Tom Rinaldo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 05:40 PM
Original message |
"That's a Classified Operational Detail Re: National Security |
|
but trust us, it's OK. We determined it is legal."
Government would be so much more efficient if we didn't waste time asking this Administration questions that they can't answer.
|
kcass1954
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 06:08 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Not "can't answer" - "Won't answer" n/t |
Tom Rinaldo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-06-06 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. According to Gonzales they "can't". You an insurgent or something? |
|
Challenging our President in a time of war? Better not talk to anyone overseas, and probably not anyone here either. Can't be certain about the latter though because that involves classified operational details regarding national security.
|
kcass1954
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-07-06 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Well, when junior said "You're either with us or you're with the |
|
terrorists", I immediately said "Well, I guess I'm with the terrorists then!"
|
Tom Rinaldo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-07-06 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Good that you know your place, lol. |
|
Actually I think the complete Gonzales line is:
"Sorry, but that's a classified operational detail regarding national security shielded by executive priviledge on a subject that may someday come before a court I might be appointed to."
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:47 AM
Response to Original message |