King Coal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 02:28 PM
Original message |
I just checked and Vegas already has a line on whether Gannon |
|
Edited on Mon Feb-06-06 02:28 PM by King Coal
will make KO tonight.
|
rainy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 02:29 PM
Response to Original message |
1. What's the story with gannon today? I must have missed it. |
Stephanie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. he seems to have gotten his press pass back |
|
let the US Capital be safe for prostitutes once more!
|
King Coal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. He threw a hissy until they gave him one. |
RazzleDazzle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
MY favorite term for them, and it's especially apt for Gannon, isn't it?
|
bananas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
8. there were several threads and can-o'-fun video |
sam sarrha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. that "Sucker" has F'n pictures.. from back when he was Jonny Gosch.. not |
|
Edited on Mon Feb-06-06 07:12 PM by sam sarrha
mention some from the 190+ visits to the WH, 14 of which he left by the back door without signing out, in the morning.
he has a lot of 'Pull'.. so to speak
|
gimama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 02:29 PM
Response to Original message |
King Coal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
0007
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message |
4. What's the price? He will or won't? |
|
Edited on Mon Feb-06-06 02:31 PM by 0007
|
Maddy McCall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 02:31 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Keith loves strange Gannon news. :D
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:17 AM
Response to Original message |