Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Idaho group wants all wolves in the state exterminated

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
montana500 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 09:18 PM
Original message
Idaho group wants all wolves in the state exterminated
www.wilderness-sportsman.com (news section)


"COEUR D'ALENE, Idaho (AP) -- An anti-wolf group wants to put an initiative on the ballot to remove wolves from the state "by any means possible."

Wolves have been controversial in Idaho since the federal government reintroduced 15 of the animals in 1995, decades after they had been killed off in the state. Some hunters say the wolves diminish deer and elk populations, while some ranchers say wolves put their livestock at risk.

The group launching the initiative, the Idaho Anti-Wolf Coalition, is tired of seeing wolves treated better than humans, Ron Gillett, head of the coalition, told The Spokesman-Review."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. pogroms: it's what's for dinner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Anti-wolf? Oh, for Heaven's sake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, it's Idaho...
Next comes anyone who isn't a WASP... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickinSTL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. that's just sick...
how about we wipe out the republicans in the state?

That would solve the problem, right? :mad:

(oh, and for those of you not able to recognize it...:sarcasm:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. And that would leave a grand total of what, 1 person?
On the bright side, he could just elect himself US Senator and give us another safe seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickinSTL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. heh...yeah...about that
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EvolveOrConvolve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. That would be me.
And I don't want the damn job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. White people living in the state are a 'dangerous introduced species'
They are the ones that need to have their #'s checked (and their heads it seems).

Isn't Idaho the state w/ the highest b*sh support?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montana500 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. hehhe I think that's Utah nm
nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Utah beat them by a point BUT I think that Idaho is more red
Edited on Tue Feb-07-06 10:26 PM by Hippo_Tron
Believe it or not, Utah has a fully functioning democratic party. They have a dem congressman and the dem candidate for Governor was very competitive, only losing by a few points even though the race was held during a presidential election year.

Idaho, on the other hand, doesn't really even have two parties. The thought of a democrat being elected to any major office in Idaho is laughable.

It's really a shame too, because Idaho once had a great democratic senator named Frank Church. Church lead the committee that exposed the abuses committed by the FBI including the threats made on Martin Luther King's life. Given the current situation it woudld be great if we had him in the senate today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Idaho Heh? I think we should introduce more Wolves into the state..about..
..10 million of them..and very, very hungry :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. Wow.
We just got our red wolf population up in my state through a co-operative effort. I didn't imagine there was another state somewhere trying to exterminate them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. F**king morons. We have tried to get rid of aerial wolf hunting here
for years but the pukes keep bringing it back. Fuckers. I hate them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. Where are you? What state? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. Proof why Montana and Washington made those folks get their own state
Sheesh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BushOut06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. LOL - you know you're out there when Montana doesn't want you
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
400Years Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
14. wolves improve deer and elk populations by culling out the sick and infirm
"Some hunters" my ass, who? the media always does the "some people say" schtik.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susanna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
33. My first thought was...
"Sounds like some seriously crappy hunters." Seems like if these hunters are not able to kill an elk/deer, they blame it on the wolves who can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwolf68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
15. No words can be used to describe

Just how obscene these people are.

The ecological non-sense of this groups comments notwithstanding I was interested in this quote: "Wolves treated better than humans?" by Mr. Gillett ... I want this idiot to show me any proposal in existence tht promotes the extermination of the entire population of any one state's humans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
16. Fuck those cowboys and the prairie roaches they rode in on.
And just how much of their grazing land is BLM? That's my land too, buckaroos and the ESA is still the law of the land, at least until Pombo and CJ Roberts wreck it.

Better this:

http://www.gprc.org/Buffalo_Commons.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EvolveOrConvolve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. The ESA isn't applicable
because the wolves aren't listed as endangered except for near the Canadian border.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. The wolves that were introduced to Yellowstone some
years back have been making their way into Colorado. Colorado's so crowded now that I fully expect an outcry similar to this one soon.

If I remember correctly, one indication of their migration into Colorado was that one was found dead on a freeway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tn-guy Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
21. Why should the western states get all the wolves?
I say, reintroduce the wolf to Central Park!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. There are enough of those there already.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EvolveOrConvolve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
22. I can tell you that most Idahoans don't agree with this group
Most of Idahoans probably don't agree with many of us here at DU either, but there is a center point where I think most Idahoans are at.

The problem occurs when small ranchers who graze on their own land lose cattle to wolves, and have little recourse, either against the wolf or financially. The large corporate ranchers who suck off the federal teat (all the while complaining about "welfare queens") are the ones pushing for wolf extermination, simply because they don't give a shit about the land or wildlife. They care only about money. The small, family owned ranches don't use the gov't land, and complain less, because they live here, and understand the bigger picture. I agree that these small-timers need a way to deal with the issue. That's part of the reason the feds turned over management of the wolf program to our state Fish & Game Department.

I can almost guarantee that the extermination idea won't happen. I think there is a good chance that many wolves will be relocated, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Excellent points. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smurfygirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
26. Ignorance breeds fear of wolves
If Idahoians really knew how beneficial wolves can be they would take a stand against such actions.
It is the same ignorance and fear that keep them voting for the Republican party.
It would be wise for the democratic party to stand up in Idaho and educate people on the wolf issue. If people start hearing the truth they often open their mind to learning more of the truth instead of getting wrapped up in fear.
I am sorry for the wolves and the people of Idaho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Yes, but be sure to see post #22. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
28. Idaho, home of Mark Fuhrman
Lower than whale shit in the Marianas Trench. My favorite creature about to be swiftboated. How fucking infuriatingly sad. A curse on those who would hurt this magnificent animal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. That's what a lot of people think of when they think about Idaho,
but there are also a lot of decent people there--not too far from where Fuhrman took his refuge.

The Idaho panhandle is a beautiful place indeed, not only for people like him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. yes, I know,
I worked with a Couer D'laine woman for a while. She was cool.
Idaho must be shamed before the rest of the West for even considering such treacherous pillaging of the nation's natural treasure. Preparations should begin for a tourist Boycott if it even begins to move foward. God forbid these motherf*ckers hire o goddamn shepheard with good dogs and the cattleman can hire cowboys to patrol their herds. No, they would rather sterilize the land and go monoculture meat, and expect no losses with no more investment than barbed wire fencing. whew ! it just poured out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. That's OK.
It is a beautiful area, and we can only hope that the locals can continue to maintain control.

I have vistied Sandpoint and Hope and have affections there. Such gorgeous places!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
31. We in Idaho are used to this type of group
Anti-wolf/grizzly bear sentiment is nothing new here. Hell, anti-salmon feelings can even run high when our blessed Snake River dams are threatened. "Environmentalist" and "Leninist" are equally interchangeable terms here for many. Despite the fact that Idaho's greatest asset is its vast collection of natural landscapes, for many in the resource-extraction businesses, timber, mining, and ranching trump Mother Nature. Wolves are viewed in precisely the same light as household mice: a destructive pest to be dealt with as quickly as possible. Nevermind that they provide as integral a function to a healthy forest as does an occasional fire: what they do not kill, they make stronger.

It doesn't generally help that almost all of our state legislators come from the above farm/ranch/timber/mining areas. Molly Ivins would have a field day (or decade) here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC