slor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 10:47 AM
Original message |
| Are the freeptards even happy with the lack of swearing in? |
|
I do not visit that site, but does anyone know?
|
| YOY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 10:54 AM
Response to Original message |
|
It's all "our side versus their side" in their piggish little eyes and anything that supports their insipid little arguments is negligible regardless of how significant or insignificant:eyes:
|
| Taguba
(43 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. He is such an honest and morally superior person he needs no oath. BARF |
| Peanutcat
(492 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 10:57 AM
Response to Original message |
| TechBear_Seattle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 11:23 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Anything the GOP desires is A-OK in their book. If they trust Gonzales, it would be insulting and demeaning to demand that he be put under oath.
|
| izzybeans
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 11:51 AM
Response to Original message |
| 5. They are the subjects of a monarchy so they would be offended |
|
Edited on Mon Feb-06-06 11:53 AM by izzybeans
if anyone dare question the truthfulness and authority of the elite ruling class.
They bow at the feet of their multiple lords everytime their tongue wags in awe of power.
"How dare they ask an 'honorable' man to submit to an oath of truth as if he were some commoner. He is party to the king, and thus beyond the law."
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:01 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
