportedly been kept largely out of the marketplace
through a number of means. ES&S, the voting machine company who managed to
secure exclusive rights to distribute the AutoMARK system, has reportedly
been overpricing it in favor of their own DRE systems. As well, there have
been a number of reports of ES&S sales reps being actively dissuaded from
properly demonstrating that system in pitches to potential customers around
the country.

As well, states such as Florida and many others have been incredibly slow at
certifying the system -- which prints a readable, verifiable, recountable
paper ballot with every vote cast -- even while they've already giving their
blessings to DRE systems made by both Diebold and ES&S, despite the
demonstrated inaccuracy, hackability and secret-software that employs
"interpreted" source code, explicitly banned by HAVA guidelines.

With the rapid approach of the 2006 primary elections, the question is now:
What the hell are these Boards of Election around the country going to do,
to both meet HAVA requirements for voters with disabilities and provide all
voters with some semblance of an accurate, reliable, recountable, democratic
means of casting their vote in secret and with some certainty that it may be
counted, and counted correctly?

Comes now, with not a moment to spare, an ingeniously simple, non-electronic
device to allow voters with disabilities of all sorts to be able to cast
their own vote, in secret, and with the knowledge that their paper ballot
will accurately reflect their intent.

Say hello to the Vote-PAD, the little paper and plastic voting assistive
device, that just may save American democracy...

At approximately one-tenth of the cost of competing (and crappy) electronic
devices, the Vote-PAD (which stands for "Voting-on-Paper Assistive Device")
was designed by Ellen Theisen, the former Executive Director of the
non-partisan election watchdog group, VotersUnite.org. She created it along
with the cooperation of people with dexterity and visual impairments.

It may well be the solution that exasperated Elections officials across the
country have been praying for.

Vote-PAD is little more than a plastic sleeve which is fitted to an existing
paper ballot, allowing voters with disabilities a number of ways to mark and
verify their ballots without additional assistance. It is used along with an
audio prompt and an electronic "verification wand" to further assist blind
voters.

The paper ballots that the voter marks with the assistance of Vote-PAD can
then be either optically-scanned or hand-counted. The device, Theisen says,
requires no Federal HAVA certification since it doesn't contain any software
(secret or otherwise) or electronic parts that would require such approval
from Federal authorities, according to HAVA guidelines.

And apparently both disabled voters and Election Officials from around the
country who have been given demonstrations of the device seem to love it!

Last week it was announced that Yolo County, California has agreed to
purchase Vote-PAD to assist persons with disabilities in marking a paper
ballot. Yolo is the very first such jurisdication in the country to come
aboard, but, in interviews with The BRAD BLOG, Theisen suggests that more
counties and even whole states may be on the verge of signing on to
Vote-PAD, as well.

Freddie Oakley, the Clerk-Recorder of Yolo County, is quoted in Vote-PAD's
press release about the first contract, as singing the praises of the new
system:

"After an enormous amount of research, we in Yolo County feel lucky to have
found this assistive device. My skepticism about computer-controlled voting
is well-known, and so is my concern for poll workers. The Vote-PAD is so
well thought out, it keeps control of the elections with the people's
servants rather than surrendering it to big corporations. And at the same
time it provides the most useful features for persons with a wide variety of
disabilities of any assistive device we've seen."While the cost of the
system varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction based on a number of
elements, Theisen pointed out to us that Oakley had informed her that the
cost for their county to use Vote-PAD for five years would roughly be "the
same amount of money Yolo County had been planning to allocate for storage
of electronic machines alone."

There are "no maintenance fees, no licensing fees," Theisen explained, "All
you have to do after you buy the original package is replace the
consumables," like the plastic sleeves when they eventually run out.

The Vote-PAD website quotes a number of citizens with disabilities who also
sing the praises of the device. "The Vote-PAD keeps my marks inside the
circle, and the pages are easier to flip," says one tester with
quadriplegia.

"For me, this 2005 election on the difficult-to-use DRE machines was just
another real reminder that we definitely need your Vote-PAD," said another
voter who is blind.

While evidence continues to mount about the many failures of computerized
voting systems, the exhorbitant costs associated with them, and the lack of
accessibility that many disabled voters have complained about while using
DRE machines, Vote-PAD just may save democracy after all.

Theisen is struggling to arrange for the manufacturing of the device quickly
and in large enough numbers to meet the sudden demand for the product. But,
as she told us recently, she's determined to make it all happen since
witnessing first hand, in her role with VotersUnite, just how needed and
necessary a device such as Vote-PAD now is for this country.

The BRAD BLOG fervently endorses the much-needed device, and recommends
strongly that readers who give a damn about democracy make sure their local
and state election officials are aware of the Vote-PAD!

The mega-corporations such as ES&S and Diebold are spending millions to
promote their flawed devices and to ensure potential customers won't hear
about Vote-PAD. So, once again, it will be a matter of the citizenry making
sure that word about Vote-PAD gets to the folks that need to know about it!

The Vote-PAD was recently featured in an article by WIRED NEWS which
includes a few instructive graphics showing how the device basically works.

Much more information, explanation, testimonials, graphic explanations and
downloadable brochures are available via the Vote-PAD website at
www.Vote-PAD.us.

Vote-PAD can be contacted via email by clicking here.

Let's make some noise about it!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lori Price CLG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-05-06 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. If the GOP can't own/use the advice to their own advantage,
they will not allow it to be used...

Lori Price
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lori Price CLG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. The Election Board meets Tuesday, Feb. 7, 2:00 PM EST.
A financial decision regarding the Diebold purchase could be made at that meeting.

Lori Price
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC