Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Elizabeth Dole spoon-feeds moronic BS to party faithful

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
William Seger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 06:05 PM
Original message
Elizabeth Dole spoon-feeds moronic BS to party faithful
Edited on Mon Feb-06-06 06:15 PM by William Seger
Here's Elizabeth Dole's latest propaganda missive from the National Repugnant Senatorial Committee. It isn't just that (as always) she treats her constituents as ignorant and gullible rubes who don't know any of the facts about the issues; but it's absolutely unbelievable the nerve and hypocrisy these people have to not just defend illegal and unconstitutional actions by a Republican president, but then also accuse anyone who dares complain about it of "partisanship" and "political posturing." This is what we're up against, America: These people will try to turn breaking the law into a campaign advantage by accusing anyone who doesn't shut up about it of being part of the "liberal fringe."

Dear Friend,

This week, the Senate is convening hearings on the National Security Agency's terror surveillance program. These hearings will not only tell Americans more about this critical initiative, but will highlight the difference between Republicans and Democrats on issues of security. We will also learn how closely Senate Democrats follow the marching orders of liberal fringe groups like Moveon.org who irrationally oppose the program at the expense of our safety. I look forward to these hearings, and to finding out just where my Democrat colleagues stand on this important issue.

The terror surveillance program is one of our national security professionals' most important tools in the battle to keep this nation safe. By intercepting and monitoring telephone conversations between Al Qaeda and their terrorist operatives in the United States, we are preventing attacks on our homeland and keeping Americans out of harm's way. We can't wait until terrorist plans are in motion to try and thwart them. We need to know what terrorists want to do before they set out to do it--and the terror surveillance program allows us to do just that. Simply put, this program saves lives.

Yet some head-in-the-sand Democrats don't seem to see it that way, and even if they do, are so blinded by their dislike for the President that they cannot bring themselves to support the initiative lest it be construed as support for George Bush. So they resort to outlandish charges that the President is breaking the law, that the program is unconstitutional, that it threatens our civil liberties. Taking their cue from their party's fringe--a fringe, unfortunately, that is taking increased control of the Democrat party every day--some have even raised the notion of impeaching the President. To dignify these calls would be beneath any serious person, but to ignore them would be dangerous. If Moveon.org and Howard Dean get to call the shots when it comes to our national security, this country is in big trouble. In their ideal world, we would have the ridiculous and unthinkable policy of hanging up when Al Qaeda calls.

The charge that the President is somehow breaking the law with this program is demonstrably false. Previous Presidents have authorized similar programs, and the Supreme Court has declared them constitutional. What's more, it is widely held that during wartime, the President is granted increased powers in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief. When it comes to keeping Americans safe, the President has wide latitude to do what is necessary. That doesn't mean he's above the law, but it does mean that he's above the frivolous attacks of disaffected liberals.

I understand the special place we all afford to our constitutionally protected rights, and that because of our love of these rights some Democrats think they can score political points by portraying the terrorist surveillance program as a threat. They misquote our founders and feign indignation that the Administration would act so callously towards our freedoms. But the reality is that this program protects the very freedoms Democrats allege it curtails. To listen to some partisans, you'd think the NSA had nothing better to do than listen to Aunt Jenny calling her niece to wish her a happy birthday. Liberal demagoguery on this issue not only poisons what should be a healthy debate about our national security, but also needlessly injects partisanship where it does not belong.

This week's hearings are critical to determining whether this nation will confront terror with our best or with political posturing. The terror surveillance program keeps terror off our shores, and is saving American lives every day. We cannot let the radical left dictate our national security policy. I hope that at the hearings Democrats ignore the directives of their party's fringe and do what is right to keep America safe.

With my warmest best wishes,

Senator Elizabeth Dole
NRSC Chair

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flakey_foont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Blather
I am embarassed that Ms Dole is my Senator, totally useless!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wind Dancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I know exactly what you mean.
She doesn't even respond to my calls or emails anymore.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cami715 Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Dole has no brain.
She is only capable of repeating what she is told to say - mostly the Republican talking points.

Hopefully, North Carolinians will see fit to replace her when she comes up for re-election.

It appears she uses her entire salary for comestic surgery. That is her priority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusty charly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. "taking increased control of the Democrat party every day"
yeah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Is Elizabeth Dole still alive?
I know her brain died a LLLOOOONNNNNGGGGGG time ago...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiviaOlivia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Is she an alcoholic?
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Charlie Brown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why no warrants, Liz?
"By intercepting and monitoring telephone conversations between Al Qaeda and their terrorist operatives in the United States, we are preventing attacks on our homeland and keeping Americans out of harm's way. We can't wait until terrorist plans are in motion to try and thwart them."

If the targets of this program are so cut-and-dry terror suspects, then why can't the NSA follow the Congressionally/Constitutionally prescribed route of obtaining warrants?
I've yet to get an adequate response to that question from anyone who supports this crap.

If Liz believes the Prez can conduct surveillance activities on US citizens without following the legally prescribed FISA protocol, I think it is she who needs lecturing on the Costitution, and not her constituents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. Come on
Do you think she wrote that. Heck she probably didn't even read that letter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William Seger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Of courses, you're right
"... liberal fringe groups... Democrat colleagues... terror surveillance program... critical to determining whether this nation will confront terror..." Obviously the work of a professional right-wing propagandist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. She knows how to piss people off!
Remind me now, why do we hate America?

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. Rove must have written it for her
What unadulterated garbage - yet people will buy it. It would be laughable, if it didn't so obviously prey on ignorance and fear.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. Liberty vs. Security and Ben Franklin, Liz...google it.
'Nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. Does she know better? Or, is she that stupid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cami715 Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I vote for stupid!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC