Got this off Raw Story who got it from a C/Net article and think it is significant.
The Electronic Frontier (
http://www.eff.org ) may be worth some support here as they have already sued AT&T over this issue. There is information about the national scene, but also there was some information about local companies, that they either refused to say if they had participated or not. Just thought you all might like to know who is refusing to say whether or not they cooperated (which means to me that most likely they did) and what this may mean as far as your telecommunications company is doing...
Here is some information as to what the NSA did locally:
<snip>
"...Global Crossing spokesman Tom Topalian said "99 percent of wiretapping is done at a local phone company level" instead of at backbone providers. Topalian declined to answer questions about NSA access, and added: "All U.S. carriers have to comply with the CALEA act, and Global Crossing complies with CALEA." (CALEA is a 1994 federal law requiring certain telecommunications providers to make their networks wiretap-friendly for domestic law enforcement, not intelligence agencies.)
Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., last month sent a letter (click for PDF) to companies including Google, Yahoo, EarthLink, Verizon and T-Mobile asking them if they cooperated with the NSA. News.com asked similar questions, but expanded the number of companies to include backbone and submarine cable providers..."
<snip>
http://news.com.com/Some+companies+helped+the+NSA,+but+who/2100-1028_3-6035305.htmlCat In Seattle