Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Official Senate Committee Hearing - Electronic Surveillance - Thread 7

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:31 AM
Original message
Official Senate Committee Hearing - Electronic Surveillance - Thread 7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for the 'hard work', Viva!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thank you, Viva.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. Is that Bush Smirk contagious to his underlings, OR WHAT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Humor_In_Cuneiform Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
121. Maybe it is inherent in "human" (giving them the benefit of the doubt)
physiology that results in the smirking appearance when people lie.

Of course for all we know they may be human-animal hybrids!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. Thank you from me too
:hi: Viva :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. LOL!
I'm gonna run out of "spy theme" pics on the first day of hearings!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinksrival Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #12
41. They are all terrific!
Well worth a repeat! Thank you for a great job :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
82. I vote for Pierce Brosnan
*drool....*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #82
108. Hubba hubba!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. For the 3rd time today, Alberto blames Bush.
The president is responsible for authorizing this program.

Hm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. Does that leave the door open to bring Bush to this hearing?
It is part of the record, can they bring Bush before them for questions....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
21. Alberto blames Spyboy? hehehehe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
26. but he is the highest lawyer in the land
He has to agree that he can do it or he wouldn't be doing it. Collusion - Gonzales, Miers and blivet**!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #26
39. yes, he is the highest lawyer in the land
would Bush (a non-lawyer) claim he has the legal authority if Gonzales advised him otherwise? Does this not reek of "just following orders"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #39
79. It reeks of Gonzales and Meirs telling him "anything you want boss".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. His eyes are shifty and blinking a whole bunch..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
43. he's trying to figure out which Senator
has his hand on the lever for the trapdoor. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
8. Hi everyone - seeking clairification

I am wondering -

Are there going to be any other witnesses?

What about a special counsel?

Who has testified thus far?

I am behind the times.

Any summary would be greatly appreciated.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Don't know about anyone else testifying today
No word on special counsel at all. Just Gonzales today I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. Gonz: double speak
Biden: You've acknowledged that you're not bound by FISA.
Gonz: There are minimization requirements consistent with FISA if FISA applied

which it doesn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
10. Biden: you have not shared info with Intel committee!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #10
100. VIDEO - Biden's Round 1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #100
119. Thank you.
visuals add so much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merbex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
11. Okay ,Who are you and what have you done with the real Joe Biden
short and to the point questions?

He looks like Biden sounds like Biden but without the bloviating

New and improved Joe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. LOL! I had exactly the same reaction! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
20. Looks like Biden is listening to bloggers.
I hope so, at least.

How many times can his aides read the words "Bloviatin' Biden" and not mention it to Joe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #20
111. Good point! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
13. AG argues for Fascism.
Edited on Mon Feb-06-06 11:39 AM by WinkyDink
Definitions of Fascism:
"They appealed to nationalist sentiments and prejudices, exploited anti-Semitism, and portrayed themselves as champions of law, order, Christian morality, and the sanctity of private property."

"...military aggression so inherent in fascist philosophy...." " Peaceful, complacent nations are seen as doomed to fall before more dynamic ones, making struggle and aggressive militarism a leading characteristic of the fascist state. Imperialism is the logical outcome of this dogma."

"all forms of fascism have three common features: anticonservatism, a myth of ethnic or national renewal, and a conception of a nation in crisis."

"In general, fascists stand against all scientific, economic, religious, academic, cultural, and leisure activities that do not serve their vision of national political life."

And finally:

"A fascist movement almost always asserts that the nation faces a profound crisis....Fascists claim that the nation has entered a dangerous age of mediocrity, weakness, and decline. They are convinced that through their timely action they can save the nation from itself. Fascists may assert the need to take drastic action against a nation's "inner" enemies."

(Quotes from Encarta and infoplease.)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Nice post --- Yes he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinksrival Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
14. Why does Alberto
begin his sentances with......."the program I am discussing at this time" ????

Are there other programs? More than one? Is this how they are getting away with not discussing the scope of spying. Multiple programs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:37 AM
Original message
Certainly insinuates there are OTHER programs.... eh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. makes you wonder, doesn't it?
I think a more accurate question would not be "if" but "how many"?
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #14
76. I believe they have set a date as to when they want to say they
began THIS program, the TSP. What they call what they did before that date must have a different "operation" name now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
17. Biden to Gonzo - Can you assure us that you are competent - LOL n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
22. Does anyone know what happened when the FISA judges met with the AG
Edited on Mon Feb-06-06 11:37 AM by in_cog_ni_to
a while ago? It was a month or so ago. The remaining FISA judges were meeting with the AG to see what they had been doing. Have we ever heard what came of that meeting? Have any of the judges spoken out about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
23. who can we put under oath and say no Americans have been spyed on
Unless they are a terror suspect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #23
56. and let's detemine whether
their definition of "terror suspect" is a reasonable one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
25. Biden: wants assurance
Can you assure us u are confident that no 1 is being evesdropped on in the US except suspected terrorist.

Gonz: can't give absolute assurance
safeguards in place
procedures being followed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
27. Go get 'em Biden!!!
Shake that finger. I loved the look in his eyes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
28. *sigh* Kyl up...
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #28
37. "a little humility is necessary before we accuse the President of a crime"
ROTFLMAO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
29. WOW! Bruce Fine!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merbex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
30. Biden just blew me away
Who says people can't change bad habits?

No bloviating today by Joe

There is hope for all if Biden can change this nasty habit he usually has
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
giant_robot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
31. I wish they were as determined to get al al Qaeda
at Tora Bora, or before going to war with a country that had nothing to do with al Qaeda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
32. I like the words Accuse The President Of A Crime
has a nice ring...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #32
114. It would be even better to insert the word "bogus" before "president." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
33. OK, this is the man that defined ass hat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
34. JON KYL: humility called for by members of committee.
huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #34
42. Kiss King Georgies but and let him do as he wills
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
35. Kyl saying that Leahy was wrong for saying this is illegal
Said he was calling the President a criminal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #35
53. yup,.... so n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #35
67. Yes, and...?
The law was broken. The President authorized the activity that violated that statute. Are we supposed to pretend that didn't happen because the President said it was okay? Sorry, not feeling intimidated today. The law is the law, no matter who breaks it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
36. CONGRESS SHOULD BE HUMBLE????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:40 AM
Original message
I was hoping he'd call for humility by members of the Exec Branch.
Prez could use a good dose of humility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #36
50. I got the impression that he meant we ALL should be humble
Don't say the President committed crimes, unless he is a democratic president, then we will talk about it and bloviate about it every chance we get!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
38. Born to lie!!! These GOP people, masters of all lies!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Humor_In_Cuneiform Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
40. Senator Kennedy's approach was brilliant: Can the evidence
Edited on Mon Feb-06-06 11:41 AM by Humor_In_Cuneiform
obtained be relied on not to be invalidated?

Kyl wants more humility, let it begin with him! He is such a jerk. Then he proceeds to tell his story and advise everyone in the world how they should conduct themselves.

:puke:

Specter is the only Repuke who asked good questions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #40
47. Kyl is anecdotal ... monkeys are flying out of his butt!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #40
49. 70% of the Republican party should be prosecuted under RICO
They are a gang of criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Humor_In_Cuneiform Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #49
63. Yes they are. Either by actively committing the crimes, or by
knowingly allowing them to occur without speaking up. Or in most cases swearing that everything they do is illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #40
74. I thought Kennedy did a lousy job
and before anyone jumps on me- I'm a big fan of the Senator's. He speechified. We need precise and probing questions. Leahy did it, Biden did it. We need a prosecutorial approach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #74
91. He was too clever by half. Or hahf. Heh.
Tried to get people to go, "Hmmmmm" about potential cases' either being started or getting thrown out based on illegally-obtained "evidence". But Gonzo could just smirk and think, "Don't you see who's on the SCOTUS, fool?!"

Also, his mild-mannered, sneak-up-on-ya-for-a Gotcha! style didn't work; just another snoozer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Humor_In_Cuneiform Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #74
92. I get what you mean, but I think Kennedy found a very relevant angle
that everyone ought to be concerned about.

IOW, cases may later be tossed out because the authorization is later found to be illegal, or NSA operatives may be acting illegally under the program.

That ought to be pretty easy for everyone to agree is a major potential flaw.

I think coming at it from every angle provides the best Congressional over sight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
44. Jumping to conclusions
when you spy on Americans, without a warrant, you are breaking the law asswipe...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:43 AM
Original message
FISA has not been effective, FISA is not broke
Edited on Mon Feb-06-06 11:44 AM by dogday
Out of 5,000 warrants asked for only 3 were turned down. They don't use FISA because they don't have any evidence for what they are doing... FISA is a pain in their asses...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
68. I thought it was 19,000 & 4.... same idea, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
73. actually, I heard the numbers were
5 turned down out of 16,000 this morning on NPR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
45. Kyl's going to make me puke`
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
46. you are either WITH the constitution or AGAINST it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #46
55. But it is OPINION what the document says, and whether you are in
violation of it.

Needless to say, the MAJORITY opinion wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
48. Source of the smirk:
Alito.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
51. Pleased with Biden - wonders never cease!

He was right on-

We need a official Intelligence committee hearing with people sworn in....

Pointed to Gonzalez's not being able to GURANTEE that only suspected terrorists on foreign soil are being subjected to the program.

I am SICKENED by the Republicans. CRIMINALS, in the FIRST degree.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #51
61. biden has been right on a lot, we just dismiss it as soon
as the warmth fades and start in on the old tired line

just as all these dems are getting raves today, tomorrow we will forget and call them spineless do nothings.


:shrug:

go figure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laylah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
52. What the H*LL
is WRONG with these people? Kyle from AZ stating something along the lines of people jumping to conclusions before the "Program" was explained!:argh:

Jenn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
feelthebreeze Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
54. Let's sum up our talking points again in the echo chamber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
57. Gonzo: repeats - do not amend FISA. FISA is reasonable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #57
60. then why not use it?????????????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #57
62. If they are not bound by any laws, who gives a sh*t what the law says?
Edited on Mon Feb-06-06 11:44 AM by BlueEyedSon
No revisions necessary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #57
65. Right.
FISA so "reasonable" the Bushies had to run around it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
58. "We'll follow FISA, except when we want to violate the 4th amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chalco Donating Member (817 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
59. I want Gonzales injected with truth serum and hooked up to
a lie detector.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Humor_In_Cuneiform Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #59
77. Send him to Gitmo and give him his own treatment. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
64. Hey Kyl, we appreciate that it is a very ILLEGAL program! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
66. It's a simple question. Won't anyone ask it?
Why was FISA necessary?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #66
69. wow, great nix pix
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #69
80. It's chilling, isn't it?
Google Nixon + image.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #69
89. is that the Zapruder film?
the one that was eventually 'lost' ?

dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #66
78. I know the repukes don't want an answer to that question. How about a Dem?
PLEASE!!!! ask THE question!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
70. I wonder when the repukes decided they would support the spying on U.S.
citizens? How do we stop this shit? How do we control an out-of-control government and their cohorts in OUR Congress?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
71. This is such utter BS!
The only thing missing is Tweety with one of his "Bush is noble" comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Humor_In_Cuneiform Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
72. Kyl: We need this to detect future attacks. But why bother
cause if you send reports to * he won't look at them or act on them anyhow?

PDB Aug 6 2001

Kyl is so self-important. Guess it figures, as people often see faults in others that they themselves have but are unaware of.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
75. "After Action Report" Kyl is nuts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
81. Gonz: I was not present at all briefings of members of Congress.
Edited on Mon Feb-06-06 11:49 AM by LiberalAndProud
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #81
85. I am sure you were not
and made sure you could not repeat those particular conversations before a hearing, no freaking way...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tgnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
83. Kyl actually undercut the administration: he asked if warrantless spying
of two al Qaeda within the US is included here, and Gonzo said no, we'd have to look into whether that's legal.

Which undercuts the whole "if al Qaeda calls, we want to know what they're saying" line of defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
84. I feel safer knowing
they`re spying on Quakers and grandmothers with No War posters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
86. Herb Kohl (D) Wisconsin: Why not follow the law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berner59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #86
95. "We believe we were following the law"....
that's nice...but how about you were wrong???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
87. Gonz: we are acting in manner consistent with FISA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #87
96. Consistent doesn't mean "bypassing." eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
88. I`m waiting for Feingold.
He`ll slice `em and dice `em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #88
93. I hope so. He needs to be sliced and diced.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
90. Gonz: twitch, flip, screeeech!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
94. Gonz: of course there was debate
complicated foreign intelligence act
authorization to use military force
of course there was a debate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Epiphany4z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #94
98. They don't want to amend fisa
because they want NO oversight ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
97. Thread 8 is up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
99. So what can happen here? Dems obviously think the Pres. broke
Edited on Mon Feb-06-06 11:54 AM by Feeney2
the law and Repukes run things. What can be done here. Can charges be filed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #99
103. win in 06
Its SOOOOO important!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
101. FISA works well in peacetime.
Kyl: Can assure that authority will not be abused by this or any other prez?
Gonz: Authority to protect country under constitution. Many aspects of FISA make sense to me. they work well in peacetime.

Wasn't FISA enacted in time of (undeclared) war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
102. Gonzales: Congress can make their stupid little laws, but
Deal Leader won't follow them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
104. were happy to listen to your ideas? per gonzo
who the hell does he think he is!????

reminds me of what elders in church would tell husbands to say t0 their wives....ill listen but im the final authority....condescending prick!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #104
110. cool the first protester is removed!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
105. Didn't Congress turn down Bush's request for wiretaps ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonGoddess Donating Member (364 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
106. The constitution has set limits
on Presidential powers. But, he tries oh so hard to qualify it by saying basically that CONGRESS has no authority to use those limits. URRRGGHH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
107. *AHEM* ask WHY they were spying on QUAKERS and anti-war protestors!
Why won't any Dem ask that question??? Leahy mentioned them in his speech, but why no DIRECT QUESTION? I'm so sick of this crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #107
109. I'm waiting for that too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Humor_In_Cuneiform Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
112. Anyone catch what the protester said? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #112
118. No. He was too far away. Something about "spying on Americans" that's all
I caught.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
113. somebodty called gonzo a fascist i think
lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #113
115. ENFORCE THE LAW.. ARREST BUSH
t-shirt just shown... guy still there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Humor_In_Cuneiform Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #115
117. He was promptly escorted out. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Humor_In_Cuneiform Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #113
120. Yea, I thought Gonzo said he wasn't a pacifist, but I'm sure it musta
been "fascist."

Who could argue with that from an admin with such a great record of truthtelling?

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
116. Question. Why aren't ALL Senators PISSED AS HELL about this
WH telling them they do not have to follow the laws Congress makes? In essence, that makes the Congress USELESS. Why do they want to be useless? Why aren't they setting them straight on who makes laws and who doesn't? WHY aren't they defending the Constitution? They really are fascist rat bastards, aren't they? :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #116
122. My thoughts exactly. Why was the citizen
who called Gitmo Gonzo a facist the only one in that room who was noticably pissed? What is it going to take to light a fire under the Dems?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #116
123. Because they'd be amazed how you are shocked
Besides Selection 2000 for the Dems, the entire Congress, including GOP bootlickers, has sat back while Bush made hundreds of gratuitous signing statements that virtually slapped them in the face each time with "l'etat, c'est moi". It's such old habit for them I suppose they have to get quite worked up to even appear shocked, or colorful enough to appear "concerned". In that there is no difference of party among the whole lot. The faucet has been dripping for years and they should all of a sudden get alarmed they need to fix it?

As a party each one gives the impression of unfitness to field a government of representation or responsibility. Wind up toys could just as well do the function but then the administration would have to do all the nitty detail work and laziness and focus on "other things" is their lasting hallmark. If the Congress were to credibly demand accountability the administration would collapse within the week.

The "idea" of proposing a law to limit the fox raiding the henhouse without permission is so funny it hurts. A lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
124. Thread 8 is here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC