Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This stands out from Fahrenheit 9/11- re wiretap defense

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Number_6 Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 01:09 PM
Original message
This stands out from Fahrenheit 9/11- re wiretap defense
F9-11 is now somewhat of a historic document. It was made
before several of the new waves of scandals. But, there is
one bit of Dubya-speak in which he is apparently commenting
on why a Senate 9/11 Panel investigation is out of the question.
History shows that he caved and there eventually was a 9/11 panel
(but no comment from me on whether it investigated anything). Point
is, in resisting, Dubya said, "We don't want the enemy to know the
methods we use to gather intelligence" or words very close to that.
This argument I'm sure blocks discovery of a host of BFEE sins.
He's been uttering it since '03 or whenever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
judy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Which reminds me, I have read on DU
that the wiretapping started BEFORE 9/11.
Do we have any links for that? Something we can email to the Judiciary Committee members for examples?
Where does this information come from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number_6 Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Source
If you're asking where that Dubya statement came from, we'd probably need
to ask Satan, I mean Michael Moore. I saw Fahrenheit 9/11 for the
first time last night. That clip *may* be from the same Dubya visit
to the NSA that I think is shown often on cable news, such as
Olbermann, these days. The one where Duyba is swaggering in a
doorway with lots of metal detectors and things around him. I'm
not sure the clip in F-9/11 is from the same Dubya footage and I'm
not sure when exactly that footage was filmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yep I remember that too
I can't remember where the link(s) was from but I do remember reading that.
Are they going to have witness testimonies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Check here.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Thank you!
Don't the folks on the Committee know about this?
Let's email it to them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Welcome to DU, cretin.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who is *'s enemy? You & me or al Qaeda? Who is * defending
by hiding evidence. Who are * friends? Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. He didn't want us to know what he was up to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Exactly
He always says "the enemy" but no enemy is declared. After the hearings last night I was listening to the CSPAN callers (everyone but two people were pissed off) and one person spewed the rightwing talking points. "Oh the enemy will know what we're doing!" "The enemy" this and that for every damn excuse they do. Imagine if this was Bill Clinton saying this crap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yesterday, while listening to Randi, I believe it was a caller
Edited on Tue Feb-07-06 01:46 PM by Cleita
who said that the war resolution that Congress or maybe it was the UN gave to Bush ends when Osama bin Laden is either caught or dies. When that happens he has no more authorization to wage war. It means he has to withdraw and bring back the troops ending both wars and has no mandate, no matter how flimsy anymore, to wage new wars.

Now I was planting a tree at the same time I was listening so I was somewhat distracted, but it has stayed with me and made me wonder if it's true or if I even heard that right. What does this mean? If so, shouldn't our intrepid reporters, overseas, (I don't have any confidence in our homegrown ones anymore), be trying to find out if Osama is dead or alive?

Could it be possible that the Bush administration is keeping the myth of Osama alive for this reason? That last tape that was supposedly received from Osama was very suspiciously not really him for various reasons, even though the CIA, said it was him. Now, they wouldn't lie, would they?

I think I'm going to go do some googling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number_6 Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Osama dead or alive
I heard that on Randi too, re his war powers-- we need to take away *'s
excuse for almighty authority. Osama may well be dead and
that would do it, I think, re Congressional authority.
But, confidentially, I doubt that Osama bin Ladin had
that much to do with 9/11. I call him Flag Boy.
If Congress officially believes Osama dunnit, then fine, for
defining a rule upon which to end the "war".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. U.S. mulls $50 million bin Laden bounty
Monday, January 24, 2005

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- As part of an intensified effort to capture terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden, the State Department is considering doubling the bounty on his head to $50 million, State Department officials said Monday.

Legislation passed in November by Congress as part of the appropriations bill allowed the State Department to double the current $25 million reward for information leading to bin Laden's capture, under the Rewards for Justice Program.

The program seeks to prevent acts of terrorism against the United States. It pays rewards for information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of terrorists attempting to commit or committing acts against U.S. interests.

Bin Laden is still thought to be hiding somewhere along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border, but intelligence officials in both countries say there has been no sign of him for the past 20 months, according to Time magazine.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/01/24/binladen.reward/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. It was during Biden's first questioning yesterday-LINK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Thanks liveoaktx. I will listen to it.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC